The UN Security Council remains deeply divided over Syria, and in particular the proposal yesterday from Turkish officials to create a “safe zone” for refugees inside Syria to escape the civil war without fleeing the nation outright.
The meeting for the UN Security Council to discuss the proposal itself was sparsely attended, with only 5 of 15 members even sending ministers to the meeting and two, France and Britain, using the meeting to push for war.
Russia and China are both extremely skeptical of any plan for UN action inside Syria, fearing that as with the Libya “no-fly zone” resolution NATO will use it as an excuse for a full-scale war of regime change.
And indeed, even the idea of a “humanitarian zone” is deeply politicized, as the US has openly talked about using such a zone inside Syria as a base of operation for the rebel factions, primarily a safe zone for them and not for displaced civilians.
Syria will end up like Iraq if the U.S. is allowed to intervene. By the time the U.S. is finished with its imperialism, the world will be filled with destroyed nations and warring tribes.
Should someone mention to the Yanks that perhaps they should stay at home and try to restore their own failed country rather than destroying multitudes of others.
But looking at the cheering, vacuous dolts at the GOP Convention the other day, I'm not holding my breath!
Asking the US to mind its own business is like asking a shark not to eat you! It's against their nature.
The war that Turkish government endorses starting to bite the regime, there are to many people wanting to move out of the reach of barbarians and other mass murderess and barbarians, they trusted Turkey to help out when they started supporting these terrorists, now the reaction is that Turkey not only cannot
afford to help out but is screaming for help for at there are to many people coming into Turkey, why don't this Sectarian Turkish government asks Not So Much Angela Markell, or for that matter French Hollandes or that Swedish government to send more money and more money instead of all that weapons to continue this war.
Ooooooooo…..
Please keep me posted about "arrogant Assad's" eventual defeat….as it has been predicted (by idiots that is) by all of the "experts"…. I'm on the edge of my seat…
When will Russia, China, India, 'benevolent' Iran, et al finally realize Assad is an "Evil Doer" who must be done away with for the 'greater good' of humanity…
This isn't 'brain surgery' here 'people'….Gaaaaaaad………….
What is taking so long "people"……..????????????????????
Lol……
NATOs "Save zones" fakes are well known from Yugoslavia !
They are save heavens for NATO-sent terrorists and traps for staged slef-made massacres, they are using to get a reason for their "humanitarian bombings".
In the last "save zone" in Srebrenica 15000 muslim terrorists were "protected by UN troops" . They killed thousends of Serb vilagers in the region around Srebrenica and urged Bosnian Serbs (Karadic and General Mladic) to protect the people there. UN tanks were attacked with stones by Serb people, but media in NATO-countries never reported why. The muslims military justified their raids on Serb villages around Srebrenica with the need to supply the refugees in the Srebrenica enclave.
When Maldic came and assured the military a save surrender, they preferred to escape trough the Serb lines and of course received fire. Only those are the deaths of Srebrenica – no civilians at all, except those men in-midst the military. And many did reach muslim Bosnian territory alive, despite getting their NATO propaganda grave as "Srebrenica massacre" victims !
Why not saying this, when promoting new massacres, terrorist protection and wars here at antiwar???
We very well know what those faked UN "safe zones" mean in reality from Srebrenica !
It is a save zone and a weapon supply base for he NATO -terrorists !
In the SREBRENICA "save zone" were 15,000 Muslim fighter who did permanently raid Serb villages and kill thousands of Serb villagers. Their "excuse": they had to feed and supply the muslim refugees in Srebrenica !
These MASSACRES IN THE SAVE ZONE was the reason that Karadic did sent General Mladic to save the people. But it was a trap planned long before.
When Mladic entered Srebrenica and offered the military a save surrender with laying down arms, they preferred to escape trough 45 km the Serb territory and were of course shot on their way. Also mine fields and even collective suicides (according to Muslims) happened. These were the real Srebrenica deaths – soldiers and some civilian men among them, but no massacre of unarmed civilians. And many did reach Muslim territory alive – nevertheless they got their NATO graves as "Srebrenica massacre victims":
For your information:
… that an Intervention of NATO in Bosnia-Herzegowina only could be possible, when the Serbs would enter into Srebrenica by force and massacre at least 5000 people" Source: Investigation commission of the French National Assembly, which was issued in November 2001.
or a similar statement (protokol) of UN secretary Kofi Annan zu Protokoll. In a report from 15.th November 1999 he spoke about an "internal meeting with the bosnian(-muslim) leadership on 28. and 29.th November 1993 … , where President Izetbegovic would have declared: You know, Clinton offered me in April 1993, that the Chetnic forces (Serb forces) could take Srebrenica and provide a massacre of 5000 muslims, and than a military intervention (of NATO) could happen.
or
Hakija Meholic, former muslim chief of police in Srebrenica, confirms, that US-president Clinton, suggested as reason of an NATO intervention a massacre in Srebrenica.
(bestätigt, daß US-Präsident Bill Clinton dem Moslempräsidenten Alija Izetbegovic bereits 1993 als Grund für das Eingreifen der NATO die Variante eines Massakers in Srebrenicas vorschlug.)
translated from German:
: »Wißt ihr, Clinton bot mir im April 1993 … an, daß die Streitkräfte der Tschetniks (Schimpfwort für Serben) Srebrenica erobern, ein Massaker von 5000 Muslimen begehen, und dann könne eine militärische Intervention geschehen.«
Stop this fraud
Stop such massacres.
Why does antiwar promote such hypocrisy?
Want to see a surprising "Srebrenica massacre" video?
2:54 fake massacre with training ammunition/blank bullets – do you see any bullet hole in the back? Its only the blank bullets exhaust you see, and 3:32 the resurrection http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7eLuamXUGk
US defense industry had to make wars after the break down of eastern military block. Peace and no enemy is deathly dangerous – so the government decided to make war or at least revolutions against all former soviet partner countries – this has been proofed:
"wars against former soviet client states" since no Russian intervention is expected.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY2DKzastu8&feature=p...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-TZxI8m8ss
US-made fake OTPOR revolutions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=en&v=lpXbA6yZY-8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5vGnnx6or8
This is yet another excuse, just like the so-called "truce" earlier, to allow anti-Assad forces time to mobilize with full air cover. Notice how the no-fly zone in Libya magically became the no-drive no-do anything zone on the ground. I didn't know tanks and buildings were known to fly before but they certainly do once hit by air to ground missiles. To say it's to protect civilians is another bald-faced lie.