Less than a year after Iraq’s parliament asked the US troops to leave, troop levels are rapidly being cut. The Iraqi Joint Operations Command appears uncomfortable with this, saying that they believe the foreign forces need to maintain a presence to fight ISIS.
Since the whole point of join operations command is to manage operations with foreign forces, one can see where the command’s usefulness might be in jeopardy with the pullout. Other Iraqi officials seem to disagree on the importance, believing that the foreign troops are no longer needed.
It’s hard to make the case anymore, as nobody in Iraq has been fighting ISIS force in a long time. The foreign troops have mostly been fighting with Iraq’s own militias, and even that seems to be winding down with a conditional suspension of attacks.
A spokesman for Ketaib Hezbollah says that the ceasefire is conditional on the expulsion of foreign troops, which means this push for troops to stay, and fight a non-existent ISIS, would also mean trying to provoke a war with the militias.
Does not sound like something coming from Iraq officially — more like US wishful thinking to have somebody to fight. Anybody.
Or fight Iraqi militias that actually defeated ISIS. Is there an ISIS 2.0 brewing in UAE-Israeli kitchen? Iraqi militias may be a problem.
Since Saudis got out of the business in June 2017, the leftover ISIS lingered in US controlled area in Raqqa for a year. And it was all over in 2018. Clearly, somebody is missing ISIS. Amazingly enough — US citizens who pay up are never told who has been bankrolling and supplying ISIS.