This week’s mid-term election victory by the Republican Party sets up a major series of foreign policy clashes with the Obama Administration, as incoming congressmen eye battles on a number of fronts with the hawkish administration. But not the good kind like you’d want.
Rather the GOP congressmen are expected to try to out-hawk Obama as much as possible, fighting against the new START treaty on nuclear arms reduction and attempting to worsen relations with Cuba, Iran, and North Korea.
Beyond that, the battles center around an aforementioned effort to keep the Afghan war going as long as possible and to keep the military budget growing at the alarming pace that has already brought the nation to the brink of bankrupcy.
Given his enthusiasm for endless, escalating warfare it may seem difficult to outhawk President Obama, but by attacking his stated positions (the same stated positions that netted him a Nobel Peace Prize) instead of his actual, starkly different policies, they seem poised to forge an even more jingoist Congress ready to take even the most cynical lip-service to peace and blow it up into a sign of weakness ahead of the 2012 election.
1,428 thoughts on “Republican to Challenge Obama on Foreign Policy”
Yeah, the Republicans are pure evil. I don't mean that sarcastically.
Perpetual warfare is a key tenant of fascism. The Repugs are even more obnoxious fascists than Barack Bush.
The funny thing is how fucking fake and outright wrong the Repubs are!?! They care nothing of the US all they can do is talk shit. This very article is written with a slant that substitutes truth with outright lies, then tries to justify their false ways> Obama is still going to be the best President in the History of the United States. Why because I said so. Obama said he would be out of Iraq and we are. So what is this article even talking about. The real losers are the American People. Cause any victory for Republicans is a loss for the lot of us. FUCK ALL DOUCHEBAG REPUBLICANS. They know nothing, never have, never will. Racist? Rednecks? Republicans. Enough said.
Put differently, the GOP are going to provide exactly the political cover Obama needs/wants/has been counting on.
How can the Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility when they support two expensive and needless wars that they started and a gross military budget that is greater than the next 16 or 17 countries combined. The country is going bankrupt. We barely avoided a depression. Nothing is manufactured here anymore because it is all made in China. Bush and Tony Blair were trying to bring back the colonial system of the 1800s in southwest asia and it did not work.
Peace is a bad word now. In the 1980s when it was about middle-class house wives trying to keep their kids from being wiped out in a nuclear war it was okay. But now when it is partly about finding a peaceful solution to the war in Afghanistan it is suddenly " radical". They don't care because the war will not affect their sons and daughters because it is being fought by the kids of the working class and minorities while their kids are off to college.
The evil party versus the really evil party…
I like that. That's really good. It's always gonna be like this until the US defaults and ends up like germany where they were slapped with the bill after WW1 or until there is a major revolution in the United States.
Why do you always hint that you look forward to violence or revolution?
Don't you like peace?
Current events mark future trends.
Yes, so we can't expect more suicide bombs and terrorist attacks if we don't deal with the muslim extremists.
We can expect Israel to be destroyed and hopefully the muslimextremists will play a role in that.
You keep saying that. But your allah isn't strong enough to win over the Almighty.
It's not a matter of memetics, it's a matter of finance andmacro-economics. The US is bankrupt so that means the bandit state ofisrael is finished because the US will no longer be able to supportit. No more foreign aid to Israel which means that regime will fall,much like the soviet union fell.
And Haman thought the same thing back thousands of years ago.Yet, their Almighty keeps them.
It's a matter of science. Not memetics and religion.
Hey Keith is stupid, we're only at 450 on how many comments have gone back and forth on this story. I bet we could go for 750, we're way over halfway. Can't you come up with another lie for us to argue about? Come on, it can anything at all.
That Tagalog is the dialect of the universe, that allah is strong enough to win over the Creator Allmighty, you know any such foolishness at all!
Don't go all coward on me now!
You stupid iranian muslims, you just don't do well in debates, do you?
Or should I asked those nuclear scientists?
Is this before or after Schalitt is released?
After the gaza massacre. After the theft of land in 1967. After theracial policies saying not to sell land to non-jews.
Yes, and your fake god allah isn't strong enough to win over the Almighty God of the Jews.
fuck the jews and fuck your fake god. I am an atheist. God is aninception of the neolithic period. We no longer live in the neolithicperiod. God was always the sun. The sun was an important tool toprimtive societies.You god yahweh is the devil
Right and the Goat must love you for it.We both know you're in the tank for islam and Iran, why lie about it? Al Taqiyya when lying is not needed seems like a waste of effort.Be Proud!
I'm in the tank for the fucking jews to be kicked out of America andthe fucking jews to have a real holocaust happen to them.
Yes, but then you advocate genocide.Your muslim is showing.
And so do you. You just advocate it against innocent people.
Not innocent people.Just the ones working to kill my country.
jews. Oh ok. At least you're on the right side now.
No, muslim extremists.And that is the right side.
No it's not. jews have been causing terror for 5,000 years. Muslimsnever did anything.
Only since their founding. Even the first person to write the koran did more than the typical jew of today.
Muslims invented math and science and the scientific method so I don'twhat the fuck you're talking about. Muslims are dirty jews too. SO Idon't care about those bastards.jews have been kicked out of every nation since time immemorial. Youcan't say the same for muslims.
No, the greeks did. And what exactly have muslims invented in the last 1000 years?Not a thing.Development stopped about the time the library in Alexandria was burned down.
Muslims invented Algebra and developed the scientific method.
And then fell into a static state and have been passed by the rest of the world in the time since the 7th century.
There are still muslim scientists and mathematicians. I mean, when thejews and Americans aren't murdering them.
And I notice you didn't list anything invented or developed since the 7th century.How sad for your culture.
There are too many to list. I have done the research.
So, you can't make it up on the spot like you normally do?Ha!What an idiot.
I don't make up anything. You're just a troll. A dirty troll. I knowthe information like the back of my hand. That's the problem you got.
You make up everything.And you do it very badly too.Especially for a muslim who is raised with Al Taqiyya.
You're wrong you dirty troll
Unlike a third world mud hut kind of guy that bows several times a day, I not only wash but use soap probably made with rendered pig fat.
I not only wash but use soap probably made with rendered pig fat youdirty lying stinky murdering muslim. You're just using al taqiyya onme.
Ouch, I'm so wounded. I am getting to you.This is fun!Now, would you like a pork rind?
See, you're a troll and a dirty muslim using al taqiyya.
Looking into a mirror?
Are you looking into a mirror?
I thought so.Life is so cruel when you're a loser.
Life is so cruel when you're a loser.
You would know.So, stone any rape victims lately?I was just sitting here thinking about Neda.
So, stone any rape victims lately?I was just sitting here thinking about The Palestinians being rapedand murdered by the dirty hook-nosed jews with nukes.
But he wasn't and you were only dreaming.And if they had, you would have been jealous.So, stone any rape victims lately?
So have you stoned any rape victims lately? I was just thinking abouthow that dirty jew jonathan pollard stole millions of US documents andgave them to Israel and Israel gave them to the soviets which resultedin the deaths of thousands of American people.Now the dirty jews are asking for him to be released. Yeah, we'llrelease him, after we execute him for treason you can have him.
And how does that help any muslim rape victims?By pointing out that the west isn't perfect all you do is show that you're even worse. Even in that scenario papers were stolen. In mine a poor rape victim is killed for nothing she did.How typical of a persian iranian muslim.
Americans were murdered in that scenario because a jew committed treason.
If soldiers were murdered, it was the enemy pulling the trigger that murdered them.
Soldiers weren't murdered, American spies were murdered. Pollard isresponsible. he is in prison and will rot there.
And are you bragging or complaining?
I'm complaining. Jonathan pollard is a traitor to these united statesand deserves to be executed.
Then what is your point?
You are a terrorist.
And you know that how?If you're going to make up things at least make this original.Are you going to say I murdered all the muslim dinosaurs or something?
Because you admitted it.
I admitted that you claim I murdered muslim Dinosaurs?When exactly did I do that? When we were sitting having dinner with Schalitt?So unreasonable your bunch is.
You admit that you are a terrorist all the time. Stop telling me thisall the time.
So, you don't want to sit as a wonderful peaceful muslim in Israel and have dinner with Schalitt and his family so you can prove your peaceful intentions?
Are you talking about that terrorist who illegally occupies land thatisn't his and thinks all non-jews are cattle? He's a terrorist. Heshould be executed or imprisoned. You talk like an Israeli. You'veexposed yourself. Only stupid insane Israelis bring up Schalitts namelike you do. You're forgetting to mention jonathan pollard. Don'tforget to ask to free pollard in your nonsense.
That would be muslims who think all non muslims are pigs and monkeys.Good try, but the propaganda isn't working.Want to try a new one on me?
The only one using propaganda is you. jews see non-jews as cattle AKAgoyim. The goyim are to be slaves to the jews.This is documented by hundreds of researchers spanning thousands of years.
Me? You're the one saying Iran refines atomic material to treat the cancer patients.That was funny, I bet eve you smiled when you said it.
That's not a lie. That is what the evidence proves. The enrich uraniumin accordance with the NPT and the IAEA. This is contrary to yourpropaganda I know but the truth is different than your propaganda.You are the one using propaganda. Obviously. You are immersed in it. Iam very thankful that I am not completely clueless and lost like youare!!
So, if it's not a lie how are all the cancer patients doing?
How would I know? I don't live there. I live in America.
Yeah right.Another stupid lie from a stupid iranian persian muslim.
You're a stupid muslim living in IRan
Really, does that mean I can't enjoy music any more?That I have to start beating my wife and stoning rape victims?
I don't know. Muslims never did anything to anybody. If you are amuslim that is ok. I respect your people.
Of course they did.And you respect no one unless they hold you at the point of a gun.
Muslims never did anything to anybody. Your people are good honest people.
Of course they have. Even if you just count the pretend country of Sudan they murder and kill constantly.You have heard of Sudan, haven't you?
Muslims aren't doing that.
Of course they are.Did your iranian computer freeze up and make you just guess at random for an answer?
Is that all the message your could get out thanks to the slow performance and the quirks that keep popping up?
You have no proof. There.
Yes, and I proved it. Double there!
You have no proof on anything. Only lies and propaganda.
I have had all kinds of proof.You just don't like it being wrong again. This must be so hard for you.http://www.omniglot.com/writing/coptic.htm
People in Zimbabwe have their own language and writings does that makethem a different ethnic group from the blacks in America? No They areboth Racially black.
Each tribe in Africa has it's own ethnic origins.Keith, don't look more stupid than you have to.
African-americans are ethnically african yet have their own language.
Ebonics.And once again you prove you're a moron.
No english. They are ethnically African but they have their ownlanguage give to them by conquering europeans.
So, you are that clueless.I'll bite, what name are you making up for this 'pretend' language? Farsi?
You're too stupid. Stop responding to my comments troll.
Oh, I'm soooo mean.Like those imaginary British people perhaps?
How are those cancer patients doing?
How would I know. I don't live there.
Ah, so you admit it's not going to cancer patients.Nice to know you realize the things you say are lies.
I don't live there.
Sure we know we can believe you, just ask the pretend Copts and that make believe Britain.
You have no idea what you are talking about. You are just a troll.
Of course I do. I just make up pretend countries like Britain and Israel and even the pretend people in Egypt who have been there 4,000 years. You know, the pretend Coptic Egyptians?
The people in egypt who are christian are racially no different thanthere Muslim counter parts. They are both arab and semites who havelived there FAR Longer than the fake jews and their bandit state.
But they are, they are the ancient Coptic Egyptians. You do realize Egypt is a real country and not pretend, don't you?
The christian egyptians and the muslim egyptians are the sameethically and racially.
No, but most ethnic Egyptians are members of Christianity. But the DNA and religion are two different things.Why don't you just admit arab invaders conquered the Byzantine empire and Egypt was part of that?
Most ethnic Egyptians are Muslim! Why don't you just admit that youwere wrong. The byzantine empire conquered the previous empire!Christianity is a recent religion compared to the religions theAncient Egyptians practiced.Arabs are Semites they lived there for thousands of years before theByzantine empire. The romans preceded the Byzantine by hundreds ofyears. They weren't Christians and they were in Egypt. Egypt was partof that. .
No, the arabs are muslim. The ethnic Coptics are either dead or Christians that are being killed.Muslims, they keep reverting to type.
The coptics are ethnic arabs. The muslims are ethnic arabs
No they are the other guys, the ones that belong there.
There is no difference from the Copts and the muslims other than theirreligion. Ancient egypt had black and north africans there. As well aswhites and many other mixed race people.
Yes there is.http://www.omniglot.com/writing/coptic.htmBoy you are stuck on stupid aren't you?
There is no difference ethnically or racially from the muslims inegypt or the christians. Christian is not a race.
Yes there is.Another case I proved you wrong and you're too stupid to realize it.Just like most muslim persian Iranians. Did you notice that motorcycle following you this morning?
No you're wrong. You have no evidence to back up your claim. Muslimsare not a race. Semitic Arabs live in egypt today and they lived therefor thousands of years. Whether they are muslim or christian isirrelevant.
I never said muslims were a race. I said Coptic Egyptians were a distinct ethnic group of ancient Eygptians.You just can't keep up. Typical muslim. Are you still stuck in the 7th century too?
Yes you have. You confuse religion with race. You think muslims are arace and you think christian is a race. Coptic Egyptian only meansChristian Egyptian. They are STILL semitic. They are still arab.
I confuse nothing but you.
You prove that you confuse religion with race.
I prove that you are confused and my sensible answers leave you there.I have never claimed Christianity is anything other than a religion. That muslims are not a race, and that Coptic Egyptians are a very distinct and proud ethnic group going back to the dawn of civilization.How can you be confused by that? Oh, it would be admitting you're confused and the words are too big for you.
Coptic = Christianity. Christian is not a race.Coptic people can NOT be people from the dawn of civiliazation becausechristianity was not around at the dawn of Civilization. Sun worshipwas .
Coptic=Ancient Egyptians descended from the time civilization began.Christians=a religion most civilized parts of the world have valued that still influences the value on life, dignity and liberties.
Nope. Coptic = christian.Chrisitan = genocide and murder.The ancient egyptians are ethnically semitic/arab. The muslims livingin Egypt are ethnically arab/semitic.What race are the Muslims in Egypt?
No, coptic does not equal Christian. They just are all smarter than muslims and worship the true God.
Yes it does.ou.Remenkīmi en.Ekhristianos, literally: Egyptian ChristianChristian is not a race. Neither is Muslim. It is a religious dispute.Not a racial dispute because they are all Arab.
See, it's two words. Egyptian Christian.That would mean one qualifies the other. Not just Christian, not just Egyptian but both.That would mean that Coptic Christians are simply Christians of coptic descent, from the times of dawn of civilization.
You are saying they are Christians of christian descent. Like I havesaid time and again. Christian is not a race.Christianity does not start at the dawn of civilization. There arereligions that precede Christianity by thousands of years. The AncientEgyptians were ethnically Semitic and religiously Pagan. The fact thatthey became Christian means they were conquered by a christian empire.There was no Christianity at the dawn of civilization so there were nocoptics at the dawn of civilization. The races at the dawn ofcivilization were semitic. Some even say they were black.
No, I'm saying Egyptian of Egyptian descent who happen to be Christian.See, there are two words.CopticChristian.The first means where they came from as a ethnic group.The second narrows that down even further into religious belief. It takes two words to say that.And you just can't count that high, evidently.
You're wrong. Christian is not a race. Coptic means Christian. You are wrong.Most of the descendants of the Ancient egyptians are Muslim.
The evidence is clear that you are confused. You can't tell thedifference between religion and race.
I know the difference and have tried to explain it to you.At least you remembered a couple of words out of all that. I'd hate to think it was all a complete waste.Oh, this is you I'm talking to. Of course any information is just wasted.I am still laughing at you.
You don't know the difference between religion and race. You thinkchristian is a race.
The only thing I confuse is you.And I am still laughing at you.Have you been treated for your turrets syndrome?
You think christian is a race. That is how stupid you are.Christianity precedes Islam but They are both Semitic/arab.
I have never suggested Christianity is a race.All I confuse here is you.
Yes you have. Every time you say the coptics are a ethnic group youare saying Christian is a race. Christian is not a race.
You still haven't provided proof that the copts are different raciallyfrom the muslims who are descendants from the ancient egyptians.
Yes I have.The big words confused you.But, look at the bright side, you don't have any gays in Iran!
No you haven't. You can't prove something that isn't true. Like Iranhaving nuclear weapons or striving to get one. That isn't true. Irandoes not have nuclear weapons and are not working towards one.
Thousands of centrifuges working for high grade nuclear material. How many cancer patients?A russian reactor they agreed to fuel, and to take and recycle that fuel.Thousands of centrifuges working for high grade nuclear materia, and you say for civilian reasons? I am laughing.Not with you, but at you.
They don't have high grade nuclear fuel. You are wrong. They are notallowed to have high enriched uranium becaue they are bound by theNon-proliferation treaty and the IAEA (The International Atomic EnergyAgency). They only have LEU (low enriched uranium) that can ONLY beused for civilian purposes like Nuclear energy to run cities andmedical isotopes for cancer treatment.
Iran is only bound to the whims and dictates of the immams and clerics.And you are so funny, I still laugh at you.
No, the evidence proves that you are wrong. They are bound byinternational law and the IAEA and the NPT. You stupid hick.
Then what is the loss when thousands of your high speed centrifuges are defective? You have enough for medical purposes, and Russia has offered to supply you with the nuclear fuel for civilian use.
They can't enrich uranium for medical isotopes you stupid hick. Youdon't even know the details of the plan. Iran would enrich the uraniumto about 3% they would then give the fuel to russia or brazil, theywould refine it to medical isotopes and give it back to Iran. Theyactually already AGREED to that plan. They can do whatever they wantwhen it comes to enriching uranium for peaceful purposes. They canmake a straight swap.
So, you admit they aren't worried about the cancer patients.This was never about medical uses for nuclear material.I am still laughing as you wipe camel spit from your face.
They can enrich uranium for medical isotopes. But the CIA and Mossadare trying to ruin their peaceful program.
Why aren't you emailing more people working on the nuclear program? All the stuff that is clogging up your computer needs to get out there, there is work for it to do!
You are a troll
Coming from you, I laugh.
Like the muslims and infidels?Only I don't remember Jews beheading any reporters.
Nope. jews behead and slaughter all non-jews. They have been spreadingplagues and killing prophets for years. jews are evil. They are theworst pieces of shit in the world.
Then how do you explain palestinians living a better life with less poverty inside Israel?
They don't. They are thrown in jail and tortured. They are not evencitizens. You stupid jerk. Only jews are citizens in Israel. Israel isa jewish state. You stupid idiot hillbilly red-neck.
Only if they break laws.But the arabic muslims living in Israel have all the rights of any citizen.
The laws they break are not being born jewish. That is the law thePalestinians and the non-jews are breaking in that evil bandit stateof israel.There are no arabic muslims that are citizens in Israel.
There are lots of muslim arabs in Israel.Or as you call it, the 'pretend' country of Israel. They even have pretend people in the knesset.
There are no muslim Arabs in Israel. Israel is a jewish state.Non-jews are not citizens.
Yes, the pretend state of Israel does have arab muslims as citizens.Afu Agbaria, he's in parliament and a muslim arab.There with one name I proved you a total muslim.I could keep going and prove you a foolish iranian.Hamad Amar is another. Should I go for three and rub in the fact you're of persian descent?Mohammad Barakeh, is that a jewish sounding name?This is just way too easy, do you want to find their districts or anything?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arab_members_of_the_KnessetOh, I can guess where this is going, you're going to say that wikipedia is 'pretend' too. Yeah, good luck with that.
They are no citizens because israel is a jewish state.
There are, and you just can't stand it to be wrong.I understand, I've had spoiled kids misbehave where I could watch before. Did you throw temper tantrums as a child too?
No they are not. Israel is a jewish state and non-jews are not citizens.
Yes they are, and you can't keep them from doing it!
No they are not.
Yes, they are. And you know it.
You know you are wrong
I know I proved myself right and you a liar.http://www.omniglot.com/writing/coptic.htmBut it's easy, you are so bad at it.
The native americans adapted a new language after they were conquered.Does thay make them ethnically English? no!
And does the muslim sharia forced language make muslims smart? No….
There is no muslim language you stupid hick. Muslim is not a race.
Arabic seems to be the unifying language that muslims study. You know the language that the real koran is written in?Of course persians don't have to like that entire arab thing, I understand.
There is no unifying language that muslims study. There is no muslimslanguage. There are arabs who are christian. They are arabs who arejews. There are arabs who are atheist.Arabic is a language of a people. Semitic/arabs have a language called arabic.
Yes, there are arabic scholars so that students can learn all the subtle nuances in the ancient koranic manuscripts.You just dont' want anyone to Saudi Arabia. Persians are weird that way.
Muslim is not a language or a race. You can't understand for somereason. Must be all the inbreeding
No, their inbreeding hasn't bothered me any. But then I'm not confused all the time like you are.And since I never claimed they were a race, that leaves me laughing at you.
You inbreed because that is what hicks do.You infer that christian is a race and muslim is a race.
I just bowed to your superior knowledge on Iran and if you insist they have hicks I won't argue it.And I never infer that a religion is a race. But I also never let you get away with saying Coptic Egyptians aren't the real descendants of the ancient Egyptian culture.
You can't tell the difference between religion and race. When youspout ignorant things like there is Apartheid in egypt becausechristians are persecuted I have to show you with proof that you arewrong. Copt is a sect of religion. They are racially semitic/arab.
I can tell the difference, the only thing I confuse here is you.And the arab muslims are persecuting the ancient Coptics who are mainly Christian now, that would be apartheid.
Christian is not a race so it cannot be defined as Apartheid. Like Isaid before, you are confusing race with religion. The Coptics areArab as well. The only thing that separates the semitic Coptics andthe semitic Muslims is Religion. They belong to the same race.
But the Coptics are, and it is apartheid.You can't just change what words mean when you don' t like it.
You don't know the difference between Religion and race and you don;twhat Apartheid is.
I know, and I even explained it to you. I even provided links on the Coptic people suffering under oppression and apartheid by the muslim arabs. You just get confused and want to scream. You must scream an awful lot.
Yo provide links but you don't provide proof. There is no Aparthiedbecause most of the Ancient Egyptians are MUSLIM.
The links are the proof. And that's more than you ever provide.
Proof of what? That you are wrong and fail in providing evidence tosupport your claim? In that case you're right.
Proof that islam is full of violence. That coptics do indeed go back to before Alexander the Great, and that your goat has been taking secret video's of you two and posting them on line.
Poor little keith. You can't just make up what words mean. Coptic is the ethic group, Christian is the religion. Arab is the ethnic group, muslim is the religion. And one group can practice apartheid on another group for any reason they want, when they outnumber the 10-1.So, you are wrong, again.I am still laughing.
Coptic means Christian. Christian or Muslim is not a race you stupidhick. You are wrong like always. Coptics are still Arab/semitic youstupid idiot.There is no such thing as a coptic ethnic group. Just like there is nomuslim ethnic group. You're wrong again. You're wrong because you callthe invasion in the 7th century a muslim/arab invasion. It was aMUSLIM invasion, not an arab/semitic invasion. But there was aCHRISTIAN invasion before that. History is abundant of people invadingand assimilating and conquering and being conquered. That is whatcauses mixed race peoples and that is why we are all mixed mongols.
So, are you against the jews driven from Jerusalem in 1949 have no right of return?That the Coptic Egyptians have no right of return for the land stolen from them?Which indiginous people exactly should have that right of return and how should it be decided? You're not going to go apartheid and decide based on religion are you?
The jews were not drriven from Jerusalem they left of their ownaccord. They were in Germany and America thieving and stabbing nationsin the back. jews are a cancer. They spread through nations and rotthem from the inside. The jews have no right to return because theywere never driven out. They left of their own volition.The Copts are not a real people so they are irrelevant.The palestinians have the right to return because they live in refugeecamps and concentration camps today and they have a right to the landthat was taken from them illegally.
The only problem with that is the facts.Remember Masada? Their homeland was taken over and they were being killed.
Masada is a myth. They never had a homeland. They have always beendispersed throughout the world. They were back then and they aretoday. The Canaanites were there before the jews anyway. The jews werein egypt and dispersed in egypt, rome, persia, babylon etc. theyspread like a cancer infecting all the great nations of the world.
No, it's a site and the ruins are still there.The fact you are a mighty persian nation, now that's a myth.
It's a myth. They didn't all commit suicide. They're liars. All jewsare liars so what they say or claim is a myth.There was a jewish-roman war. After that we part company.
Like the myth of a persian empire?It's true, but you don't want to admit it.Just like you are ashamed of Caliph Omar burning down and destroying the library in Alexandria.
Persia was an empire just like rome and the byzantines and the Babylonians.Caesar destroyed the library. Look at the evidence.
And so did Caliph Omar.
No evidence supports you nonsense.
Sure there is.All kinds of evidence, including the fact that Alexandria is there, but not any library…http://www.bede.org.uk/library.htm
Caesar burnt the library down.
And the rebuilt library was destroyed by Caliph Omar.You just can't deal with facts, your cleric won't let you.So, any centrifuges running at the right RPM's yet?
No it wasn't. stop lying.
Of course it was.And speaking of lying, How are the cancer patients that were going to be treated by the nuclear program? How many millions and millions of Iranian cancer patients have been healed yet?
Iran has a legal right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. Theyhave a legal right to obtain nuclear fuel and medical isotopes forcancer research. Just like the other 153 signatories to the NPT. Whydoesn't Israel sign the NPT? Get them to surrender their nukes.
Oh, so no more talk of all the cancer patients?
What? I just mentioned it. Medical isotopes. Didn't you hear?
I hear just fine, I just know enough to not believe.There is a difference between the two. Fiction has it's place, but not when you pretend it's real.
It's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of what you can prove. TheNPT is there, the IAEA is there and the documents are there sayingthat Iran has a legal right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.Nuclear fuel for energy is just fine. As is medical isotopes to healtheir sick.
There is also the cancer patients you claimed this would cure.What happened to them? Are they well now?Did the centrifuges heal them before the virus took everything out?
Every nation has a right to pursue cancer research.
Yes, and I'm sure the cancer patients are all lined up around the bashar reactor waiting for chemo.Oh, did the computer problems slow that down? How interesting, someone must hate iranian cancer patients.
Is that how it works in any country in the world? No it doesn't youfucking moron.Do American cancer patients line up around their nuclear reactors? No.They go to the hospital.
Yes, but I'm not the one who said we had nuclear reactors to cure the cancer patients, you did in Iran.
Every nations does you moron. You don't think America has nuclearenergy and radiation treatment to cure cancer? You are stupid. Youthink that nuclear is synonymous with Nuclear bombs and nuclearweapons. That is like saying steel is synonymous with guns.Nuclear does not mean bombs or nukes or weapons. That is whyEisenhower help form the IAEA and the UN developed the NPT. Becausehundreds of countries including Iran are interested in the atom andthe clean energy and medicine it can provide.154 countries to be exact. Iran being one of them. Israel india andpakistan not being part.
We have nuclear medicine, but we don't pretend our weapons are the same.And all those centrifuges are for one thing, highly concentrated nuclear material, you don't need that for civilian power generation or medicine. You need it for weapons.Don't think you're fooling anyone.How are those centrifuges doing? Any more burn out yet?
You have nuclear medicine. So does almost every country on earth.Including Iran. Iran has proven that they only have enough nuclearfuel for peaceful purposes. America has nuclear weapons, Iran doesnot. They're not pretending anything. The IAEA and the NPT all make itvery clear that Iran only has a peacful nuclear program.Centrifuges are used by all countries to enrich Uranium. You need toenrich uranium for civilian power generation and medicine you stupididiot. How do you think Uranium is created? By magic? How would youcreate Nuclear power and medicine without a centrifuge you fuckingidiot.There is no proof or evidence that Iran is enriching Uranium forweapons. All the evidence says that Iran is enriching uranium forpeaceful purposes. They have even come out and said repeatedly thatthey are not interested in nuclear weapons. America has nuclearweapons, which I might add were invented and created by dirtyhook-nosed jews! The descendants of christ killers.
Including Iran, so that was never a real excuse for the reactors.You just admitted it. What a loser.
Reactors are needed to have nuclear medicine and nuclear fueldumb-ass. Nobody stands in line at a fucking nuclear reactor just likepeople don't stand in line to get water at the water treatment plant.Do you think people in Iran or the US stand in line at their nuclearreactors? America has nuclear weapons. Iran has nuclear energy andnuclear medicine. Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons like America andIsrael do.Every country has nuclear reactors. 154 countries, Iran being one ofthem who are signatories to the NPT, have nuclear reactors to enrichuranium for their economy and for cancer research. Medical isotopes tobe used for radiation.
No, they don't. Only weapons need the high grade fuel.And we don't have sick people pretend they are the reason for our nuclear program.
Iran doesn't have high grade fuel you stupid monkey. A nuclear programis used to enrich nuclear fuel for medicine and energy.Sick people and demand are the reason for a nuclear program. That iswhy 154 countries in the world have a nuclear program. 154 countriesin the world have a nuclear program are you gonna sanction all ofthem?
No they don't, especially with a bunch of defective centrifuges!And the world is a safer place because of it.
Defective centrifuges? 154 nations that signed the NPT and areinspected by the IAEA have centrifuges. Every country that has anuclear program has centrifuges you stupid monkey.The world would be a safer place if Israel would get rid of IT'Snuclear WEAPONS!Even if Iran did not have defective centrifuges they would still beonly enriching uranium to well below weapons-grade level. They have toby law. They signed the NPT and are inspected by the IAEA. TheIranians only enrich uranium to about 3.5% That is well below the 90%needed to enrich for high-enriched uranium. They have a legal right tohave Low-enriched uranium. That is their right. By law they have aright to create and posses LEU (Low-enriched Uranium) No where in Irando they have Highly enriched weapons grade plutonium. They are notworking towards a nuclear bomb. Those are the facts.But even if they DID have nukes, or even if they WERE trying to getnukes, so what? Who are they gonna use them on? Israel? Israel hasthousands of their OWN nukes. Pakistan? Pakistan has their OWN supply.India? They have their own supply as well. America? America hashundreds of thousands. I wouldn't mind if Iran has as many nukes asIsrael.
You just keep going in circles.All the stress of keeping your nuclear scientists safe must be getting to you.
Whatever. I stand by the truth and the facts. You stand by the liesand the war propaganda.
No, you don't stand by facts. You make up facts.And that's what we in the west call propaganda.You know a refuge for losers.
You can't make up facts. They stand on their own. Mine are facts. Youare locked in on the war propaganda.
And you think that copts aren't real people.Shows how false your facts are.Good luck with that.I'm sure Neda would understand you.
copts are not a race. Christians are not a race. There is no apartheidin Egypt. You are making stuff up.
You know little muslim boy, there is breaking news from Egypt even as you sit here making things up.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12101748Kind of proves you wrong that muslims don't hurt anyone and are nice people.And also proves you wrong about copts being real people.Once again, you still are a loser.
Copts are not a race. They are a religion. Christian is not a race.Muslims don't do anything bad to anybody. Coptic orthodox church. Thatis religion. Not race.
Yes, they are. Try reading the story really slow.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12101748
Copts are egyptian christians. That means they are Egyptians(arabs)racially and Christians religiously. Their is no Christian gene ofChristian race.
Copts are the ancient Egptians most of whom are christians.But the reason you say 'Coptic Christians' is that the two words are for two different things. One identifiies their ethnic origins, the other their religion.This really is so hard for you, isn't it? No wonder Caliph Omar destroyed what was left of the library in Alexandria he was just as dense and threatened by facts as you are.
Most of the Ancient Egyptians were pagan and most of todays egyptianswho are descendants of the ancient Egyptians are Muslim. There is noapartheid because only one race is involved. Arab. If there isreligious intolerance then that is up for debate.There is no christian gene so the blood of the Ancient egyptians isthe same as the Muslims. MOST of the Ancient egyptians are muslim. 10%of the Egyptians are copt. Copt just means Egyptian christian.
You still jump to the 'wrong' wrong conclusions.There were the ancient Egyptians who converted to Christianity, and then there were the invading muslims who destroyed all their culture and history. Just like Caliph Omar that destroyed what was left of the library in Alexandria.It's not open to debate. It's clear you are nuts and can't accept reality. But that's all the charm you muslim deny'ers have.
Ancient egyptians did not convert to christianity they were invaded bychristian terrorists and the christians destroyed their culture andhistory!Ancient egyptians today are muslim
Can't you make up anything better than that?None of it's true, but I expect that from you.But at least try to be entertaining!
Christians came in and invaded and pillaged and forced convertedeverybody that ran into their path. This goes for Cortez and every”Christian” nation. The byzantines, the romans etc. Christians FORCEDthe natives to convert. Ancient egyptians were PAGANS first.
But when Cortez did that in the name of Christianity we was going against the Bible.When muslim extremists kill in the name of the koran they are following it.See the difference? My religion is peaceful at heart, yours if violent at heart.
Mr. Ditz – Doesn't this reality which you speak of expose Raimondo as a fraud for advocating voting Republican in the recent election in the name of non-intervention?
raimondo is a fraud mired in the false left right paradigm as if either party offers any solution. he's also fantastic at propagating the fairy tale of 9-11. if any person is stupid and deluded enough to think that either corrupt corporate party has solutions when they are in fact the problem should be floated out to sea on a ship of fools.
The Republicans and the Democrats keep the Mutt & Jeff act going.
Well this really turned out to be the absolute worse case scenario for us. These next 2 years will make Obama look like he really was the peace candidate and really did deserve his nobel… Clearly WE know this isn't true.. But these next 2 disastrous years will ensure Obama's reelection in 2012 so that we get another 4 years of the Obama style war mongering with a friendly smile.
I was hoping that this Obama presidency would enlighten a lot of people that the Republicrat and Demopublican parties are one in the same, both vicious and war hungry.
This little turn in the plot will certainly swing things back to D again in 2012 and the war mongering will continue, as it always does, with absolutely no attention yet full justification because the Big O said it was the cool thing to do.
America is on a train to disaster.
Anybody — Raimondo included — who seriously advocated voting for Republicans or Tea Party candidates in the hope of non-intervention is/was crazy. Here is one brightish spot from the elections: the Blue Dog Caucus of moderate (read: Reaganite) Democrats was destroyed — falling from 54 to 26. At the same time, the Progressive Caucus (all Democrats, of course) fell, too, but only by about 4 from an original total of circa 88. So, the Democratic Party just shifted left — its time to wake up and smell the coffee. We do have a 2 party system, and we should get busy kicking the rest of the Blue Dogs over into the Reaganite slime of the Republican Party — regardless of any further lunacy about peace-loving Rand Paul and his idiotic, racist, sexist and homophobic father.
Do American dictionaries include the word 'peace'? Does anyone over there know its meaning?
Do most Americans know the meaning of love, generosity, love, sharing or are they words that have lost their meaning too due to greed and warmongering?
Yes, our dictionaries do include the word 'peace.' And we know what it means over here.
To suggest that Americans don't know the meaning of the word 'love,' that we aren't generous or that love and actions of love have lost all meaning for us because we are 'war mongerers,' only proves how little you know about America and Americans or, perhaps, you're getting your information about us from the liberal news media.
Either way, you're incorrect, but you appear to be content with fabrications.
Take it up with the biologists.
I don't believe you. I don't believe you have the open-mindness northe capacity to understand the beauty and wonders of nature and theorigin of life. I don't believe you are capable of listening or payingattention. You're too biased and stuck in your biases.
You don't have to believe it for it to be true.And convincing you of something I did growing up is not high on my list of things I worry about.
I concluded that you do not have the open-mindedness nor thecapability to understand things based off of your past comments. Ideduced that you never had the maturity to really engage in a “meetingof the minds”. You never really countered a professors evidence withevidence of you own.
I was open minded enough to check. Not open minded enough to let my brains fall out.
I have made my position clear. Read my previous comment. Go talk to aBiology professor. I don't know why you keep coming to me for adviceand help. I HAVE friends. I'm not lonely.
And I have rebutted each of your 'previous positions'. Including that islam is a religion of peace.
Go talk to a Cleric. Why tell me about your biases and theories?
I explain the fallacies of your biases and theories. I have really not gone into my own ideas other than to show why yours are wrong.
Don't tell me about you biases and theories. GO tell an Imam.
Why, islam is not a center for learning, in the 7th century perhaps. But no new learning has been built on to that.
Only through communication are you gonna be able to bridge the gap.There are a billion muslims in the world. You're gonna have to learnto live with them in peace. Talk to them about your troubles. Hold ameeting. Become the change you want to see in the world. Maybe youshould stop killing muslims all over the world. That's a start.
And that billion muslims live under sharia which means they are commanded to force me into submission.That means some day we will have to fight them.
Talk to an Imam so you can learn from each other. You obsess overIslam. There are a billion muslims in the world. They are not goinganywhere so you are going to have to learn to live with them. Everyoneelse has. I have. There are muslims in my town and they are notblowing anything up. They work hard.
And that billion muslims live under sharia which means they are commanded to force me into submission.That means some day we will have to fight them.
Perhaps you should learn from an Imam what Sharia law is.
I know what it is. There is learning out side of madrassas.
Are you an Imam? Because Unless you are an imam I don't think you knowenough about Sharia law. You should study it before you judge it. Talkto an Imam. Don't talk to me about it.
It reveals it's character in every suicide blast, every car bomb, and every murder in Nigeria.You don't have to be a cleric or retarded imman to read the news.Do you ever throw rocks to help stone rape victims?
“It reveals it's character in every suicide blast, every car bomb, and every murder in Nigeria.”A true example of bias detailed in this ignorant statement. Whatabout every child cured of the flu? every student taught how to read?I see how biased and propagandist you're being. Notice how you allegethese things but you don't talk about the Muslim Teachers or theMuslim doctors.
Every child cured of the flu? islam doesn't cure the flue. In fact most muslim nations fight curable disease with no understanding of innovations from western countries. You ignorance about the benefits of circumcision in african males is proof of that. Students taught to read? 80% of muslims are illiterate.The facts are not biased, but they expose islam for the forced submission that it is.http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/Q_awake/ch4p6.htm
I know plenty of Muslim Doctors and Teachers first hand. I've workedwith them talked to them, got to know them as human beings. They'relovely people. You don't mention the Muslim doctors that healchildren, the muslim teachers that teach children how to read andwrite etc. etc. You are biased and a propagandist.
Yes, and can those muslim doctors treat their female patients properly? You know examine them while looking?I know muslims are human beings. Human beings programmed by forced submission. We have a muslim couple at work, I've seen how 'moderates' treat their women.
I have worked with Muslims and find them to be wonderful people. Nodifferent than some of my christian co-workers. Some of my so-calledchristian co-workers are often very offensive actually.
You also live in a country where they claim to have no gays (Like this country) because they stone them.You also live in a country where you have no rape victims. They stone them.That is not nice people.And if my religion, as the Bible dictates it, offends you, I consider it a compliment.
I haven't seen any of the things you describe in the muslim co-workersI know. I haven't seen any of the behavior you describe. You arejudging and being an ignorant close-minded, bigot.
So you don't notice.You haven't looked very hard for it then.I am factual and realistic.And that bothers you.
I know that that is not the case. I know that most people want thesame things in their lives. They want clean air, clean water, a goodway to support their families and the best for their families. I knowthat what you say is untrue based on empirical evidence.
No, they don't.That's why muslims march with signs that say things like “death to the infidel”.The best way to support your family is not to leave them in Yemen and go on jihad and plan terrorist attacks in cargo planes.Just another typical extremist?http://insidethemiddleeast.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/08/is-yemen-crying-al-qaeda/What Christian group is out building bombs simply because they think all muslims deserve to die? (in the last 1000 years)
I don't see any muslims doing any of the things you assume. I don'tsee muslims doing anything but struggling to get by, raise theirfamilies teach schools and cure diseases.
Then you are using tunnel vision.In mosques, what part of the place are women allowed in?Or you don't see that too?
I am just using empirical evidence. I have observed muslims workinghard, raising their families and trying to get a good education. Justlike black people and mormons and buddhists.
And I use facts.So, I leave you in the dust every time.
Your “facts” don't match with the muslims I have encountered. I can godown to the local supermarket right now and talk to my friend Muhammadand he will not do anything bad. He will check my items. That's aboutit.
My facts match with muslim teachings.Sharia, giving forced submission since the 7th century.
I have talked to muslims and they are god fearing people just likeChristians. You are just a bigot who wants to believe in these fairytales because they fit your agenda.
Quick, stone the rape victims!http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/10-26g-04.aspThis is not the same God I serve. I serve a God of justice and mercy.You serve allah a weak pretender god who can't manage a victory over His people.
” I serve a God of justice and mercy.”That is the god of the jews christians and muslims.You cannot judge people. That is left for god. right?
the god you serve has you stone rape victims.You can say he's the same but our God would never, ever, ever command us to stone rape victims.
The god of the muslims and christians and jews are the same. Go andask any theology professor and they will agree with me. DOn't take myword for it. Go to your local college and ask a college professor.Islam, Judaism and Christianity come from the same area, worship thesame god and were invented by the same group of people.
No, the god you serve under 'forced submission' is completely different in nature.
If you don't believe me talk to a theology professor. He/she will tellyou that Islam, Christianity and judaism all come from the same areaand all have the same god and the same prophets. Christianity has along history of conversions through force. Cortez for one. In the NewTestament it says to convert the pagans. Most Christians believe thatproselytism, understood to be sharing the Gospel, in word or in deed,of Jesus Christ, is a responsibility of all Christians. According tothe New Testament, Jesus commanded his disciples to “go and makedisciples of all nations”[Matthew 28:19], generally known as the GreatCommission.
I have.You don't do well with english as a second language.And the values of the god allah are totally different than the values taught by the Judeo/Christian Almighty. We value life.So, when we work on the great commission we send medical missionaries, not terrorists to bomb planes.See, that's different in goals and tactics.
Then you know I'm right. You don't know what you're talking about.There is tons of empirical evidence of christians massacring andcommitting genocide. The values of jehova are pure evil! The proof isin their actions. The values of the judeo/christian god are evil. Pureevil. Christians don't even realize that they are worshiping evil andare a part of evil. You're a perfect example.
I know that I can spot a french accent and that the white guy with black hair you sent a link to had one.I know that Christians have not created genocide in hundreds of years. That the lives they went against the bible to take was far less than the lives we saved with medical missionaries around the world.The values of the God of Abraham are not evil. They are what stand between us and your evil. Muslim evil. The evil demanded from your weak and impotent allah.Stoning rape victims is evil, and it's a representative example of forced submission under sharia.
“I know that I can spot a french accent and that the white guy with black> hair you sent a link to had one.”He did not. You were wrong you just wont admit it.”I know that Christians have not created genocide in hundreds of years.”UH hello? The massacre in Iraq? That was pure genocide by the troopsand they killed a million people.The values of the God of Abraham are not evil. They are what stand between> us and your evil.”The god of Abraham is jehova and it is PURE evil. It has confusedstupid goyim that it is good. You are a perfect example. The god ofthe jews and the Christians and the Muslims is the same god. It is anevil racist megalomaniac god who kills and murders and rapes and thereis tons of empirical evidence to support this and if you don't believeme talk to a history professor. The goyim are the stupid sheep. Theyare the slaves of the New World Order and do whatever the jews tellthem. Abraham is evil, Your god is pure evil. YOur god is responsiblefor more death and hatred than anything else in the history of theuniverse. jehova is so evil that it has ignorant people not evenrealizing that it is evil. That is what evil does. It confuses peopleto believe that they are there to help or protect of save etc.
I know a french accent. I grew up listening to a provincial french accent.You linked to the wrong video.The massacre in Iraq was taking out enemy forces. All they had to do was surrender if they didn't want to die.And no, the God of Abraham is not evil. He never said to stone rape victims.And Jews never use suicide bombs.
Can he teach me how to wipe with my left hand? I think toilet paper is too expensive.
Can we have communication with that billion muslims on birth control? Every muslim country starts to decline as they take it over, and none actually create wealth, other than sucking on the natural resources that cannot be replaced.
I think you are confused with Christianity. Christianity was whatkilled Rome and wherever Christianity rears its head there is darknessand death. Don't do anything it's all in gods hands. That's suicide. Areal man goes out and makes his own luck and success. He doesn't lookup to the clouds he looks to the task at hand.
I think I'm perfectly clear on history. One religion grew with persecution. Rome was killing Christians for a very long time. And Christians never fought back. They never had suicide bombers. They never had jihad against their enemies.Christianity kept music, building, sciences alive, kept education and languages alive. It was the light shining in the darkness.Islam did have caliph omar that destroyed the library in Alexandria.And a real man does make his own luck. A muslim goes out and fights jihad.
You're not perfectly clear on history because you get your informationfrom the bible. Rome was killing christians (jews) because they were athreat to the roman people. They were murderers and liars and commiesbecause they were jews.Christianity threw Galileo in jail and enacted the spanish inquisitionand threw europe into the dark ages. Christianity was responsible formore murder and death after the fall of rome than any thing else.Christianity became the state, big brother big government and killedall dissent. They thought the earth was flat and that the sun revolvedaround the earth. And if you disagreed you were thrown in jail orkilled. Christianity was and brought the darkness.jihad means judgment which Christians do constantly.
No, actually none of what I quoted to you was from the Bible. Doesn't persian history teach facts on western culture?Or does your mosque not allow that?
All of your history information comes from the bible. You didn't quoteanything. You just spewed ignorance like always. Nothing you say isaccurate in any way. It's all bullshit.
No, actually none of that history came from the Bible.Can you find a quote from the Bible that gives any of the history I just explained? Hm? Now the koran has history and all knowledge necessary is in the koran the religion has been pretty frozen since the 7th century. That's why we have passed muslim culture in so many areas in the last, 1,000 years.http://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/scientific-method3.htmYes the church had it's role in the dark ages and wasn't perfect. But you realize in the hundreds of years of the inquisition more people have died in Sudan in the last 10? muslims just are so predicable. Did you read where another suicide bomber killed people in Iran yesterday outside a mosque? That hasn't happened outside baptist churches. There is a huge difference in Christianity with the true God and islam.
Muslims invented math and science so you lose. You follow the bible asyour history. The bible has a fake history of a fake people that rapedand pillaged gentiles thousands of years ago.
And why aren't muslims leading in the sciences now? Why aren't they leading in the space race now?Because they may have been cutting edge for the 7th century… but they are still just cutting edge for the 7th century.
And why aren't muslims leading in the sciences now? Why aren't they leading in the space race now?Because they may have been cutting edge for the 7th century… but they are still just cutting edge for the 7th century.
Because of you. People like you trying to kill them and lay siege tothem. If you would leave Iran alone they could probably reach thestars. If you left the Palestinians alone they would have their ownright to self-determination. You dirty lying troll.
Oh, I'm so horrible. Just like those 3,000 9/11 victims. Just showing up for work in a civilian target. No wonder muslim extremists were so threatened and wanted to kill them. Actually showing up for work! Well, it's all clear to me now.
Those 3,000 americans were killed by jews but they weren't innocent.They're tax dollars went to israel where they exterminate thePalestinians every day. Not too mention that they nuked japan andbombed yugoslavia for no reason. The united states was just getting ataste of it's own medicine. They got what they deserved. The US killedIraqi babies. They gave money to the bandit state of israel whichkilled lebanese babies in 1996 years before 9/11. Who cares if 3,000americans died? You act like american blood weighs more than Arabblood. You act like the US never did anything to deserve attacks. Theydeserve MORE attacks!
And muslims danced in the streets. Jews helped uncover the bodies.Good try, but I might let you make up some more lies. Is your computer working still?Those computer bugs are pretty mean to iranian hard drives.
jews brought down the towers.jews were dancing in the streets. Muslimshad nothing to do with it. Besides america deserved to get hit anyway.They got what they deserved. 9/11 was revenge for America's foreignpolicy.
No, it was muslims that were celebrating the towers being attacked.And America deserves no civilian attacks with mass casualties. We stand for freedom, we even allow mosques here, against our own best interests. Your muslim is showing, and I expect that your Iranian is showing too.Revenge on our political system is one thing, murdering innocent civilians is a war crime.
No it wasn't. jews did 9/11 bu the americans deserved it. Muslims hadnothing to do with it. Jews celebrated and they arrested hundreds ofjews who were found with explosives and were controlled demolitionexperts.
It was muslims.Try another lie, that one never did make any sense considering how muslims celebrated and the muslims that claimed credit for it.Most lies are easier to get by with if there is some element of truth to them. So, you are a lousy liar.
All the evidence points to jews. Besides America got what theydeserved. The jews did it though. The evidence points to Israel, themossad, Cheney and bush and the jewish conspiracy.Muslims were the perfect patsies. They had nothing to do with it.Jews celebrated the attacks. This has been proven. It's all been proven.
All evidence points to the muslims who did it, and the al quaida group who helped coordinate it with them.You are so goofy, did a small child help you make things up?
There is no evidence of that. Jews were arrested and admitted thatthey were behind it and had experience in explosive ordinance units.muslims never did anything to the US. Ever.
No they didn't.Do all muslim iranians lie as badly as you do?Boy, how are those damaged centrifuges coming?
Yes they did. They were arrested and failed polygraph tests when askedif they had anything to do with 9/11. They knew about because theywere behind it and planned it.
Oh, you want to be silly and make things up?They arrested 500 terrorists on other planes trying to detonate underwear bombs and all of them had korans and prayer rugs.Are you going to claim they were all muslims too?See, this make up stuff is childish.Facts are so much more mature and sensible, some day you may want to try them.
I'm not making stuff up. I have done all the research. There wereIsraelis who had foreknowledge of the attacks and there were Israeliswho owned the buildings and there were Israelis who were detainedshortly after 9/11 and were eventually released even though they hadfailed polygraph tests.
Yes, you are making things up.And not Israel didn't do the dirty work for muslim extremists who want us dead.
The evidence is overwhelming that Israel did 9/11. They were caughtred-handed and deported back to Israel by our criminal traitorgovernment.
No, the evidence isn't. Only in Iran with a media controlled by the clerics do they even consider just garbage. Everyone else in the world has access to more even reporting and less spin on events that effect muslim interests.
No, not in Iran. In France and America. iamthewitness.comHow would you know anyway? What research have YOU done? You haven'tdone shit but troll. I have actually studiously researched allinformation leading to 9/11 and I have found and my colleagues havefound that 9/11 was done by jews jews jews. Israel to e exact.Israelis were caught red handed cheering and 200 were detained anddeported. They failed polygraph tests regarding on being behind 9/11.the traitor government let them go.
Yes, in Iran.
Daryl Bradford Smith is not from Iran. He's from America. johnkaminski is not from Iran he is from America.johnkaminski.info
And Achmed Muhammed is from Iran. so you're still wrong.
Americans are saying that it was jews. Not Iran. You're wrong. It'snot just Iran.
And Iran says it was Jews when it wasn't.You're still wrong, no I take that back. You're still lying.That's different than being wrong, it's worse. Al taqiyya.
Iran does not say it was jews you filthy liar. France does andAmericans do. Because french and REAL americans know what honor andintegrity and freedom REALLY means!
No, actually they know it wasn't the jews. And here you are an iranian muslim saying it was.More lies, it's all you have. Al Taqiyya.
So you admit that I'm right. Iran does not say it was jews.You're an Iranian muslim. Not me.
No, I don't admit you're right, I admit you lie.And no one of any consequence or intelligence thinks it was anyone other than muslim extremists. You know, that whole Al Qaida thing. And why would you deny being a military man in Iran living in a forced muslim culture?
You just admitted that I am right. You stupid troll.More and more people are waking up the fact that Israel and jews werebehind 9/11!You admitted that Iran does not blame jews. I said that first. Youadmitted that I am right.
No, actually I didn't.Your translator screwed it up.
You admitted that I am right. Stupid.
No, actually I didn't. Go back and read the comment again.You just want to think you're not stupid.A waste of time that is, but go ahead and dream.
You just admitted that I am right on everything you stupid muslim. Youjust said “You're right on everything”.I know this. I already proved it.
I admitted you were a fool that fools no one.
You just admitted again that I am right on everything. You just saidthat I am right and Iran never said jews were behind 9/11.john kaminski does. Is john kaminski from Iran? He's from florida, USA!
No, actually I didn't. I admitted you fool no one.
There you go again. You JUST admitted that Iran never said jews werebehind 9/11 and that I am right about everything.
I admitted you sneezed and lost half the brains you were born with.
There you go again. You JUST admitted that Iran is better than Israeland that they never said jews were behind 9/11 and that America iswaking up that 9/11 was an inside job done by Traitors and jews.
I admit you sneezed and lost the brains (all three cells) that you were born with.
You just admitted AGAIN how Iran never said jews were behind 9/11/
I admitted you sneezed and lost all 3 brain cells. They weren't doing much anyhow, but it still must be a loss to you.
Why do you keep admitting that I am right. I KNOW I'm right.
I know you have a vivid muslim imagination.I know you're 'not' right.
You just admitted that I am right again
See, another demonstration that you are 'not' right in the head.Is it a muslim thing?
I know I'm right. You don't have to tell me over and over again. Youjust admitted right now that Iran never said jews were behind 9/11
I know you're not 'right'. You're in your own little parallel universe with women who are afraid for their lives.
You just admitted that I am right again.
I admitted that you ignore reality.Still.
You lonely lonely lonely loser with no girlfriend to spend the new year with.
Sorry, I just came up for air.What were you saying?
You lonely lonely loser. All alone with no friends. No girlfriend.being reprimanded to trolling. So sad. But it makes sense. What womanwould have you. You're stupid, you're ugly and you're poor. That'sthree strikes and you're out.
No, barely have time to answer your thousands of emails.
That is a lie. You lonely lonely loser. All you do is sit on your fatass and troll. You have all the time in the world. You spent all ofnew years eve in front of your computer like the fat ugly loser youreally are. get a life.
Not a lie, an inconvenient truth.
The evidence contradicts you.
No, it backs me up.
No, you have all the time in the world because you reply to mycomments IMMEDIATELY. That proves you're lying.
Really? In the US we have computers everywhere not just at the approved local mosque and government offices.I can use email from a cell phone if I wanted to.So, your point is as empty as your muslim persian iranian head.
You are too stupid to operate a cell phone. stop lying to yourself.You sit at home like a loser in front of the computer all day in yourtrailer park because you got laid off at wal-mart or the carnivalwhere you work.
Really?And you think that because your goat eats yours and you can't have one?Droid is a cool one, but I really prefer the Iphone.
Stop acting like you know what a cell phone is. You're a dirty lyingmuslim. You play with sand.
I have even seen people using them, it's not just me.Ever hear of the smart phone? It even does texting and emails!
Like you know how to use one of those. You're a dirty muslim. You playwith sand and your dingle-berries.
I even have a bar of soap, I have all kinds of things you don't know how to use.
You don't know how to use a bar of soap you stupid liar.
Not with you watching I don't.
You don;t know how to even think.
I think in circles around you, and your goat too!You always want to settle down with the dumb ones.
How can you think when you don't know how?
Did someone help you with the big word?
You don't even know HOW to think
And I still leave you looking like a slack jaw inbred?
You are the inbred stupid. You're the one that is the southernhillbilly. stupid
You're an inbred hillbilly redneck.http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2621/are-there-inbred-families-in-the-ozarks-appalachians-like-in-em-deliverance
I just love that comeback. It's wrong, but it shows your cleric hates to see you use anything but the approved talking points.
You're wrong. Everybody knows that hicks from the Appalachianmountains are hillbillies and inbreed.
We use it as a joke, but that doesn't meant it actually happens.And we do joke about it in America. Haven't you heard the one “if a couple gets divorced in lower Alabama, are they still second cousins?”Of course, in muslim circles it's true but never gets discussed.Intermarriage, the reason for so many birth defects in the 'pretend' UK.
Of course it happens. It comes from history.
Maybe the history of islam, but not here.It's illegal for one thing. Besides here in the US we can see women and can actually date the ones we like!
History does not support anything you say.
History supports everything I say.History spits on you, and sweeps you under the rug with the forgotten persian empire.
History does not say that noah rounded up every animal. There arebillions of animals that including bacteria that if encountered byother animals will poison them and kill them and eat them. Historydoes not say the earth is thousands of years old. It says it isbillions. History does not say jews are a race or that they are apeople. There is no historical trace of jewish anything.
History does have a flood legend in every culture that has legends.And the Bible doesn't even say Noah rounded them up. It says God caused them to come to the ark. That's a little different than the version you are saying didn't happen.
Legends are not history you stupid hick. Legends exist in everyculture. So does mythology and sun gods.
And your point?Since I never said all those legends were entirely accurate and only pointed out they all agree there was a huge, really bad flood.The Bible as a accurate telling of history just gives the most accurate details.
A legend is not a historical account. Floods happen all the time. Thatdoesn't mean the story of noah is true. I mean my god even 8 year oldkids don't believe in the noah story. If that story is false then theWHOLE thing is false.
And how long have you been suffering from Turret's syndrome?I never said that the legends were accurate in detail. That I save for the Biblical account. But I did say that all cultures that have legends have a legend of a great flood.
TOURETTE stupid.The bible lies and is caught lying. The earth is billions of yearsold. And if we were to follow the bible there would be no dinosaurs.But there are dinosaurs. The reason why dinosaurs are not mentioned inthe bible because the people that wrote the bible who were nomadicfanatics had no idea that the earth was billions of years old. Theywere wrong
Oh, is the medication kicking in? You didn't have to repeat it over and over.And the Bible has not been proven wrong yet.That sure does offend you, doesn't it? Is that because the Creator God is so much more powerful than that allah dude?
The bible is wrong because everybody debunked it already. You are justa troll. You know all of it is wrong and bullshit and has no basis onthe way the world is today. Burning bush? Talking snake? Adam and eve?The earth being 5,000 years old? there being a god? There being achosen people? It has all been debunked. Dinosaur fossils debunk thewhole genesis story.You stupid hick.You don't even know that Muslims and Christians and jews worship theSAME god. You stupid hick. Muslims hold the bible as one of theirbooks. They all come from the same religion.
You are wrong because you're stupid. I'm not saying that as a racial slur, it's just that you're not that bright.And muslims are forced to submit to allah a weak and phony God who can't help dozens of countries when they attack the Jews, the chosen of the true Creator God. You know, the Almighty!So, you are still wrong again. I say that a lot, only because you're stupid a lot.
Allah is jehova you stupid hick. Islam, Christianity and Judaism areall related. They are the same religion. They all worship mary, jesus,abraham, moses, etc. etc.
No, Jehovah is not allah. The two fight against each other and allah wants the descendants of Isaac dead.And we see all the time that the real Almighty protects his children.
Yes it is. Muslims worship jehova/yahweh AKA the god of the jews. Sodo Christians and jews. Muslims Christians and jews all worshipYahweh/jehova.Saying ignorant things like Allah wants the descendants of Isaac deadis saying “Jehova wants the children of Isaac dead”. In other wordsit's saying the god of the jews wants the jews dead. Maybe that'strue. Maybe the jews are spreading perfidy and causing terrorismbecause they are possessed by their god who wants them dead. Maybe thegod of the jews wants them dead so they are doing their duty ingetting killed. Perhaps you're right for once in your life.
No, they don't. Jehovah refuses the kind of worship muslims offer.Stone a rape victim and blame it on my God? I don't think so.
everOn Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Aaron wrote:> There is no evidence of that. Jews were arrested and admitted that> they were behind it and had experience in explosive ordinance units.>> muslims never did anything to the US. Ever.>>>
Of course they did.Are you going to try saying that copts aren't real people, so muslim extremists aren't real people either?
Muslims never did anything to anybody.
That is so laughable I could spit milk out my nose.But I'll just pick on small little thing, the Ft. Hood shooting.He acted as a muslim on the beliefs taught in the koran.You are wrong. How many examples do you want?
Like I said, muslims never did anything to anybody.
But they have, and you didn't show any muslim has ever been harmless.Not even to their wives.
Muslims never did anything to anybody. The fort hood guy was anAmerican soldier.
Of course they did.You know they did.You believe that infidels should die and muslim extremists have done all in their power to make that happen, from Nigeria to the jewish cultural center in Seattle.Just because the clerics in Iran don't like to admit it, that doesn't make it any less true.
I know that muslims have done nothing to anybody.
You know they have.You just know you have to lie about it.I understand, if you don't toe the line you could get stoned.
I know that muslims have done nothing to anybody. You can't prove iteither. fort hood was done by an american. The underwear bomber wasblack under a spell by black pantherism. Might as well say that. Andthe times square bombing was done by the mossad.
Of course they have.And the copts are the victims of apartheid.How are the computers, are you being careful not to accept any emails that haven't been filtered for virus?
Muslims have done nothing to anybody. The dude that killed those dirtyjews in Seattle was an American.Copts are racially arabs.They are religiously Christians. That makesthem NOT the original people. The copts are a cult. Not a people.
Yes, muslim extremists do things all the time.Does the name Daniel Pearl come to mind?Or are you going to say that pakistani tribal muslim extremists were really jews?
Oh so now you say Muslim extremists! Ha! I told you! Muslims didn't doanything to anybody.
Tell that to Daniel Pearl, he's dead and headless and it was due to muslim extremists. They were so proud of themselves they video'd the entire thing.What a bunch of cowards they were, how brave do you need to be to murder a defenseless man tied up and helpless?
Ah ha! You said muslims extremists!I told you Muslims didn't do anything to anybody.
Ah ha! You said that, but I know better, and so do any muslim extremists. Ask Daniel Pearl.
I told you muslims never did anything to anybody.You said muslim extremists. You changed your tone stupid troll.
Yes, you told me that, and it's not true.Daniel Pearl knows better than anyone.
Muslims never did anything to anybody. You even admitted it yourself.
I admitted that Daniel Pearl knows just how violent they are.And you won't even speak up and demand Schalitt be freed.
Why don't they release jonathan pollard? How about apologize forkilling the Rosenbergs?Muslims never did anything to anybody you stupid muslim.
And you refuse to admit Daniel Pearl might have a comment, if he were still alive.And that Schalitt might have a comment if he weren't a prisoner.
Shut up you stupid muslim. Muslims never did anything to anybody.You're people the muslims are not that bad. I know some of yourpeople, they're some of the sweetest people on earth. god-fearingrespectable people. I can't say the same thing about the dirty jews.
Yes they have. Daniel Pearl isn't here because of muslim extremists.And if that's sweet, that explains a lot of your other delusions.
Muslims never did anything to anybody. You even admitted it right now.I know some of your people achmed, they're very nice god-fearingpeople. You're a muslim. Be proud.
And you just pretend that Daniel Pearl was never murdered in the name of islam.And you pretend that Schalitt isn't at home eating supper and watching the evening news.
Muslims never did anything to anybody. Daniel Pearl was killed by men.And that other terrorist is in prison where he belongs.
Daniel Pearl was killed by muslim extremists in the name of their religion.And Schalitt was no terrorist. Unlike muslim extremists he was doing his job according to all geneva conventions. And he belongs home eating his supper.
What a fantasy world you live in! HHAHAHA Schalitt is a terroristoccupying land that isn't his. He belongs in Prison or dead with allthe other occupiers occupying land that isn't theirs. Daniel pearl isa terrorist and a zionist and deserved what he got. At least he toldthe truth before he died.”Not knowing anything about my situation… not being able tocommunicate with anybody… only now do I think about some of thepeople in Guantanamo Bay must be in a similar situation… and I'vecome to realize that…””…this is the sort of problem that Americans are going to haveanywhere in the world now.””We can't be secure, we can't walk around free as long as ourgovernment policies are continuing and we allow them to continue.””We Americans cannot continue to bear the consequences of ourgovernment's actions, such as the unconditional support given to thestate of Israel. Twenty-four uses of the veto power to justifymassacres of children. And the support for the dictatorial regimes inthe Arab and left-wing world. And also the continued American militarypresence in Afghanistan.” – daniel pearl before he was sent to hellby freedom fighters.
Schalitt was a private in a standing army. According to the Geneva conventions he is afforded rights. And Hamas is breaking those geneva conventions by holding him as they have done. If we treated the taliban fighters that way in Gitmo the news would be screaming how horrible it is. Yet because Hamas is barbaric muslims it's not mentioned often. It should be.He is more a freedom fighter than any jihadist. He was even defending the muslim arabs within Israel.
He is a terrorist in a occupying regime that has no legitimacy. He hasno rights when he is occupying land that isn't his. According to thegeneva conventions he should be killed.The hamas fighters are fighting for freedom as are the people ofhezbollah. It's the occupying regime that is the terrorist state.
Hew as a foot soldier, and he is still being held against all international agreements.Hamas is many things, but legitimate isn't one I'd use very often.
Israel is still building illegal settlements and occupying land thatisn't theirs.
And the land Schalitt was kidnapped from, that was not an outpost and they had just withdrawn from Gaza. So, any other excuses you want to try here?
He's a terrorist occupying land that belongs to the Palestinians. Thejews declared war on the Palestinians in 1948. Whatever happens to thejews is their own fault. They are an illegal bandit state that isracist.
According to the british mandate you're wrong.Again.
According to everybody, you're wrong The british mandate is invalid.
It was British territory. They could divide it any way they wanted. And they did.Oh, that must offend your persian muslim sensitivities. Can you imagine if the foreign office had decided to make you part of afghanistan to the east, and Iraq to the west and just erased your country by fiat?
It was not british sovereign. You stupid idiot. The bandit state wasnever ratified by international law.
Yes, it was.You have heard of the British empire, haven't you?
The bandit state of Israel was never ratified in accordance withInternational law. This is fact. They never allowed a referendum tothe people living there on the status of their well being. They justraped and pillaged the Palestinians that were living there forthousands of years.
It didn't need to be ratified, it was given the land by the british mandate who controlled the territory.And the Jews were living there for thousands more years. On both points you're wrong.
It's not valid because it wasn't ratified. There was no vote, no dueprocess, no nothing. They did not allow a referendum to the peoplethat had been living there for thousands of years.You're wrong on all points. The Canaanites AKA arabs were there forthousands of years. The bible was written thousands of years AFTER thearabs (read Canaanites/Semites) were living there. The Arabs werethere first. There is no such thing as a “jew”. just people. Humans.
It didn't need to be. Britain can do what ever they want with their own land.Even allow a country like Iran, even if it makes no sense what ever.
You have no idea what you are talking about. You are beyond reason.There is no point in talking to you because you are not willing tolearn. You are just trolling.You remind me of this quote from your own religion.Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye willdo. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speakethof his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
I tell the truth.There was a british mandate, and the Brits controlled the conquered turkish ottoman empire.Facts are not your friends.
All the time, ask Schalitt and Daniel Pearl.
Muslims didn't do anything to them.
Of course they did.
Muslims don't harm people like jews do.
No, they do worse.
They do nothing bad. I know muslims and they are sweet innocent people.
Then you're lying. Al Taqiyya.Al Qaida, was that a muslim organization that wants to deliver flowers to the cancer patients in Iran?
Al qaida does not exist. It was invented by the CIA. It is an americanoutfit. Muslims have nothing to do with it.
And what about “JMB” in Bangladesh? Are you going to Say Bangladesh is made up too?Or what about Hamas? Are they pretend too?
Muslims have nothing to do with what you are talking about. You're lying.
They have everything to do with it.
No they don't. you have no proof
Yes they do.Al Jazeera even says so. Complain to them. But the muslims are behind a huge amount of violence.
Al jazeera doesn't say that.
Yes, they do.http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/20111316634781484.htmlTry again, they have stories in Farsi and arabic.
Al jazeera doesn;t say muslims were behind the attack.
Yes it does. Read is slower, and have someone help you with the big words.http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/20111316634781484.htmlYou are still wrong.
You are still wrong. muslims don't do anything.
They do things all the time, that was just the headline yesterday, it wasn't the only story.I wasn't sure how many you could ignore at the same time.
It wasn't Muslims that did that though.
Don't argue with me, it was in the story and if you don't like it have Iran complain for you to them.
The story said Al quada. Al quaeda is a fake organization. It's afraud. It was created by the CIA to goad the USSR into invadingAfghanistan. Reagan is Al quaeda. Carter is Al quaeda. They funded themujahadeen to repel the soviets. you stupid hick.
Ah, another fake 'pretend' thing that kills people and only claims to be muslim.Right, and I am laughing at you, again.
Al quada was created by the CIA to repel the soviets from Afghanistan.
And you know this from what? The same people that tole you the coptic people are not an ethnic group?
Arabs/semites are an ethnic group. Copt means christian. Muslimsconquest of egypt is a religous thing. They are still racially arabs
You realize you can lie about it all you want.Coptic is the descendants of the ancient Egyptian race that built one of the earliest civilizations.
Christian is not a race so no, you are wrong. The ancient egyptianrace is mixed. But is known to be Semitic.
I never said Christian was.You must have had too much of the bottle this morning.
Yes you do. Every time you say the coptic egyptians are a race you aresaying that Christian is a race. Coptic means Christian.
No, I'm not. I'm saying Coptic=Egyptian Christian=religionYou don't keep up well, do you?I'm still laughing.
And you are wrong.Coptic = Christian.Egyptian = Egyptian.Most of the Ancient Egyptians today are Muslim
Yes, I am right.Coptic = Egyptian. They have their own alphabet too you know.
America deserves civilians attacks because they kill civilians. Youstand for terror. Ask the rest of the world that hates you.Murdering innocent civilians is a war crime? Then the US is guilty ofwar crimes against the Iraqis, the Palestinians, the japanese, theviet namese, the germans, the aghanis, the chileans, the Ethiopians,the Iranians and the lebanese.
Civilian attacks are not just an act or war, but a war crime according to the geneva conventions.Defending ourselves against military targets is self defense. Is the goat waiting for you, you seem pretty rushed here…
Oh, so then the US has committed acts of war and has committed warcrimes all over the world. Iraq and Afghanistan are an example. Thejews and US are guilty of war crimes according to the genevaconventions.Military targets? You're targeting civilians? That's a war crime.
They attack us, we fight back.That's not a war crime, it's self defense.And what geneva conventions do you 'claim' we have violated?
You break all geneva conventions, you attacked them first, you are theaggressors everybody knows this. This is why the rest of the worldhates america. You were attacking Iraq. They never attacked you.Bosnia never did anything to you. Germany never did anything to you.Lebanon never did anything to you. The Palestinians never did anythingto you. You are the aggressors. You invaded Iraq, you are the onesmeddling and oppressing people. You attack them THEY fight back!
Only thing I know is that iranian muslims can't be trusted or believed.How are the centrifuges working? Did you ever debug the computers enough to try them again?
You don't know anything.
I know enough that I can prove you know nothing.So, you're wrong again. Every single time.
You're just a lame troll. You know nothing.
I know enough to prove you wrong every single solitary time.And all you do is scream and shout the same lies over and over.Maybe in Iran it's just the way the controlled news isn't informing you of so much.
You are just a troll. In Iran they can openly talk about the holohoax.Try talking about the holyhoax in germany or Austria?
I am just someone that tells you the truth, even when you don't like it.
You're a troll.
Why thank you, you're still wrong of course, but it's nice to know I'm making your day miserable.
You exposed yourself as a troll LONG ago.
Why thank you, it makes my day when a liar gets mad about the way I expose them.
You're pathetic. Trolls are pathetic. You are a troll
And you just can't get anywhere against someone sticking to the facts.It must be frustrating for you, do you have a nice goat to help you when you're 'frustrated'?
Do you have a nice goat ready to help you when you're frustrated?
No, in the US we prefer women who are willing and enjoy it.
In the US we prefer women who are willing and enjoy it. Do you have anice goat ready?
Why, it's not like I'm visiting in a muslim country.Are you offering to loan me yours?
It's not like I'm visiting in a muslim country.Are you offering to loan me yours?
Wow, you are learning. You can copy someone besides your cleric!Wow, what a huge step for you.
Wow, you are learning. You can copy someone besides your own cleric.What a huge step for you, you dirty lying muslim.
Keith is a poopy head.He smells of poopy headedness.And he doesn't care.
What a huge step for you, you dirty lying muslim.
Perhaps for you, for me it was like visiting my preschool all over again.If you ever learn big words it would be more interesting here.
shut up you dirty lying muslim.
See, you revert to the classic muslim insults.I wash, I live where we have running water and washing is easy, we even have running hot water in the US. Can you say that in most of Iran?How are the computers coming, debug the virus out of even some of them yet?
You don't wash. You're a dirty lying muslim using al taqiyya.
Did I hit a nerve? Did your goat complain because you stink worse than she does?
Shut up muslim
Oh, you are such a loser.And you'd like if I shut up. Your computer hasn't locked up with another virus outbreak?Maybe we should keep emailing another 20 – 30 times, Just in case you haven't gotten any of it on your hard drive yet.
You would like that.Do you also yell that at rape victims before they are stoned?
Are you saying muslims were 'to busy' to dance in the streets?http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010122112394/editorial/rsn-pick-of-the-day/islam-was-born-out-of-child-abuse-and-rape.html?utm_source=Right+Side+News&utm_campaign=ec30fd1339-daily-rss-newsletter&utm_medium=email
Islam WAS born out of child abuse and rape. It was born out ofjudaism. Judah and lot and David were all rapers and child abusers.
Mohammed was jewish?
Probably. His wife was. jews tired to kill muhammad just like thekilled christ. Islam was born out of dirty jews. Islam was born out ofrape and murder because Jews are rapists and murderers.DUH!
Did Mohammed like to beat her? Or was she forced into submission?No wonder she wasn't happy.
Probably, he was under a jewish religion anyway so it doesn't surprise me.
But he wasn't. He was in Saudi Arabia and he considered Jews equal to pigs or monkeys.
But he was and is. Islam is a jewish religion. It is an outgrowth ofjudaism. He was right about jews though. They ARE equal to pigs andmonkeys. They tried to kill him and they tried to rape his wife. hewas under a jew religion. Just like you are! You and the muslims arethe same people. The respect all the prophets and Christians do to.Muslims hole the bible and the koran to be holy. They see all theprophets as muslims. I say fuck the christians, fuck the muslims andfuck the jews because christians and muslims are jews.
Oh, that's funny. So, why can't Israel have any places of worship in Saudi Arabia, or even go to Saudi Arabia, or let anyone into the kingdom who has had Israeli entry stamps in their passports?
The wahabbi sect of Islam and the house of saud is a jewish family. Soin fact, JEWS run saudi arabia. Saudi arabia is actually a jewishdictatorship and Islam has always been a jew religion.
So, you aren't going to discuss the issues I brought up at all.And no, they're not Jewish.Not persian, but arabic.Have you ever heard of beduins?
Which Palestinian government has that right? Fatah or Hamas?
Hamas. The bandit state fake government needs to be dismantled first.Palestine needs to be freed from jewish parasites.
So, you are against the legacy of Arafat?
Arafat was corrupted just like the american officials. Arafat startedout fighting for his people and their soveriegnty but when you'retalking about the jews you are talking about the most diabolicalpeople on the planet. The most evil and the biggest thieves liars andmurderers.
Now I feel better about thinking Arafat was a lying no good corrupt muslim.The rest of it, you wandered off into koran-land. You know raped virgins that need stoning and all that.
He was later bought off with jewish money. Like all leaders. Bush,Obama, clinton etc. He started out as a leader of his people seekingthe right to return and statehood and sovereignty but he was corruptedby the dirty jews.
He was not, he was bought off by money from men from space and corrupted by the hidden nation under the antartic ice cap!You make up the strangest lies. Did you do it yourself, or did your illiterate cleric help you make that one up?
Lame troll. Lame.
Oh, you just can't come up with any more?
What's wrong Keith, you stopped writing constantly.Are you busy with a new love interest? A sexy new goat or something?Or did a computer virus kill your iranian computer again?Did the cleric realize what a fool you were and make you stop?Or did the damaged centrifuges give you extra work?Oh, I know, the nuclear scientists needed more security and you have your hands full?
Are you saying there was caliph omar in Egypt, and that he didn't destroy the library at Alexandria?Come on, you aren't saying that are you?
He didn't destroy the library you dirty liar. Caesar did. Caesar andhis goons burned tons of books exposing the jews for being thieves andliars.
Sure he did. It didn't collapse of old age you know.
It collapsed and caliph umar had nothing to do with it. Caesar did it.Umar was a great leader like Hitler was.
So Ceasar was alive during the reign of Caliph Omar?
Come on, are you not claiming Caliph Omar as a loyal muslim?
A loyal muslim is the same as a loyal american. Loyalty is a goodtrait as far as I'm concerned.
Yawn, right and the sanctions are only effecting civilians in the capital. That's not the comment of a loyal atheist american to me….
I never said that. The sanctions effect americans and Iranians and theglobal community. It makes everybody poorer. Stupid. You don't evenknow what sanctions are. Sanctions like they did to Iraq for 25 yearsonly hurt women and children. Economic sanctions work both ways. Youdon't buy Iranian oil then you are poorer as well. You have to pressharder for Saudi oil and african oil. You stupid retard.
Yes, you did.You get mad, get frustrated over the goat sneaking away and you lose your temper and say things your handlers don't like you to divulge.
No I didn't. You're a dirty jew muslim christian liar.
Yes, the civilians are effected in the capital…You do lose your temper regularly. So, are the computers having trouble with that suxnet computer virus again?
Sanctions against countries always hurt the innocent. Like thechildren in Iraq and the families in Cuba and the children in northkorea. Look at north korea. The il family is STILL in control afterALL these years even though we have put countless amounts of sanctionson them. Look at cuba. We have sanctioned them to death. Sanctionsdon't work.
Then the leaders of those countries should act responsible and not bring sanctions down on them.
No, the US shouldn't sanctions innocent countries and innocent people.The US should be responsible and not bring sanctions down on Iran whohas not done anything wrong at all.
Humanitarian aid was allowed into Iraq.If the people suffered it was thanks to their corrupt government.Oh, I get it. You are just trying to avoid more sanctions in Iran!
No there wasn't. There were attempts to bring aid into Iraq but theIsrael lobby prevented the US from being friends with Iraq just likethey're preventing the US from being friends with Iran.
See, there you go again. Making things up.Actually (I want to try now) Iran kept us from having any ships go past the straight of hormuz and starved 15 trillion iraqi children who were begging their clerics for food, but being the horrible muslims Iran is, they didn't care.Did I do it right? I”m not used to making things up.You're the expert on that one.
I didn't make anything up. I have done the research. The Israel lobbywas the reason why the US was hostile to Iraq and Iran in the FIRSTplace. Sanctions on Iraq were illegal and criminal and violated thegeneva conventions and the US is being destroyed for all the warcrimes and terror it has done over the world. The US is crumbling likethe soviet union did.The Israel lobby is why the US goaded Iraq into invading Iran andgoaded Iraq into invading Kuwait.
Of course you made it up.Now you just don't know how to admit it.And if the US is crumbling, it's because of a closet muslim.
The US is crumbling because they have more jews in their country thanany other nation in history.I have done intensive studious research and know the information likethe back of my hand.
No, it's your extensive ability to lie.Even if we have jews, and we do… you haven't shown they are a bad thing.You just say so and expect me to believe you. Why? Lies don't sell well here.
I don't lie. Jews were behind 9/11 and they lied us into Iraq andthey're trying to get us into a war with Iran and they killed 3,000americans on 9/11 not too mention for 5,000 Years they have beenkicked out of every nation they have settled in. They killed 300Americans aboard the USS Liberty and I have done the research on this.You have not. Everywhere jews go they are hated. They were hated inRussia and the jews killed 66 million of white russians. The russianrevolution was a jew revolution. In Israel they kill and rape innocentpalestinian children and women. And if you're a christian or a muslim,they tried to kill Muhammad and they succeeded in killing Christ.Christians savior.
You do lie, and blame the Jews for everything.They may not be perfect, but they have not done these things.Muslim extremists do, and you don't own up to that, and claim to be proud of the things they do in the name of their religion.
I have done the research on all of these things and all of thesethings are 100% the truth. They lied us into Iraq and they lie aboutIran having nuclear weapons or aiming to get nuclear weapons. I don'tlie and I blame the jews because they're the ones doing it.
Either you lie about doing the research,or you're lying about the results. But the facts do not agree with you.
How would you know? You haven't done any research on anything. You'rejust a troll.I have actually DONE the research. You haven't.
Yes, I have and I even send you links.Of course you ignore them and lie and say they're not accurate. It must keep you on the right side of a cleric with a big pile of rocks behind him.
You haven't done any research. Not at the depth and diligence that Ihave. You are a troll.
Yes I have, you don't even believe that the holocaust happened as it did.
You lying dirty troll. The holocaust is a lie and I proved it.
No, you proved you lie and like to revise history.I proved it did happen with photo's from the time it happened, the places it happened.You do realize each and every time your computer accessed email and the web you risk a virus don't you?
I proved that the holocaust is a lie. You proved you lie and like torevise history. You stupid muslim.
No, you didn't prove it. You said it, but then I answered with web sites like this.http://fcit.usf.edu/HOLOCAUST/people/liberato.htmYou said that people there were liars, and then made up more lies. It wasn't very convincing. How about how many outside emails would your computer require to reload a virus I wonder?
I proved that the holocaust is a lie with mountains and mountains ofevidence. I provided facts and pictures and sites like thisholocaustdenialvideos.comThere were no gas chambers, there was no final solution to exterminatejews. jews were persecuted but who cares? jews have been persecuted byeverybody for thousands of years and will continue to be persecuteduntil they give up their dirty back-handed hook-nosed ways.
And with that one link I showed you are a liar that is not in touch with historical reality.
no, you stupid monkey. You showed a link of concentration camps. Iknow the germans had concentration camps you stupid monkey. Germanyhad labor camps and so did America. Six million jews did not die andthere were no gas chambers. This has been proven. I have done all theresearch on this years ago.
Back to the insults. I would rather be a monkey than something lower like persian iranian muslim fool.So, you want to go on the hajj but have to bathe first? Wow, what a bummer.
You're a persian iranian muslim fool. You're also a monkey.
Better a monkey than a persian iranian muslims.And no, I'm not a monkey. Aren't you supposed to call infidels pigs?
No, you're also a persian Iranian muslim.
No, you are you poopy head.See, I can stoop to your level too, but not on a prayer rug.
You're a persian Iranian muslim but that is ok. It is not an insult.Muslims are the sweetest people on earth and I like them. Your peopleare a lot better than those dirty jews. Don't ever stop fighting thejews Achmed.
I'm not sure that Schalitt or Daniel Pearl would agree.Even if the one is still alive, he doesn't have the freedom to have a choice, does he?That kind of proves you wrong, now doesn't it?
Daniel pearl knows that are illegal support for Israel is what killedhim. Our support for the Apartheid state of Israel is what causes ourproblems in the middle east.
Daniel Pearl knows that muslims don't even bother keeping their swords sharp.
Daniel pearl had to learn the hard way that what goes around comesaround even for the jews. Daniel Pearl learned the hard way that Oursupport for Israel is why the rest of the countries in the middle easthates us. Muslims hates us, not because we are free or rich, becausewe are NOT free, or rich. They hate us because we have been supportingIsrael.
You are so stupid. Daniel Pear was a reporter there to tell the muslim side of the story. He was a liberal Jew that thinks the hard line americans aren't nice enough to muslims.And they slaughtered him anyhow. Do you realize a chicken killed in a halil fashion would have suffered less than he did?Muslim are barbaric animals.sharia is not the best the 7th century had to offer, just the most stubborn.
Daniel Pearl learned the hard way that the reason why Muslims hate theUS government is because it supports Israel.Do you realize that jews slaughter and rape and pillage thePalestinian people and throw dissenters in prison breaking all genevaconvention laws?
Daniel Pearl was there to write a story on their behalf.They simply proved to be the animals that muslim extremists are.And Israel recognizes the Geneva conventions. Any other lie you want to make up while poor Schalitt is brutalized by muslim animals?And you say they are kind. Why don't they release him as a token to the world that they are reasonable? Simply, they don't know how to be.
Daniel pearl was a terrorist. Israel is a bandit state that has noright to exist and violates all UN resolutions and geneva conventions.These are facts. You're just trying to antagonize me and get areaction out of me. get a life. Get a girlfriend. Too bad you're allalone on new years.
Daniel Pearl was a journalist on assignment to meet and report the position of the terrorist muslims. Instead of letting him carry propaganda back for them, they slaughtered him.
Daniel pearl was a terrorist, his parents were terrorists and hesupported terrorists. He learned the hard way. Payback is a bitch.What goes around comes around, even for the jews.
Daniel Pearl was a soft spoken reporter.
He was a dirty jew terrorist and karma is a bitch.
He only wanted to tell a story, a story that the terrorists wanted told.And his murder by those terrorists told more of the truth than the story he was planning on writing.
The truth that what goes around comes around.
Yes, and the straight of Hormuz is still open for ship traffic.The might of the iranian people is as flimsy as your cheap talk.
The Iranian people are not a threat to anybody. Your propaganda can'tchange the facts.
Oh really? Other than the people they fund like Hizbullah, Syria, and jihadists in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Hezbollah is a liberation group, syria is a threat to no one and theydon't support jihadists in Afghansitan and Iraq. US foreign policydoes. Occupation does. You stupid lying propagandist pig.
So, while you spin the people getting iranian money, you don't deny they send it.How interesting.
Iran supports Hamas and Hezbollah. So what? They trade with Syria sowhat? There's nothing wrong with Syria or Hezbollah or Hamas.Somebody has to stand up and fight the injustices that are going on inPalestine.
And Israel is doing that.
No they are not. They are the evil warmongers who are hated all overthe world and have started a war with all its neighbors!Iran is the only country besides maybe venezuela that is standing upagainst the murderous bandit state of Israel that killed americans on9/11. Israel did it.
Of course Israel is. Don't you know about that pretend country of Israel?Oh, how was traffic on the way to work this morning? Any motorcycles get close to your car?
Israel is a terrorist state that has no right to exist? I know this.
Oh, so you admit they exist. Are you going to admit Britain is real too?
Israel has no right to exist and jews are a myth.
Ah, you are still admitting they exist?
jews are a myth.
You said they exist.So, you admit you're a liar. Finally.
They don;t really exist.
Who, the imaginary Britains?
THe jews don;t really exist.
So you are a liar.
You are a liar
You can't show one time where I have been wrong.Just go ahead and make anything up, we know you're not going to tell the truth. Now it's just a matter of seeing how goofy you can be.
Of course I can. You said that there is no rape or murder in thebible, you were wrong. You said that Iran had nuclear weapons, youwere wrong. You said Israel did not have nuclear weapons you werewrong. You said that Christians value life you were wrong. You saidthat jesus existed you were wrong. You said that Iraq had WMD you werewrong. You said that Muslims killed a million in Iraq you were wrong.You said that There is no such thing as a Filipino language you werewrong. You said that Muslims did 9/11 you were wrong. You said thatjews have a DNA marker that sets them from non-jews you were wrong.You said that Copts were a race separate from the Muslims who livethere you were wrong. I know there's more I just can't think of anyright now.
It's there and it's always a bad thing done by people who were not good for doing it.
Yeah? Tell that to Herrarri,
You can't even spell. That doesn't surprise me. Red-necks andhillbillies are known to in-breed.
Am I?Or am I pretending to be?
You probably are the result of in-breeding. I wouldn't be surprised ifyou were.
Just because your family marries cousins doesn't mean mine does.
Hillbillies are known to inbreed. Not too mention since you're a dirtycrypto-jew, you believe in the already debunked story of adam and eve.Since Adam and eve were the only two people on earth and since theyhad to bone to have kids, their kids would have to have had sex witheach other. That is probably why there are so many redneck hillbilliesinbreeding because most rednecks are christian retards. It all makessense now!
And so are muslims.
Nope. Muslims don't do anything you say they do. You are just wrong onso many every levels. Every level
Yes, they do.Oh, let's check todays Al Jazeera headlines shall we?What happened today…. hmmm..http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/20111316634781484.htmlThat's right the 'pretend' muslim news outlet admits that Al Qaida exists and might have been responsible for the muslims doing the bad things in Egypt. Kind of shoots you so far out of the water you won't get a drink for days.
Al quadea is not Muslims. Muslims had nothing to do with it. Muslimsdid not do anything to anybody. Al CIAda is a CIA outfit.
Don't argue with me. You better write a letter to the editor of Al Jazeera and explain how they have it all wrong.What a moron.
They are just reporting. It has nothing to do with muslims.
It has everything to do with muslims. Read the story stupid.You are just as dumb as that moron ahcmajinhad.
They never mention muslims.
Sure they do. Something about the muslim terror group Al Qaida….You know these terror groups better than me, why do you want to ask me about it?
Yes, muslims.Facts are not your friends.Come on, can't your iranian virus filled computer do any better than that?
Muslims never did anything to anybody. Best of all, you can't prove that claim.
Of course they did. Even if you deny it thousands of times. It's still true, like that 'pretend' Egypt country.What's in today's Al Jazeera?http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/2011138561611932.htmlAn attack on a Christian woman? I bet that might have just a tidge of religious motive. Those darn friendly muslims.
You can't prove that muslims did anything. You will never prove itbecause you are wrong. Muslims never did anything to anybody. Thereare a billion muslims in the world. They did not do anything toanybody.
I gave a published account of a well documented incident.That is much more proof than you have ever offered.But I keep forgetting, you are 'keithisGreat' so you don't need to worry about reality kicking you hairy muslim chin.
There is no proof that a billion muslims were involved in anything.you stupid hick.
I never said a billion were.Did you not have enough goat love last night? Are you all cranky today?Did mr 'crankypants' get out of the wrong side of the tent today?
Yes you did. You said muslims did this and that. That is wrong becausea billion never did anything.
And I even attach links to published stories showing I'm accurate.Unlike you.But you can't deny they are nice cuddly friendly people that blow each other up and murder people like Daniel Pearl and hold Schalitt hostage against international law.
Muslims don't do that stuff. There are a billion muslims in the worldyou think they did all that stuff? They did not
Of course they do.You don't have to agree with it for it to be fact.Life does not wait for your permission to exist.Thankfully.And muslim extremists do all that stuff, and wish they could do more.
So you admit that Muslims don't do anything bad to anybody? That'sgood. I mean how can a billion people do all that stuff.
I admit of all the murder and violence in the name of religion, muslims are the worst in this day and age.And they do it because of their religion demanding it of them.
Well you're wrong. Muslims don't do anything.
They do all the time. I bet you have a hard time even typing that with a straight face.Or is your cleric standing there glaring at you?
Muslims have done nothing.
They have constantly. For the last two days I have just gone to the arabic news source Al Jazeera and pulled a story at random proving you wrong. Do you want three days in a row?http://english.aljazeera.net/video/middleeast/2011/01/201117202519458712.htmlit's not hard, as brutal as islam is.
How are your scientists doing? Any try driving to work lately?
You live in Iran not me.
And I sit watching your office. Day by day as you are driven to work with the security you think might keep you safe.
SO you admit that you are a terrorist and live in Iran. I knew it. Ihope the Iranian military grabs you and throws you in prison where youbelong. Who do you work for? Mossad? Shin bet?
Did I say that? It must have been a virus in my computer. I better go check the speed of my centrifuges in my 'medical' nuclear program. I want to start a charity and send it to all the cancer patients in Iran. You know, the ones you aren't taking care of.
Of course Irans nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Do you haveany evidence of hard proof that says otherwise.
I'm sure all the Iranian cancer patients can sleep tonight knowing all that money and effort is for them.
Of course. All the evidence and research says so. There is nothingwith Iran enriching Uranium for cancer research and nuclear fuel forthe cities.
Oh, so you aren't doing this for the sick cancer patients?I'm shocked, and you will happen to have enough for bombs too probably. How convenient.
They have a nuclear reactor that they use for cancer research andnucler energy. They do NOT have enough Uranium for a bomb. Not in theslightest. They only have LEU
Oh, so how are the cancer patients doing? How many were cured? What a relief, and to think I was worried that blood thirsty muslims would want nuclear material for weapons, what was I thinking?
Well they don't. They don't want Nuclear weapons and they don't have them.
Sure, so you are leaving all the nuclear material from thousands of defective centrifuges for cancer patients?
They have LEU For medical isotopes. I know this because I read thenews. And not lying fox news or jew controlled papers
Oh, so do the cancer patients get help or not? You are so slow and struggling here.
I don't live there. All I know is that they don't have a nuclearweapons program. Only a peaceful program
So the cancer patients are going die neglected.How sad.
Irans nuclear program is peaceful. They have a legal right to enrichuranium for peaceful purposes. They have said they want to enrichUranium for energy for their cities and Medical Isotopes to heal theirsick. I believe them because the evidence backs up their claims.
And for the few cancer patients that would take thousands of centrifuges?Oh right, try that one on the iranian opposition. I know better than to believe that.
There are probably thousands of cancer patients there are millions ofpeople in Iran. There are 70 million people in Iran. There are mostlikely thousands that have cancer. America has 300 million they havethousands as well. They use radiation to heal their sick. So doesIran.Centrifuges are used to enrich uranium. You stupid hick. They have anuclear reactor which they use to enrich medical isotopes for theirsick.
And how many of them have been able to use nuclear material coming from thousands of defective centrifuges?
I don't know. I know that it is peaceful and that they are inaccordance with the IAEA and the NPT
Then you lie.
I don't lie. You lie when you say that the bible is history and thatfilipino is not the official language of the philippines and that thecoptic egyptians were around at the dawn of civilization.
The Bible account has been accurate on all historical digs that try to refute it.And there is still a foundation in the province of Babel.
Wrong. The bible is false. Everything about it has been debunked.Everything. There are no Israelites, there were no edmoites, snakesdon't talk. There was no great flood etc. There was no christ, therewas no moses, or anything. History has no findings of anything in thebible. even jews admit that it is a farce. Name one thing that it isaccurate in?
But all those things were real.Even if you don't like it.
It's all myth. It's all jewish mythology. All of those things are fakeand you know it you are just a troll
But all those things were real.And I know you know it. That's why you get so upset when I say so.You just hate being wrong.
You are a troll. Everything in the bible is fake-myth-nonsense. Youknow it, I know it, most of the world knows it. The funny thing aboutall this stuff is the one group of people who have NOT realized thatall of the bible is bullshit is are the people you hate. The Muslims.They are the ones that think the earth is flat and that the earth isthe center of the universe and that god created the world in sevendays, and that Israelites are gods chosen people and that the earth is5,000 years old. Which makes sense when you think that most peoplethat believe this live in sand and play with Camels.
Tagalog is one of the two official languages, the other is English.Are you a sufferer of Turrets Syndrome?
Your site proves NOTHING! There were concentration camps in Americaand japan too. There were no gas chambers, six million didn't die, thejews are liars.
Yes it does.They did die, and you deny it because you just don't value life. It's a muslim thing, I understand.
It proves that germany had concentration camps. So did america.It's a muslim thing. You're a muslim and you don't value life. Shameon you you dirty muslim.
And the place where 6 million Jews faced the shoah.
America killed 6 million jews and they faced the shoah.
Nazi Germany did, in the death camps and very carefully documented.Eisonhower took photos so people like you could never deny it happened.And even if you deny it, the Jews are still in their ancestral homeland.
The jews never had an ancestral homeland. They have always beenwandering and dispersed and blood sucking parasites. Always have beenand always will be.The germans did not kill 6 million jews. The Americans did. And isvery carefully documented. The germans were so meticulous with theirrecords yet nowhere can anybody find a single file describing the gaschambers or a final solution because there wasn't one.The jews took the land from the Arabs who were there first.
Yes, the jews did. The western wall proves it.So it sucks to be you, and to be taught lies and perversions of history.
Nope. The western wall proves nothing. The Canaanites and thePalestinians were there first.
The palestinians were there from the 7th century muslim invasion.The canaanites were not around after the assyrian invasion that took the norther 10 tribes of Israel. That kind of proves you wrong, now doesn't it?
The Palestinians were there thousands of years before the jews were there.The Canaanites ARE the Palestinians and were there BEFORE the biblewas written.
No, actually they weren't.How sad, make up something new for a change, these tired old lies are tired and old.
Actually they were. They are the descendants of the Canaanite peoplewho existed thousands of years before the bible was written.
No, they aren't. They are from the arabic invaders, that took over the Byzantine empire.
They are the Descendants of the Canaanite people because Arabs aredescendants of the Canaanite people.
You have said Canaan didn't exist, that the flood didn't happen and it was just a region.You slipped and admitted I was right all along.
Canaan is a country. Canaan was never a person. Canaanites are notdescendants of one dirty jew. Canaanites are semitic people who arearabs. The palestinians are descendants of the Canaanites. Canaanprecedes the bible and its people precede the bible by thousands ofyears.
Yes, canaan was a person. They named the area and his descendants after him.
Canaanites were Semitic people that precede the stupid bible bythousands of years. Canaanites and Canaan have NOTHING to do with thestupid retarded fake lying bible. In the bible Canaan was a jew sothat would mean all Canaanites would be jews that is wrong. You arewrong. Canaanites are Semites. They are Arabs. Palestinians are arabs.Palestinians are descendants of the Canaanite people who existedbefore the bible even existed.
Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan in the territory he lived in.It's really so simple Why do stupid muslim persian iranians have to twist everything around?
The Canaanite people were there THOUSANDS of years before the biblewas concocted. The Canaanites are semtic peoples that lived thousandsof years before the “Israelites”. The Canaanite people are not jews.They are semitic arab. The Palestinians are descendants of theCanaanites. You're wrong on all accounts. The bible came AFTER theCanaanites were already there.
Canaanites were the descendants of Canaan. The territory he lived in was named after him.
That's impossible because the Canaanite people existed THOUSANDS ofyears before the bible.
History is what it is.So what, if the Bible is right it doesn't matter when it was written.
History is what it is. jewish romanticism is not history. The bible iswrong and flawed. The evidence is overwhelming. History proves youwrong. Canaan existed thousands of years before the bible was written.So the Canaanites are Semitic and are not jews.
And muslim terrorism is part of history, just as the real evidence showing jews built the temple mount and retaining walls.That they were there when the muslim invaders showed up in the 7th century.
The semitic arabs were there THOUSANDS of years before the jews builttheir stupid wall. They occupied land that isn't theirs. just liketoday
That was not palestinian arabs, that was philistines killed off and assimilated by Assyria.
Palestinian arabs are semites who have been in that region forthousands of years.
After they invaded from the arabic desert.
Nope. Arabs are Semites that have lived THOUSANDS of years before the bible.
So, that doesn't mean a thing. The Bible explains origins in the area. Like persians and babylonians and the other has been failed empires.
It means that arabs and semites precede the fake bible by thousands of years.
So what? It just means that the Bible understood history and laid it out for us.
It means that the bible is WRONG! I have proven that it is wrong.Arabs and semites precede the wrong bible by thousands of years.
it means you didn't think through your comment.
The bible has nothing to do with history or archaeology. The world is4.6 billion years old not 5,000 years old like the bible says.
The Bible laid out the history. Sounds pretty simple to everyone but you.
The bible is wrong. The bible doesn't mention dinosaurs or the earthbeing 4.6 billion years. History does. The bible is evil and wrong andstupid.
The Bible know more in one page than you have known all your life.The clerics may have tried, but they are limited by your short comings.
They know how to lie. They lie and say the earth is 5,000 years oldwhen it is billions of years old.
Is it? That's your word against all logic.
Yes it is. The world is billions of years old. Not five thousand likethe bible lies about.
And how do you know, you weren't there.
I know it's false because the evidence shows that the earth is 4.6billion years old not 5 thousand like the bible falsely claims.
Of 6,000 years ago God created a world 4.6 billion years old.
That makes no sense at all. the bible is wrong because it says theearth is only 5,000 years old when it really is 4.6 billion years old.Their god is wrong. The bible is wrong. Your religion and your stupiddeath cult is wrong.You are wrong.There is no god you can't prove that there is one so you have noevidence to back your claim. We have been down this path alreadybefore I tried teaching it to you but you were not interested inlearning or having a serious discussion you were just interested introlling.
The God of Israel is strong enough to not only create the earth, but create the earth at any age.He's not anything like that weak and mean allah.
You are just a troll.
Why thank you. That's so much better than what you are.
And Caliph Omar never said that all necessary information was in the koran?I'm so confused, you aren't saying Caliph Omar was wrong?
You are confused. You are a stupid troll.
I'm not confused. Why do you think I'm confused, are you confused?
You are a stupid troll. You have made this obviously clear.
Oh, I am? Why, because your allah isn't as strong as the God of the small tiny little Israel?
You started out as an effective troll but you are slipping.
And you have proven nothing.So, have you been able to recruit any more foreigners for your nuclear program?http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=200675You never have said how all the cancer patients are doing. Remember the nuclear program was to provide cancer treatments?And allah still hasn't been strong enough to conquer the Almighty of that tiny Israel.
Not good enough troll.
Not good enough in what way?
You have not.You are not honest like I am. You don't know the truth because thereis no truth in you. You are a liar
Yes I have.And you just can't stand that, can you?http://www.omniglot.com/writing/coptic.htm
What does that prove? That does not prove that the Copts are differentfrom the muslims ethnically or Racially. The muslims who live in egyptare Arab/semitic. So are the Christians that live side by side.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dxkw9b1_KGw&feature=related
Yes it does. It explains even their language goes back to the greek beginnings of Alexander the Great. Way before Christianity or the invading muslim arabs.You lose. You're dumb, your probably ugly and I'd think you have bad teeth too, but I don't need to go that far.
The arabs are semitic and they are egyptians. Egyptians are arab. Theyhave always been Arab/semitic.
No they are not.http://www.omniglot.com/writing/coptic.htmYou can keep saying it, and you will keep being wrong.
The arabs are semitic and the copts are arabs and semitic the muslimshave a right to be there because they are descendants of the Ancientegyptians.
Still making things up.Do you still eat playdo?
The muslims in egypt are still Arab and Semitic which means theirgenes can be traced to ancient egypt. The Semitic peoples lived in themiddle east for thousands of years. The muslims in Egypt are semiticso they are living in their land that they have inhabited for years.
Only half egyptian the other half is Jewish.
Wrong. Arab/semitic is all of egypt. It has always been inhabited byArab/semites. You stupid hick. There is no such thing as “jewish”. Youstupid idiot. There is no such thing as a jew. Golda meir said thereis no such thing as a palestinian So I have it on good authority thatthere is no such thing as a jew. In antiquity there is no proof of ajewish race, or jewish people or jewish anything. They have records ofhebrews but they are a semitic people that died off years ago.
No, you are wrong.And it doesn't matter how often you repeat a lie, since you aren't Joseph Goebbels it won't work for you.
You have no proof of ANYTHING you say.
I have used proof on every single point. Since you keep wandering around and I only use them a couple of times you probably just forgot and can't remember anything before todays message at the mosque. Oh, you don't go to mosque every day, do you?Camels don't want to waste their spit on you, but I'm still laughing.
That is not proof of anything
There is, but I'm not sure how much you can ignore at one time.http://www.omniglot.com/writing/coptic.htm
That is not proof of anything. That does not prove that Christian is a race.
I never said Christianity was a race.You think so, and then say I'm wrong.I said Coptic Egyptians are the ethnic group, and that Christianity is just the church they attend.This is too much for you, isn't it?
Coptic means christian so you are lying and are wrong
No, Coptic means of Egyptian descent from the dawn of antiquity when the cave dwellers in persia were using clubs for food.
No it doesn't. Coptic means christian. Christianity is not the oldestreligion in the world. It's one of the most modern.
No, it does not. Coptic is Egyptian, and their alphabet is based on the greek that Alexander the Great brought them way before Christianity. That whole timing thing just tosses you on your back side.
I didn't mistake anything. You either sent the wrong link or you're just a moron and can't remember what you sent.The men who killed our contractors, dragged their burnt bodies through the streets then hung them on a bridge were our enemies. And I am glad if they were killed by our soldiers.Any american should know they will be considered terrorism for a number of reasons, the main one the heavy cost that terrorism will place on them when we retaliate.That's not evil to defend ourselves.And the God of Abraham is not evil any more than light equals darkness. I have clarity of thought, something you lack. How is that your backwoods cleric failed educating you at the local madrassa?The Almighty is the protector of widows and orphans, something allah doesn't claim. That's enough of a difference for me. I want a God who wants us to prosper and thrive. Not suffer under forced submission.I proved you were wrong, on every single point. Even when you pretended to know what the Bible said.
“I didn't mistake anything. You either sent the wrong link or you're just a moron and can't remember what you sent.”You are mistaken. You dont know the difference between a french accentand a filipino accent. You are wrong. Pablo mercado and bobby fischer,the guy with the “black” hair are not french. At all. And you can'ttell the difference between the two and you prove it every time yourespond with the same asinine response.” The men who killed our contractors, dragged their burnt bodies through thestreets then hung them on a bridge were our enemies. And I am glad if they were killed by our soldiers.”They did that AFTER you killed and starved their children. It's calledrevenge. Simple, old-fashioned revenge.”The Almighty is the protector of widows and orphans”Not your god. Your god is jehova, the devil. he kills innocentchildren in Palestine and makes slaves and graves out of everyone andeverything. “I want a God who wants us to> prosper and thrive. Not suffer under forced submission. “God is in your head.
I am not mistaken.Keith, how often did cousins marry in your bloodline?
You are clearly mistaken. Every time you respond you clearly show thatyou do not know the difference between a french accent and a filipinoone.
No, I am not.You are clearly stubborn about things you weren't smart enough to do right.
I know you don't know the difference between a french accent and atagalog accent. You don't even know the difference between an AMERICANaccent and a French accent.You are trying to twist it around on me. It's not gonna work. Ialready linked you the videos. They are of ONE interview. Nobody isfrench. Bobby Fischer is American. Pablo Mercado is Filipino.
Of course I do.Loser, go kiss your goat, it sounds like you need some loving.
Obviously you don't. You called a tagalog accent a french accent you dolt.
I know what I know And I know what that first link sounded like a white guy with black hair talking with a distinct french accent.
“I know what I know And I know what that first link sounded like a white guy with black hair talking with a distinct french accent.”Bobby Fischer is an American with an American accent. The guy who yougot confused with was Pablo Mercado, a Filipino man with a Tagalogaccent.You don't know the difference between a Tagalog accent and a Frenchaccent and an American accent with a french accent. Why are youcalling Bobby Fischer a Frenchman?Did you even LISTEN to the Links I gave you?
Then you linked to the wrong person.
A Tagalog accent does not sound like a French accent. How did you geta Tagalog accent mixed up with a French accent? Haven't you ever heardFrench before?
I didn't. You screwed up on the link.French is totally different. I don't know what Tagalog sounds like, but I do know what french sounds like.
“I don't know what Tagalog sounds like”You know what a Tagalog accent sounds like thanks to me. I sent youtwo links of one interview with a guy named Pablo Mercado speakingwith one. I don't where the fuck you got french from.”French is totally different.”It's the language of France. Just like Tagalog is the Language of thePhilippines.” but I do know what french sounds like. “if that's true then why did you call a Filipino accent a french one?
I don't care what tagalog sounds like. I recognize a french accent, and that's all I ever claimed to do.You are such a retard.
“I don't care what tagalog sounds like.”A Tagalog accent, not Tagalog itself. A Tagalog accent is what PabloMercado had in the Links I sent you.”I recognize a french accent, and that's all I ever claimed to do.”If you do then why did you call a Tagalog accent a french accent?
He isn't the person in the video you linked to.You are so retarded you can't understand 75 times in a row that the man you linked to was a white guy with black hair and a french accent.
I linked to a Filipino man speaking with a Filipino accent. Youassumed that whoever was speaking had black hair and was white and hada french accent. You were wrong and after I proved you wrong you areacting like a little child and not admitting your mistakes. Thatdoesn't sound very christian to me. But like most Christians, you justmake up what a christian is based on, on whatever you sounds good offeels good at the moment.
Fine, you never ever make a mistake. It must have been Youtube that switched that to another link of a white guy with black hair speaking with a french accent.And you haven't proven me wrong on anything. Are you going to keep pretending you have?
There IS no white guy with black hair speaking with a french accent.That is what you were wrong about. There is no french accent. What youheard was a Filipino accent.
Then it's not the guy you sent a link to.Boy, I thought even you would figure that out. I guess you're not dumb than I realized.
You were wrong. That is why you keep making mistakes. You were wrongthinking there was a french accent. That is why you were wrong and youcontinue to be wrong.There is no french accent, there is no white guy with black hair,period. You are wrong right there. From the very beginning you arewrong.
The first time you sent a link was to a white guy, black hair and a french accent.You don't like it, then be more careful with the links you send.
There never was a french accent/ I sent you both links later.
The first one was.
No there wasn't you were mistaken. You don't know what a french accentsounds like obviously.
I know, and I know what you link opened up to. Just because you were careless and it went to a video you didn't intend doesn't mean you should try to blame everyone else for it.
I know exactly what I sent an idiot like you.
Then why do you keep giving me a hard time about your mistake.
You made the mistake. You mistook a Tagalog accent for a french one.That is YOUR mistake.
No, I was not wrong.
You called a Filipino accent a french one. You were wrong.
I called a french accent a french accent. You are the one that keeps insisting I saw a video I didn't.
There was no french accent. That's what you were wrong about. That'swhere you make your first mistake. You're wrong right from thebeginning.
Yes, there was. At least in the video you linked to that first time,I hear your Iranian nuclear scientists aren't feeling very well…. how is that going?
“Yes, there was. At least in the video you linked to that first time”This is proof that you don't know what a french accent is.
It's proof you don't know what links you used. I know a french accent.
You don't know a french accent. That is why when I sent you a link ofa Filipino man speaking with a Filipino accent, you mistook it for afrench accent. You're on crack. That's why you thought a Filipinoaccent was a french accent.
Yes, actually I do. I grew up around a french accent.
No you did not. You can't even tell the difference from a Tagalogaccent and a French one.You think a Filipino accent is a French accent. Enough said.
Yes, I did.Oh, you are so cranky. Time for more goat porn? http://www.hotiraniangoatsex.net
Then why did you mistake a Filipino accent for a French one?
How does it feel to know the persian culture is lost?Did you know hizbullah is claiming to have destroyed it?http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/me_iran1136_11_17.asp
Islam destroyed the Persian culture. Arab Renegades changed thepersian culture. Just like Christianity changed the Native AmericansCulture and the African and aborigines cultures. And the Natives ofthe Polynesian Islands and south America.
So you no longer claim that the persian empire deserves to be 'reborn' under it's current leadership?
Ask a Historian.
I don't need to. I understand history and the lessons it could teach you.You go ask your cleric. He'll probably even overlook the goat.
“I don't need to. I understand history and the lessons it could teach you.”Then why didn't you know that the Filipinos had their own languagecalled Tagalog? Why did you think that Spanish was the main languageof the Philippines?
A long time ago I dealt with family from General Ramos. She educated me on the political structure in the Philipines. This was just after the Ramos overthrow, Emelda was still an issue and and this family member was sent to the US where is was a little more stable at the time. Spain owned the islands, and spanish was the language of the colonial government. Some of the old families use it as a matter of pride, local dialects are so 'native'. When America beat spain and we took control and gave independence to the islands the official language shifted to English of course. But Spanish still has it's place. Some tagalog is common in some places, but there are hundreds of local dialects.But all that is pointless, I am aware to some degree of all that, but the first link that opened was a white guy with black hair speaking with a french accent.
Well then there is no excuse for not knowing that the officialnational language of the philippines is filipino AKA Tagalog. Youshould have known that since you have experienced all the things youhave. Supposedly. You should know that that was a Tagalog accent andnot a french accent. You should have known that.You need to pay attention the next time someone tries to tell you something.
I know a french accent when I hear it. And frankly you are such a horrible liar I don't believe you on what they speak in the Felipines. Give a link proving it.
“I know a french accent when I hear it.”If you did you would know that what was heard on the links I providedwas Filipino AKA Tagalog.”Give a link proving it”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagalog#Official_status
I know the first time you sent a link it was to a white guy with black hair and a french accent.I know what I saw, and I can keep saying it. But it will always be what I saw, facts are like that. They don't change because some iranian muslim keeps harping away like a cranky old wife that hasn't been beat enough.
You were wrong. I never sent you a link with a man with a frenchaccent. You were mistaken. You don't know the difference between afrench accent and a Tagalog accent.
You sent a link to someone you don't know about, and now want to blame me.You were wrong, if you think that white guy with black hair and a french accent was the one you think it was.
I sent a link of two people who were not from france, did not havefrench accents and were not frenchmen. You were mistaken.
No, I'm not.
Clearly you are. There was a tagalog accent not a french accent.
No, I am not. You are careless and don't always link correctly.
You know you were wrong. There was a Filipino accent. You even saidthat there was no such thing as one. You were wrong.
No, I know I'm not wrong.
You were wrong. You thought a Tagalog accent was a french accent andyou also thought that there was no such thing as a Filipino language.You were wrong on both accounts. Filipino is the main officiallanguage of the Philippines.
No, I wasn't.
If you weren't wrong then why did you say a Tagalog accent was afrench one and then adamantly claim falsely that it is a French accenteven though all evidence points to it being a Filipino Accent?
I was not wrong, the first link you sent was to a white guy with black hair speaking in a french accent.
No it wasn't . That is why you are wrong from the very beginning. Youstart with a false claim and so you end up being false.There was no french accent. That is where you made your first mistake.You mistook a Tagalog accent, for a French one. You mistook a FIlipinoMan for a white man with Black hair. You mistook an American man withbrown hair for a man with black hair.You were dead wrong dead wrong dead wrong. But I expect you to just bea child and reply with the same childish mentality and attitudebecause you have no friends and are lonely and just want somebody totalk to.
Yes, you were wrong.
I didn't. I said a french accent was a french accent.You keep thinking the video I saw is the one you wanted me to see. You must have linked them wrong.How are all your nuclear scientists doing? I hear they don't drive very well around motorcycles.
How come you don't know the difference between a Tagalog accent and aFrench accent? Why do you call a Filipino accent a French accent.
I know a french accent when I hear it.Do you know a link to a tagalog accent? Then you might want to use it.
“I know a french accent when I hear it.”Obviously you don't.You couldn't even tell the difference from a Filipino accent and a French one.”Do you know a link to a tagalog accent? Then you might want to use it.”I did. Twice.
Clearly I do. And you don't. You don't even realize when you waste time sending the wrong link.
Then why did you call a Filipino accent a french one? I never sent youa french accent. Ever.
When you sent me a link with a white guy with black hair speaking with a french accent.
I never sent you a link with a white guy with black hair speaking witha french accent. That's where you're wrong.There was no french accent. You mistook a Filipino accent for a French accent.
Tagalog is one of two official languages.http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/tagalog_mainpage.htmEnglish is the other.
Tagalog AKA Filipino is THE language of the Philippines. It's alanguage. Filipino is a language. You were wrong.
One of two, the other being english.And Spanish was the official language for almost 300 years, until 1973.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_language_in_the_PhilippinesPeople that are really quality old families don't speak tagalog. The new money might, and the working class might, but any expert with high standing or academic achievement wouldn't brag about his tagalog accent.
You said there was no such thing as a filipino language. You werewrong. FIlipino AKA Tagalog is the official language of thePhilippines. Filipino is there language just like english is ours inAmerica. There are many spanish speaking people in America but ourlanguage is English. You were wrong.Tagalog is the official main language spoken in the Philippines. Youwere wrong.
And I have given you links that explain that Tagalog is the language of the main islam, where the capital is located. But it is not the language of all the islands.There is no 'fillipino' language of all the people.
“And I have given you links that explain that Tagalog is the language of the main islam”WHAT?!?!? Filipino is the language of the Philippines like french isthe language of the french.
No, actually once more you prove your ignorance.Tagalog is the dialect on the main island of the capital, and is one of the two official languages. Until 1973 Spanish was the official language, for more than 200 years. The natives of each area have their own dialects which vary from island to island.The more you talk the more you show your ignorance on this. And the more what ever source you use there looks flaky.But why did you sent that first link of the white guy/black hair that spoke with a strong french accent?
Tagalog is the language of the Philippines. It has been since the30's. Tagalog is the main official language of the Philippines. It isspoken by the poor, the rich, the educated and by those in government.Just like english is here in America. You are wrong. Spanish is notthe official language of the Philippines.
No, the spanish language was the predominant language used over the hundreds of islands that make up the philipines. At least until the end of the spanish american war. Then it was english.Tagalog is only used on the island of Luzon where the capital is.You are just clueless.
“There is no 'fillipino' language of all the people. “Yes it is. It's called “Filipino”.
There are two languages used in government in the Filipino Islands. Tagalog and English.There is no 'Filipino' language as such.
There is a filipino language. It's called Filipino. Tagalog is alsocalled Filipino. you're wrong.You said that spanish was the language used by government. Are yougonna admit that you were wrong now?
You have been calling it Tagalog all along.So, now you're going back to this imagined language all philipino's use? Other than the educated and old families that use spanish or English?
Filipino is interchangeable with Tagalog. It's the same thing. Thegovernment officials, the poor, the educated the rich all speakFilipino AKA Tagalog. You said there was no such thing as a Filipinolanguage. You were proven wrong.Filipino, also Pilipino, is a prestige register of the Tagaloglanguage and the name under which Tagalog is designated the nationallanguage and one of two official languages of the Philippines.Filipino/Tagalog is the first language of a third of the population ofthe Philippines. It is centered around Manila but is known almostuniversally throughout the country.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino_language
You call it tagalog. The filpino's call it Tagalog. It's Tagalog. And English is just as much one of the official languages as it is.It's a local dialect used on the island of the capital. Thats all. You are so wrong, so many times. It must be hard for you.
Filipino is the language of the Philippines. It is known allthroughout the country. You said spanish was the main language AND yousaid there is no such thing as a Filipino language. You said theydidn't have a language. You were wrong. Filipino/Tagalog is thelanguage they speak.
You are such a loser. There is a dialect 'tagalog' used on the largest island used as one of the two official languages. The other is English.
Tagalog is known all throughout the Islands. It is the officialnational language of the Philippines.
It's the dialect spoken on the largest island according to your own sources.
It is the National Language of the whole country. Not spanish. You were wrong.
Spanish was for over 200 years, as I stated. And English still is one of the two as your sources admitted.
Nope. Filipino has ALWAYS been their national language. NATIONAL.Meaning all over.
Oh, you are such a retard. For over 200 years it was Spanish, until we 'installed' English as the official language. And English is still one of the official languages there to this day, according to your sources.
English is not known as much as Filipino. English is used just likethe dollar is used. It's good for business.
There are thousands of dialects known as filipino. Tagalog is the major one, the one used on the biggest island with the capital.
Filipino is the language of the Philippines which proves you wrong.You said there was no Filipino language. You are wrong.
Tagalog is one of the languages used in the Philippines, there is no language called 'Filipino'. There is talalog a dialect used on the largest island used as one of two official languages.You are so lame, what cleric is telling you all this garbage? Can't you even read your own sources? Or they don't make it in Farsi?
” Tagalog is one of the languages used in the Philippines, there is no language called 'Filipino'. “You are wrong. There is a national language of the Philippines calledFilipino. It is the national language of the Country and is spoken inall regions of the Philippines and is called Filipino. Not spanishlike you falsely claim.
The two languages used in government official documents is the local dialect Tagalog and English.Tagalog, the name of that dialect. This is confusing for you. How are your iranian scientists doing?
The national language of the Philippines is Filipino. You are wrong.Filipino is spoken ALL over the Philippines. Not spanish. They havetheir own language you are wrong.
It's two languages, tagalog and English.Being stupid over and over won't make you any more correct.
Filipino is the National Language of the Philippines. It is spoken allover the nation.
See, it is one of the dialects.You are wrong, even using your own sources.
There is no 'one language' called filipino. They use the dialect from the largest island, the one with the capital 'tagalog' as one of their official languages. I've been saying that from the beginning.How do you think you know so much about the filipines? Are you involved with the muslim insurgents in the south?
1. Tagalog is widely spoken and is the language most understood inall the Regions of the Philippines;You hear that? The most understood in ALL the regions.
1. Tagalog is the language when they eat too many beans and fart in all parts of the islands.You hear that? The most farted!Your own sources said it was the dialect from the largest island, used as one of the two official languages along with English.Go back and read your own sources. You're wrong, you aren't watching the same video you sent me that first time. The one with the white guy with black hair speaking with a french accent.And even the later link had a French title on the top.
“Your own sources said it was the dialect from the largest island”Wrong. It says that it is the most understood language in all of thePhilippines and is the official national language.”used as one of the two official languages along with English.Go back and read your own sources.”Filipino is the Official language of the Philippines. You said it wasspanish and that they don't have their own language. You are wrong.”You're wrong, you aren't watching the same video you sent me thatfirst time. The one with the white guy with black hair speaking with afrench accent.And even the later link had a French title on the top. “There was no french accent. You mistook a Tagalog accent for a frenchaccent. You know this as do I.
It is the dialect from the largest island and with the capital. So of course it would be the main 'dialect'.Hello, are you blonde?
Filipino is the NATIONAL language of the Philippines. You are wrong.You said there is no Filipino language. You said spanish was the mainlanguage.
You are such a big goof. Why all the hostility today? Were you supposed to guard those nuclear scientists as they drive to work?
I'm just showing how wrong you were saying the Philippines does nothave Filipino as their national language and that you don't know thedifference between a Filipino accent and a french accent.
They have two official languages, the dialect called tagalog and English.You should read your own sources.So, are you cranky because you have to protect iranian nuclear scientists?
They have one national language. Filipino. Filipino is spoken all overthe islands.
No, they have two national languages. One is english, the other is the dialect spoken at the capital.
The national language of the Philippines is Filipino.
No, on mars.
That's where you're from. Thinking that a Filipino accent is a frenchaccent and saying there is no such thing as a Filipino language.You're from the planet wrong.
No, I know what I know, and you can't say things enough to convince me of an untruth. I didn't grow up with a cleric and a forced religion.Did the centrifuges get repaired yet?
You know very little. You show that all the time. Foe example youthought a filipino man and an American man were french men. You alsothough Spanish was the main language in the Philippines and that thereis no language in the Philippines called Filipino. You were wrong.
I know you think you sent me a link that was the right one. And I know it wasn't.And you are too stupid to figure that out.
I know that you are lying and were mistaken. You know this as well.
I know you're an idiot having a really bad month, well…. couple of years.The reactors aren't up. You barely have your computers working the centrifuges are damaged and now you must find your own uranium due to UN sanctions.What a moron. No wonder you're cranky.
At least I know that Filipino is the national language of thePhilippines and I know the difference between a French man and aFilipino man.
It is one of two languages, the other being English.And it's the dialect of the largest island, the island with the capital.I was not incorrect, you are just to muslim to admit you're wrong.
Filipino is the language of the Philippines. You said there was none.You were wrong. You are wrong.
Tagalog is the dialect used on the largest island. According to your own sources that is.
Tagalog is spoken all throughout the Philippines.
It's spoken on the island with the capital, according to your own sources.
Filipino is spoken all over the Philippines. Not just near the capital.
As a dialect, which the islands have hundreds, it's the main one. It's even one of the two official languages, the other being English.According to your own sources.So, have a chance to look at that goat porn and wind down a little? http://www.muslimanimalsexiniran.xxx
Filipino is the national language of the Philippines. You were wrong.You said there was no such thing as a Filipino Language.The islands of the Philippines all read and write and speak andunderstand Filipino. Not spanish, not english, Filipino. The languageis real, it exists and you're wrong!
No, and if you say it another 10,000 times all you'll have is one worn out virus laden iranian computer.
You said that there is no such thing as a Filipino language. You arewrong. They have a national language, a national language whereFilipino is spoken not just on one island but ALL the islands.
There isn't. So, they use a dialect from the island holding the capital. And it's not called filipino, it's tagalog.
Yes there is. It's called Filipino. It's spoken all over the islands.
Tagalog and English.A lot of spanish in the upper crust old families.
Filipino is the national language of the Philippines.the 1973 Constitution provided for a separate national language toreplace Pilipino, a language which it named Filipino. The pertinentarticle, though, Article XV, Section 3(2), mentions neither Tagalognor Pilipino as the basis for Filipino, instead calling on theNational Assembly to:take steps toward the development and formal adoption of a commonnational language to be known as Filipino.
No, there are two national languages, tagalog a dialect from the island with the capital luzon, and English. According to the sources you provided for me.
Tagalog is Filipino. Filipino/tagalog is the national language notSpanish. You are wrong. The capital of the Philippines is Manila. Youare wrong.
No, tagalog is the dialect of the island with the capital, and one of the official languages, the other is English. Your own sources said so. So, don't argue with me, argue with them.
Filipino is Tagalog. Filipino is a language. You are wrong.
No, tagalog is a dialect, spoken on the main island along with the other official language, English.You are not just wrong, but stubborn as well.
Filipino is spoken all over the Philippines. You are wrong. You saidthey had no national language. They do. It's called Filipino.
No, different dialects are spoken all over the islands. The official languages are tagalog and English, tagalog is the dialect from the largest island with the capital. You did read your own sources, didn't you?So, was the drive to work all right, or did any motorcycles scare you?
Filipino/tagalog is not just spoken in Manila. It wouldn't be calledthe NATIONAL language if that was the case.
It's called one of the two 'official languages'. The other of course is english.And it's not Filipino/Tagalog, it's 'tagalog'.
Filipino is the national language of the Philippines. You were wrong.You said it was Spanish. Filipino is spoken all over not just inManila.
Tagalog & English.
Filipino is the language of the Philippines. You were wrong. You saidthere was no such thing as a Filipino language. You said spanish wasthe main language. You need to admit you were wrong.
There is no 'filipino'. There is tagalog, a dialect from the largest island. And it's one of the two official languages, the other is English.You are wrong, even if you lie about it.Oh. Spanish 'was' the main official language for over 200 years. You notice even you said “was”?
There is Filipino. You are wrong. Filipino is the national language ofthe Philippines.Filipino, is a prestige register of the Tagalog language and the nameunder which Tagalog is designated the national language and one of twoofficial languages of the Philippines.The other yardstick for distinguishing a language from a dialect is:different grammar, different language. “Filipino”, “Pilipino” and”Tagalog” share identical grammar. They have the same determiners(ang, ng and sa); the same personal pronouns (siya, ako, niya, kanila,etc.); the same demonstrative pronouns (ito, iyan, doon, etc.); thesame linkers (na, at and ay); the same particles (na and pa); and thesame verbal affixes -in, -an, i- and -um-. In short, same grammar,same language.You said there was no Filipino language. You were wrong. They alwaysspoke Filipino even 200 years ago.
Tagalog is a dialect from the largest island, with the capital. It is also one of the two national languages, the other in English.There are hundreds of dialects.
All under the language of Filipino. You were wrong. You said everybodyspoke spanish.
I said that the older established families spoke spanish, that it had been the official language for a long time (more than 200 years).And the two official languages are english and Tagalog the dialect from the largest island.
No you didn't you said that everybody spoke spanish and the Filipinoshad no language.You were proven wrong by me.Filipino is the same as Tagalog.
Tagalog is a dialect. A major one sure, but still a dialect.
You are still wrong. Filipino is the national language of thePhilippines. You don't even know how to spell Philippines.
Tagalog is the dialect from the largest island and is the official language with English as the second.There is a difference between 'national' and 'official'.
The national and official language of the Philippines is Filipino.
The 'official' (not national) languages of the Phillippines is English and Tagalog, the dialect from the largest island.
The official AND the national language of the Philippines (which youcan't spell) is Filipino.
The 'official languages' of the philippines is tagalog a dialect and english.This is too much for you to follow. Why don't you go to that story about north korea and defend your source for rogue nuclear technology some more?
Filipino is the official and national language of the Philippines.That is too much for you to follow. You are still wrong like always.
Tagalof is a dialect, from the largest island in the country. It is also one of the two 'official' languages, the other of course is English.Are you just jealous because the iranian persians don't have farsi spoken around the world?Is that what all this is about?
There is no such thing as Tagalof. There is tagalog. Which it'sstandard form is called Filipino, the national and official languageof the Philippines. Not spanish like you said. And they do have alanguage called Filipino. It's the language of the Philippines.
There is a dialect called Tagalog. And it's not even the only official language. The other is English.And Spanish was the official language for over 200 years.Did you even read your own sources?
Tagalog is not a dialect. Its standardized form is called Filipino andis the national and official language of the Philippines.”And Spanish was the official language for over 200 years.”No it wasn't.
Tagalog is a dialect. You really have a problem with that don't you?
Tagalog is not a Dialect. It is a language which in its standardizedform is the official and national language of the Phlippines. You arewrong like always.
Tagalog is a dialect, from the largest island with the capital. And even it's not the only official language! The other is English.Don't you read your own sources? Or, are you too busy repairing computers and centrifuges?
Filipino is the national language of the Philippines. You are wrong.
Read your own sources. They have two official languages, english and the dialect from the largest island where the capital is, Tagalog.
How can a dialect from one area of a vast country be their Officiallanguage? It's not. Filipino is.
They can do what ever they like, like having English as one of their official languages.Of course we both know tagalog, the dialect from the largest island is the other.
Filipino is the national language of the Philippines. If you deny thislike a stupid idiot then tell me what Filipino is?Filipino is the official language of the Philippines. It is thenational language of the Philippines. It is in their constitution.
No, actually they have two official languages. One is English and the other is the local dialect Tagalog.Are we having a bad year? Cutting funding to Hizbullah 40%, explosions near the pakistani border killing 39 good muslims at a mosque… boy Iran is still the third world backwater isn't it?
That's like saying valley girls is the official language of America.You're wrong. Filipino is the national official language of thePhilippines. If it isn't then what is Filipino pray tell?
No, it's actually saying that Tagalog is the dialect from the largest island and has the capital. The other official language is English.See how that works? Since I stick to facts I don't have to waffle and get stubborn enough to argue over something your sources explained and you just won't get.Wow, are all persian muslims as stupid as you? No wonder the centrifuges went bad.
What is Filipino?
It is a nationality.
And what else?Let me help you.You don't want to tell the truth because it will prove you wrong.Filipino may refer to:* From or related to the Philippines (Philippine may be used alsoas a qualifier or adjective in certain instances, though Filipino ismore appropriate for casual usage). * A person of pure Spanish descent born in the Philippines. It isalso called Insulares (“from the islands”) or Criollos(Creoles). o Culture of the Philippines, cultural description in article format. o Philippine cuisine, snack of the culture. o Filipino language, the national language of thePhilippines based primarily on Tagalog language. o Filipino Sign Language, which is also known as PhilippineSign Language. o Filipino martial arts o Filipino people, a citizen or native of the Philippines. o Filipina can also be used to denote a female Filipino. o Filipinos (snack food), branded cookies manufactured byKraft Foods and United Biscuits in Spain and Holland.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FilipinoFilipino is a language you are wrong.
And none of shows I was wrong.And I notice you didn't give a source, because you probably made it up.And Tagalog and English are the official languages of the island nations. Tagalog, the dialect from the largest island.http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/tagalog_mainpage.htm
You said there was no such thing as Filipino as a language. You arewrong for saying that. Admit that there is a language called Filipinoand I wont bring it up again.Now you're lying and said I didn't give a source. What a dirty liar you are!> Filipino may refer to:>> * From or related to the Philippines (Philippine may be used also> as a qualifier or adjective in certain instances, though Filipino is> more appropriate for casual usage).> * A person of pure Spanish descent born in the Philippines. It is> also called Insulares (\”from the islands\”) or Criollos(Creoles).> o Culture of the Philippines, cultural description in article format.> o Philippine cuisine, snack of the culture.> o Filipino language, the national language of the> Philippines based primarily on Tagalog language.> o Filipino Sign Language, which is also known as Philippine> Sign Language.> o Filipino martial arts> o Filipino people, a citizen or native of the Philippines.> o Filipina can also be used to denote a female Filipino.> o Filipinos (snack food), branded cookies manufactured by> Kraft Foods and United Biscuits in Spain and Holland.>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino
“It also serves as a base for Filipino, one of the two officiallanguages of the Philippines”You're wrong. Your own sources prove you wrong ! You dirty liar. Oneof the official languages of the Philippines is Filipino. You dirtyliar./
And what else?
Here, why don't you read this.http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/tagalog_mainpage.htm
Your site proved you wrong. You said Filipino is not a language of thePhilippines.”TAGALOG is one of the major languages spoken in the Philippines,mostly by people from the Tagalog regions in the main island of Luzon. It is the lingua franca in Metro Manila, the national capital regionof the country. It also serves as a base for Filipino, one of thetwo official languages of the Philippines (along with English)”What is one of the official languages of the Philippines according toyour sources? Filipino. You are a dirty liar and are wrong!
Tagalog is not a dialect. It is the register of the national languageof the Philippines called Filipino.
Tagalog is a dialect, according to your own sources. Don't blame me for the references you used.And it's one of the two 'official' languages.
Tagalog is not a dialect. Its standardized form, commonly calledFilipino, is the national language and one of two official languagesof the Philippines.
Tagalog is a dialect, according to your own sources. Why did you use sources that don't agree with you?It is one of two official languages, one is the tagalog dialect of course, the other is English.
Tagalog is not a dialect. Its standardized form is called Filipino andis the national and official language of the Philippines.
Tagalog is the dialect of one island, the largest island. Read your own sources.And English is the official language, along with that local dialect.
Tagalog in ts standardized form is known as Filipino the nationallanguage and official language of the Philippines
Tagalog is a dialect, the islands don't have a standardized language, they have two official languages, Tagalog (A dialect from the largest island) and English.
The islands have a national official language. It's called Filipino.You are wrong. Tagalog is not a dialect.
The islands have two official languages. English and the local dialect from the largest island, Tagalog.
Filipino and English. A dialect from one island can not be a nationalor an Official language. Is hillbilly the national or officiallanguage of America? What about Valley girl? Stupid. Filipino is thenational and Official language of the Philippines. It's in theirconstitution.
Tagalog and English.Words are so hard for you, aren't they? Like goat and marriage, and muslim and peace.You put the strangest ones together.
Filipino is not a dialect. It is the national and official language ofthe Philippines. Either way you're wrong. You said there was no suchthing as a Filipino language. That is wrong. You're wrong.
Tagalog is a dialect, and one of two official languages. English of course is the other.Are you upset because even the muslim rebels in the south won't learn farsi?
Either way you're wrong because you said there was no language calledFilipino. That is wrong. Filipino is the national language of thePhilippines and is the Official language of the Philippines. You arewrong.
There isn't, there are two official languages, Tagalog and EnglishYou just won't admit you're a stupid fool that squatted and prayed behind the guy with bad gas at the mosque last week.
. What is Filipino?
You are wrong, even by your own sources.What a troll, things not going well with the goat?
I am not wrong. You're the one that said there is no such languagecalled Filipino. You were wrong when you said spanish is the mainlanguage of the Philippines. You're stupid. Filipino is the nationallanguage of the Philippines just like French is the national languageof the French. You don't even know the difference from a Filipinoaccent and a french accent. I don't expect you to know about thenational language of the Philippines. You don't even know thatFilipino is their national language.
You are wrong, yet again. As always.Just like that iranian nuclear project and the speed showing on the centrifuges.
You're the one that mistakenly took a Filipino accent for a Frenchaccent not me. And it's you that has to back-track and try to saveface. Not me. You're the one that is wrong. Filipino is the nationallanguage of the Philippines. You are wrong. You said spanish was themain language and that there was no such thing as a Filipino language.You were wrong.
No, you're the one who mistakenly sent me a wrong link.What a loser. Did you know the scientists who didn't make it to work?
I sent the link. Did you? No. I did. You thought a Filipino accent(which you don't even admit exists) was a french one. You know nothingof the Filipino language which is why you mistook for a french accent.It's because you're stupid.
Yes, you did. And I do know a french accent.So, any motorcycles scare you on the way to work this morning?
No you don't. If you did you would know the difference from a Filipinoaccent and a french accent. You don't even know the people of thePhilippines have their own language called Filipino.
I do know the difference. That's why I keep insisting that you just sent the wrong link.Instead of stooping to saying you're an inbred muslim moron who's iranian english is so bad you wouldn't understand the information you use as a source.
If you know the difference then why did you call a filipino man afrench man? Why did you confuse a filipino accent with a frenchaccent? Haven't you ever heard a french accent before?
Because the man you sent a link to, was a white guy with black hair and a french accent.If you wanted me to see someone else then you should have sent the right link.
Why do you think there was a french accent? There wasn't. You assumedthat there was one but you were wrong.
Because the link you sent me had a white guy with black hair speaking with a strong french accent.Do you need me to type that out another 500 times before you can get the big words?
You said they were frenchmen. They are not. You are wrong.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7siFxLL8uoFilipino and American.
I didn't ever say he was a frenchman. I said he spoke with a french accent. That could be upper class folks from Lebanon.
Nope. You said they were frenchmen.
There was no 'they'. I said that the white man with black hair in the first link spoke with a french accent.Are you having trouble reading, do they not have glasses in Iran?
You said they were both frenchmen then you backtracked and said youheard a french accent, and then when I told you that there were nofrench men and that you were mistaken and what you heard was aFilipino accent, you then said the Filipinos had no national languageand that they spoke spanish. You were mistaken on all accounts.
I said that the first link was to a white guy with black hair and spoke with a french accent.Doesn't that sound kind of familiar?
You said they were frenchmen. Then you bakctracked and said that youheard a french accent. You were mistaken on all accounts.
I said 'he' spoke with a distince french accent. Your farsi translator must have gotten it wrong.
You originally said they were frenchmen and then you backtracked andsaid french accent after I proved you wrong.
No you did. You said they were frenchmen then when I proved you wrongyou got all scared and backtracked and said you heard a french accentand then when you found out there was no french accent, you had tobacktrack some more all because you wont admit that you are wrong. Youeven said the Philippines doesn't have their own language. I provedyou wrong again.