At least six NATO soldiers were killed today in five separate attacks across Afghanistan. The nationalities of the soldiers were not yet made public, and the locations of the attacks were vague.
The only specific location was an attack against a NATO convoy in Kandahar, between the airport and the city. The attacker reportedly detonated a car bomb near the convoy, tossing a vehicle into a ravine. One NATO soldier died in the attack.
Other attacks included a mortar strike in western Afghanistan, killing two, a rocket attack in eastern Afghanistan killing one, a small arms gunbattle in the south killing one, and a roadside bomb in the south killing one.
The mounting death toll among both civilians and NATO forces have been fueling opposition to the nearly nine year long war. Predictions of another record toll in 2010 have been long-standing, and as winter slowly comes to an end it seems violence is poised to spike once again.
Does anyone want to write about –what control has USA on EU (NUTSO) to fight in it's invassions?
What appears–}sreal has main leash control on USA and subsquently Uncle Sam has leashes on ever NATO country.When one nation refuses to send troops(as/in Greece), Big daddy Rothchilds clean up team come in to collect–KosherMaffia?–You Bet!
Well that's good news. Too bad it wasn't 60 or 600.
One can understand why a soldier be willing to die in DEFENSE of his country (his native land and his kindred people) against an aggressor. But, how can one understand a soldier who is willing to die for an organization, especially when that organization is guilty of engaging in unjustified, immoral and aggressive war against a sovereign country that never attacked it? I'm an American citizen. I love my native land. If she were directly attacked by an aggressor, I would be willing to fight and die for her. But, tell me, why in the hell would I want to fight and possibly die in an aggressive war for some organization that is called a NATO???