The lobbying effort to convince Congress to authorize a planned war on Syria is heating up, and Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel will be holding closed-door meetings with senators to try to get them on board starting Tuesday.
Congressmen are overwhelmingly suggesting it’s going to be a “tough sell,” and while there’s a whole week for them to try to change minds, the early counts suggest they’re not even close, particularly in the House of Representatives, where overwhelming public opposition has a large bloc leaning no.
With experts saying the administration’s “evidence” is flimsy, there is little reason to think they can coax the “on the fence” voters onto the pro-war side with these meetings, despite the administration’s official claims that they are confident of winning.
There aren’t a lot of backers except for the usual hawks who vote for every war, and the efforts to hype Sen. John McCain (R – AZ) as having been “won over” is particularly silly, since McCain has been loudly demanding war against Syria for years.
Indeed, among those unquestioning hawks, there’s been no small amount of annoyance that President Obama decided to bring it to a vote at all, for fear that they’re not going to win. Kerry’s suggestion that the president had the “right” to attack Syria even if Congress told them not to may well be an effort to placate the hawks.
But it also risks alienating the rest of Congress quite a bit. Large numbers of Congressmen were demanding a say on this war, and for the administration to agree to give it to them but then imply it doesn’t matter is just one more slap in the face to the notion of oversight over the executive branch.
The wording of the resolution is also a subject of major debate, as while President Obama has claimed his plans were for a very limited series of strikes he requested open-ended authorization for broad military aggression against Syria.
Some are suggesting they might try to narrow the scope of the resolution as a compromise, but experts have been cautioning from the beginning that the idea of the US attacking Syria for a little bit and then stopping was extremely naive, and the president’s claims to have the power to attack whenever he wants without Congress suggests anything short of a firm rejection is going to be spun however the president wants. It’s going to be a long battle, but particularly in the House the threat of voter backlash at another new war is a powerful motivator.
Antiwar.com urges all readers to contact their Congressmen and urge them to vote against attacking Syria. Click here for contract information.
AIPAC will be working overtime.
Haaretz, the esteemed Israeli newspaper, already stated that.
Congress is loyal to Israel – not America. They will not hesitate to obey their master.
Obama has no support . That's why a phony "professor" and Obama lover pose as 'progressives” posted a FAKEaudio:"Former Iranian President Slams Syria for Gassing own People: Sign of deep Divisions in Tehran". How he knows this is Rafsanjani’s voice? This is exactly like the Ben Ladin audio where put on the internet after the 9/11 where in fact made at the CIA BASEMENT TO FOOL the public that “THIS IS OUR EVIDENCE THAT BIN LADEN DID IT”. Is the “professor” in the service of the same organization? Cole claims the audio says: “Bashar Assad gassed his own people”. Dr. Assad does not need to kill babies, like your lover DOES, to be a leader. Assad is resisting your thugs and terrorist for more than 2years. Your Evil Empire needs lies and killing to survive not Assad. But the world , including American people, slowly but surely, are waking to bring down your police state. Please expose the fabricated NEWS by an Obama lovers in order to fabricate “support” for an evil. http://www.juancole.com/2013/09/president-gassing…
This is where the NSA and their ability to sift through all electronic data will work for Obama. How much bad stuff do you think they have gathered on Congress in order to make them vote the way they want them to.
The Minnesota Legislature is turned upside down with this vote. (D) Rick Nolan is fiercely opposed and got into a nasty argument with Kerry. Conservative (D) Collin Petersen is opposed while usually anti war (D) Keith Ellison supports Obama. Michelle Bachman is adamantly opposed while (D) Betty McCollum was at first opposed is being swayed by Obama. (D) Tim Walz is undecided but wonders why we have to be involved.
Micelle Bachman adamantly opposed is a big surprise. For the first time ever Michelle Bachman and I agree.