US and French officials continue to present the UN report on the chemical weapons attack in Syria as vindication for their narrative, insisting it leaves “no doubt” of culpability. Russia strongly disagrees.
Russia, which has insisted all along that the rebels could’ve been behind the strike, notes that the UN report makes no attempt to assign guilt, and added that there was no proof for the Western allegations.
“We have very serious grounds to believe that this was a provocation,” insisted Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, and while there’s no proof of that either, the situation remains extremely murky.
Indeed, the UN report’s data raises a lot of questions, with the evidence pointing to a much smaller attack than the US was claiming, meaning that US narrative claiming the strike was too advanced for the rebels to carry out is no longer the case.
In may 2013 the Turkish border police arrested 15-17 terrorist wanting to export sarin gas into Syria, this month September 2013 a court in turkey border town concluded in their finding that the arrested terrorists were in business in using the sarin gas in Syria. And they have done just that killing 1800 men women and children. These are sworn enemies of humankind with a different understanding than they, these barbarians are nothing but barbarians as their masters in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, those who supported and supporting them are criminals as they are.
Where does the "1800" come from?
The evidence that the attack was a provocation by the Syrian insurgents comes from a number of independent sources, whereas Obama/Kerry's "evidence" for the supposed responsibility of the Syrian government comes from their mouths. True, there was supposed to have been a smoking gun SIGINT intercept, but someone in the intelligence community leaked that it had doctored by the Zionists. The unmistakeable determination of the warmongers to have their war is truly astounding. They push ahead with the most brazen lies and assertions. They even brush aside with the most reckless disdain the possibility of a showdown with the Russians and Chinese. What sort of evil is it that acts so openly, so boldly?
Part of the UN report stated that one rocket was 630 mm long and another was 330 mm long. It seems unusual that the Syrian Army would have used mismatched rockets when they have plenty to choose from. The rockets were fired from an area that is in a sort of no-mans land, rather than from a firmly held Government position. The report doesn't say whether the Sarin was military grade or home brew. It's a strange world when we trust the Russians more than our own government.
The UN report stated that the environmental samples from Moadamiyah were mostly of head scarves, pillows, etc. and no sarin/GB and not much breakdown chemical was found; while at Zamalka the UN team tested a lot of rocket parts and found sarin/GB and breakdown chemicals. Yet biomedical tests of people at both locations showed exposure to sarin/GB. Why didn't the team test much (if any) rocket debris at Moadamiyah? Is it possible that there was no chemical attack at Moadamiyah on 8/21 and that sarin-exposed victims from somewhere else were brought to Moadamiyah where they were then tested by the UN team? If there was no sarin attack on Moadamiyah, the Human Rights Watch dispatch of 9/17 would have only 1 flight path, not 2, and no point where the 2 paths intersect. The attack on Zamalka would have been the only sarin attack verified by the UN team, and it could have originated anywhere along the line running from Zamalka to the west-northwest, including territory close to Zamalka that was neither government-controlled nor rebel-controlled. http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/09/17/dispatches-map…