Earlier this week, reports were raised by Iranian Foreign Minister that a new nuclear agreement with the US was possible, and that it would include Iran accepting once-voluntary limitations on its civilian nuclear program.
On Wednesday, Iranian officials wanted to be clear that this proposal
wasn’t for Iran to make a bunch of concessions for free, and that if the
US wanted a deal above and beyond the P5+1 deal, they’d have to “pay more” to get it.
That likely marks the end of this proposal, as the US hasn’t been
willing to pay at all, even for things agreed to under the existing
deal, and they’ve always conditioned the demands on Iran as ultimatums,
as opposed to offers for exchange.
This is probably bad news for the survival of the existing deal, as even
though it’s still on the table the US isn’t coming back to it.
Moreover, EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini told reporters that
it is “becoming increasingly difficult” for Europe to remain committed to the deal.
The biggest obstacle to the deal’s survival is that the US has blocked
sanctions relief, particularly from EU companies, and the EU has yet to
ensure its companies are free to do business under the terms of the
pact. Mogherini, however, faulted Iran’s reversible measures to increase
their civilian program’s scope, which Iran has been very public about
only doing to try to kickstart negotiations on the sanctions relief they
were promised but never received.
Iran: US Would Have to ‘Pay More’ for Nuclear Deal With More Restrictions
EU envoy says keeping deal intact 'increasingly difficult'
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×