A tiny nation with no real security threats, one would have likely been puzzled up until this week at the massive military spending of Bahrain, and its stockpiling of US-made weapons. The crackdowns of the past few days make it clear: these arms were meant to target the public, not some foreign enemy.
Over the years the US has sold Bahrain an enormous collection of weapons, including the F5 Freedom Fighter warplanes that are in the skies now, literally fighting freedom. The tanks that roll through the streets of Manama are M60A3 tanks, made in Detroit in the 1990s, with an historical market out front lauding the plant as the Arsenal of Democracy. The arsenal, it seems, turned on democracy at some point.
Indeed much as the violent crackdowns in Egypt did during their uprising, much of the brutality in Bahrain is also clearly marked “made in America,” where the Obama Administration, determined to see its status as world’s largest weapons maker, has only grown the sales to brutal regimes.
And really, it should have been obvious from the start. Why would Bahrain, an island nation, need scores of heavily armored tanks, if not to turn them on the public? Is not the privilege of being an island nation that you don’t have to worry about heavy armor? Who exactly did American arms dealers believe these tanks would target, and if they knew all along they would be used to crush dissent, how can Congress not be planning massive investigations?
Congress planning massive investigations? Do you mean the very rats who sell us out daily and have pushed through these sales of arms to dictators and despots through the decades might suddenly have an epiphany? Not at all likely. My question to Ms. Clinton, should I not be hustled off bleeding a-la Mr. McGovern, would be "Would you turn our own military on its citizens come the day they decide they'd had a gut full of the likes of you and the rest of the Feds?"
And the answer to that (probably) rhetorical question is, "Mos' definitely!!" If the Gulf States Sunni ruled Shite populations can face the armaments of the US, the same can happen here. And if you believe that it can't happen here consider the consequences. What happened when the southern states attempted to constitutionally "secede" from the union? The oligarchs went to war to stop it. The justifications for putting down uprisings remain – civil order will be maintained and those who (really) rule will remain in control. The politicians are just frontmen for the money men who rule. The pols are all expendable. That's why the elections really don't matter as those who "win" are not free to do as they (or their constituents) please. That's why we are just a firecracker away from full martial law. But, that's just this old Curmudgeon's opinion…
Great job, Jason.
john v. walsh
Sometimes the sale of military gear is an end in itself. The conquest of Bahrain by American influence would understandably involve the transfer of Bahraini wealth into US coffers, in this case the MIC coffers. Don't call it theft, call it "protection". So one question might be "Were the Bahraini tanks purchased outright or through foreign aid?"
Armored personnel carriers and machine guns are quite enough to control domestic unrest. Anything more is profit-driven symbolism.
They probably use the Iranian bogeyman to justify the arms transfers to those gulf states.
The United States of Arms, the biggest purveyor of death and destruction ever known to humanity.