With the United Kingdom stepping boldly into the latter half of the 20th century and holding its first televised political debates, the face of the normally staid British political seems to be changing rapidly.
Long a de facto two-party system, when Labor PM Gordon Brown’s stock began to fall precipitously last year it was assumed this made Conservative leader David Cameron a shoe-in for the next election.
But the real winner of the debates wasn’t Brown or Cameron. Rather, polls have showed a large plurality of British voters prefering Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg to either of them.
Clegg, seen by many as an outsider, is running on platform of dramatic cuts in the size of government, scrapping the nation’s massive new nuclear weapons scheme, and perhaps just as importantly, an independent British foreign policy.
Openly dismissing the “special relationship” with the US as outmoded, Clegg is campaigning for an end to the days of UK foreign policy being “joined at the hip” with America’s, condemning the Iraq War as an example of “Tony Blair and Gordon Brown doing America’s bidding.”
The LibDems were considered an irrelevant third party, Clegg’s performance in the debate and the growing public dissatisfaction with the foreign policy of Labor and the Conservatives has changed all that. As the campaign comes into the home stretch, the possibility that Nick Clegg will have a lasting impact on Britain’s foreign policy seems to be growing.
wow, is Britain having a Ron Paul moment?
Stepping boldly into the latter half of the 20th Century then?
They had so recently been still been in the latter half of the 19th.
Perhaps the Chinese can show them the way to the 21st.
The second televised debate will be focusing on foreign policy. This may prove to be interesting, because Clegg's party in Parliament voted against the war of aggression on Iraq. Once the war began, they were quick to abandon their opposition, but they seem to have gained some limited credibility for their initial principled stance.
About time too. It would be sweet if Japan and the UK span out of the US orbit at the same time. That would leave the US in its death embrace with Israel, if'n the Ron Paul moment goes nowhere.
Sadly, I recently read an article that indicated most British voters would be basing their vote on domestic policies like the economy, rather than foreign policy. Still, it's good to see some of their political candidates taking a stand on being America's poodle. Now, if only we in the US can convince more of our leaders we aren't joined at the hip with Israel.
Ideal coalition govt: LibDems and the BNP.
Like Obama, the banking criminals will take Clegg aside and have a little fart to heart about how things are. You see? Like Obama he will have to show his loyalty to the Master Class and ante up on the failed course Brown and Blair have been on
And on and on it will go___
I had high hopes for the Lib-Dems early in the century, but it seems their domestic policy stances hurt them as did their unfortunate about-face on Iraq. As a result, I haven't followed them for several years. It will be good for the UK to have at least three functioning political parties again, although my personal favorite is George Galloway and Respect. If Labour can get it's head out of its arse and jetison its neoliberals and neocons, then it might be able to make a comeback with a heavilly Green manifesto; but until then, it's as dead as the Tories.
My local Lib Dem MP was wittering on in his newsletter about how we need to be giving our boys in Afghanistan more helicopters, invisibility cloaks, and evil-discriminating bullets. The usual damn-the-war-support-our-boys nonsense. He didn't explain why he believes that more helicopters will help 'win', nor what 'winning' would be, nor why we need to 'win'. So it's hard to vote for such idiocy, which is why I won't be voting for it. The Greens are the only party that are unequivocal on the wars, so I'll be voting for them. http://www.greenparty.org.uk/policies/policies_20…
The best thing in the world for Britain would be to abandon the so-called "special relationship" with America. The problem for the smaller parties is the most unfair first-past-the-post system.
He may not win, but at least he should get Britons thinking…
Can you imagine how grateful the Queen would be to have a genuine progressive as Her new prime minister? No more having to listen to the Blairs and Browns of this world explain why Her soldiers are dying in foreign lands to help the US consolidate its empire.