On April 9, 2018 Antiwar.Com reported that “Syrian Red Crescent Says No Evidence of Chemical Attack in Syria,” with respect to the alleged Saturday attack in Douma. The article quoted a (since corrected) RT.com article which made the claim. At the time, we had no reason to believe it was untrue.
In fact, the original source, TASS quoted Red Crescent officials describing the incident of six patients with breathing problems, who had not been exposed to any toxic agents. A more detailed accounting by TASS reveals this incident took place in January, with respect to a different alleged attack, and had nothing to do with the Saturday incident.
The International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent’s Lebanon branch says they are unaware of any statements by the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC) on the Douma matter. They also note that the SARC was not operational in Douma as of the date of the attack. It appears no such statement exists, one way or the other, on the Saturday allegations.
When Politifact contacted us to question this, we had found we had made a mistake. In the future, we will not use foreign news sources as the sole source for important articles like this.
We at Antiwar.com apologize for the mistake. We strive to provide the most accurate, and up-to-date information possible.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- US Tones Down Rhetoric, Actions Ahead of North Korea Summit - April 24th, 2018
- Trump Threatens Iran as Deadline to Withdraw From Nuclear Deal Looms - April 24th, 2018
- Trump Again Backtracks on Syria Pullout, Vows 'Strong and Lasting Footprint' - April 24th, 2018
- West Seeks to Bypass Russian Veto on UN Moves Against Syria - April 24th, 2018
- House Lawmakers Offer Alternative War Authorization Proposal - April 24th, 2018