UPDATE: The Associated Press has pulled the original article by George Jahn and it is being replaced by a more benign article called “Iran to stop enrichment if given nuclear fuel” by Nasser Karimi. (2/9/2010)
In a widely-circulated article which has further fueled Western hysteria about the prospect of an imminent war with Iran, the Associated Press today claimed that Iran’s uranium enrichment program move, an effort to produce medical isotopes which are rapidly running out in the nation, was a secret plot to build nuclear weapons.
The article, entitled “Iran moves closer to nuke warhead capacity,” claims that Iran had informed the IAEA that it “will increase its ability to make nuclear warheads,” an allegation which is not only unsupported by fact but even goes beyond the ample bellicose Western statements quoted in the piece.
In fact the IAEA’s own confirmation of the Iranian statement says simply that Iran is planning to begin efforts for “production of less than 20 percent enriched uranium,” noted by the AP piece as “just below the threshold for high enriched uranium” but actually well short of the 90 percent plus needed for weapons grade material.
Iran has made it clear than the approximately 20 percent enriched uranium will be used in an effort to produce fuel rods for its US-built Tehran reactor, needed in the creation of medical isotopes. The move came as efforts for a third party enrichment deal, which would provide Iran with access to fuel rods from overseas, has stalled amid international ire.
But the AP piece glossed over Iran’s acceptance of the third party enrichment deal last week, a move which it claims was “welcomed internationally” but which was actually roundly condemned by Western officials who claimed that accepting their own demands was an effort to “stall.”
In fact this was the key to Iran’s move, as German officials insisted that Iran’s acceptance couldn’t be accepted, and that they would have to start a new round of negotiations, something Western officials have repeatedly rejected. With the prospect for a third-party enrichment deal at best speculative going forward, Iran was left with the choice of abandoning nuclear medicine treatments for thousands of patients or pushing forward with efforts to become self-sufficient in the process.
And while British officials insisted, and the AP was quick to point out, that they doubt Iran’s capability to actually produce the fuel rods, other experts said they would likely be able to, and Iran seemed to have few options but to try.
At the end of the day though, the biggest problem with the piece was the reference to “nuke warheads,” a technology which Iran isn’t even accused of moving forward. If Iran isn’t even capable of making fuel rods for medical reactors out of 20 percent enriched uranium it is hoping to produce, it is absolutely absurd and irresponsible to claim that Iran is nearing the capability of producing nuclear-capable warheads, which would require not only weapons-grade uranium which they are not producing, but advanced delivery systems.
With Iran’s enrichment facilities under 24-hour IAEA surveillance, they will be able to confirm that neither Iran’s current 3.5 percent uranium or its speculative 20 percent uranium is diverted to anything but civilian purposes. The surveillance would also instantly confirm if Iran began enriching uranium beyond 20 percent, meaning the threat of Iran suddenly acquiring a nuclear weapon is entirely illusory. Western officials, and some writers at the Associated Press, however, see fit to look beyond the lack of concrete threats and instead rely on public fear of the unknown to make the case for escalating tensions beyond all reason, and bringing the West ever closer to a needless war with Iran.
Yeah, there is a plot all right…. Buy it ain't to build nukes with 20% enriched uranium… The plot is more likely to create uninformed concern and hysteria within the U.S. and the international community to pressure Iran to forgo it's "inalienable rights" among which is the right to enrich Uranium and process fuel which signatories to the NPT enjoy… Or to foment a military response to protect the current status Quo of Israel hegemony in the Eastern Med and nearby.. Jason bangs the hammer down hard on this latest FARCE…. This latest provocation is akin to the mushroom cloud deceptions of fearmongering by the last clutch of liars and murderers to infest out highest offices of governance…
Oh, "O"…. Please say it isn't so….!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You would think the bloodlust of the United States Government and its lickspittles in MSM would be satiated with all the death, destruction and misery they have caused in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,and Somalia, but you would be wrong. These homocidal maniacs now sense the opportunity to kill thousands and thousands of innocent Persians through starvation sanctions or war. Concocting a fairy tale about the evil Mullahs of Iran planning to build nuclear weapons, and then explode those weapons over some major cities in the United States is the method they are using to scare the sheeple into supporting their sicko taste for torture and murder. The United States government and the MSM want a war Iran, and they do not care how many lies they have to tell to get it.
starvation sanctions OR war?
No.
The operative word is AND.
As in "starvation sanctions AND THEN war".
This is part of the pattern. Sanctions ARE an act of war. The hegemonists are well down the path already. If we dont stop them here they WILL go to war.
Sure, they hope to provoke a cassus belli through the sanctions, but did we learn nothing from Iraq? They will do it anyway, without one.
“Humanity stands before one of its most difficult tests since World War II,” said Netanyahu, who presided over the dinner at Jerusalem's King David Hotel. “The radical Islamic regime threats [sic] the well-being of the state of Israel, the region, and all of humanity.”
The propaganda against Iran, just like before the Iraq War, is made in Tel Aviv.
And Americans are too busy blaming "their" government, the CIA, Democrats, Republicans etc. to figure out who their real enemy is.
I would say that the United States' problems are structural as well as conspiratorial. The machinery of government has grown monstrously large—much too powerful and complex, and much too replete with those hidden valves and levers which inevitably draw the fingers of enterprising gremlins. Without the United States' excessively centralized and increasingly secretive system of governance, without its titanic military power and byzantine tangle of committees, agencies and countless corruptible placemen (among whom we may as well place most members of the mainstream media), neither the Israeli Lobby nor the legion of other foreign and domestic gremlins currently infesting the works would find such a ready tool in American government and such a handy cash-cow in the American people. In short, the regime in Tel Aviv is no friend of the American people—but their REAL enemy, the ultimate enabler of their exploitation, remains the state.
Basically what's happened is that the U.S. Empire has been hijacked by a Satanic cult: organized Zionist J e w r y. Certainly the Empire, representing a dangerous accumulation of power, was always "evil" and up-to-no-good, but what our present Zionist Masters have accomplished in the way of control is a marvelous feat.
Let's face it, it's not like we happened to leave the back door unlocked and they merely walked in and took over; rather, the horrific situation we're in today is the product of ingenuity, lots of hard work and dedication, organizational skills, a unique understanding of the weaknesses of human nature, and a breathtaking moral depravity.
Lastly, as far as the "state" is concerned…let's face it, as long as there is "evil" in the world, i.e., evil people, there will always be a "state" of some kind. The "state" is the political embodiment of the evil that lives among us. We cannot get rid of it – the best we can hope to do is to keep it from totally destroying us, IMO.
Point taken, Nelson. The militant Zionists ARE up to no good. I totally agree. And I am not an anarchist. I think a "stateless" civilization unlikely. A limited republican government—a return, if you will, to the core principles of the Founding—would be ideal and would make the US immune (or at least resistant) to such manipulation. Pessimist that I am, however, I think that, at this point, this too is unlikely.
I do not, however, think it is particularly useful to blame ALL of the U.S.'s problems on having "been hijacked by a Satanic cult: organized Zionist J e w r y." Israel deserves strong criticism—and the Lobby's hold on Congress and other US institutions is reprehensible—but this sort of rhetoric (which has kind of bizarro-world Bushian flavor about it) plays into the hands of propagandists who dismiss sites like Antiwar.com and indeed the antiwar movement in general as being composed of "anti-semites" and *gasp* nutty "conspiracy theorists"!
Actually, what's "bizarro world", IMO, is having a video clip, in the public domain, which IRREFUTABLY shows cutter charges in action, in the North Tower of the WTC complex, on 09/11/2001, and we can't even get an investigation.
Therein, you can SEE WITH YOUR OWN TWO EYES, that 9/11 was an inside job; an inside job that murdered 3000 people on U.S. soil, and launched illegal, immoral wars of aggression that have already killed over a million people and threaten yet millions more.
But I'm the "nut" here, for pointing out what are simply INDISPUTABLE FACTS and the STRAIGHTFORWARD INFERENCES based on those facts?
Actually, what's "bizarro world", IMO, is having a video clip, in the public domain, which IRREFUTABLY shows cutter charges in action, in the North Tower of the WTC complex, on 09/11/2001, and we can't even get an investigation.
Therein, you can SEE WITH YOUR OWN TWO EYES, that 9/11 was an inside job; an inside job that murdered 3000 people on U.S. soil, and launched illegal, immoral wars of aggression that have already killed over a million people and threaten yet millions more.
But I'm the "nut" here, for pointing out what are simply INDISPUTABLE FACTS and the STRAIGHTFORWARD INFERENCES based on those facts?
I think a Frank Chodorov quote (which comes to me second-hand from a recent Will Grigg article: http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w129.html) is somewhat apposite here:
In response to McCarthyite fears about Communist infiltration of the federal bureaucracy, Chodorov said, "The only thing to do, if you want to rid the bureaucracy of Communists, is to abolish the bureaucracy." Statist conservatives, of course, had no interest in abolishing the bureaucracy; for "[t]hey too worship Power."
The case is similar here. Militant Zionists may well be behind the drive for war with Iran, but it is the system, the structure itself—bloated, corrupt and perhaps irreparably *broken*—that enables such intrigues and invites these repugnant intriguers. The Imperial Capital is a locus of excessively concentrated power; and it contains numerous back passages through which that power can be accessed by the unprincipled, the corrupt, the well-connected, the wealthy, etc. By its very nature it breeds intrigue. It is a perpetual temptation to the wicked, the greedy and the power-hungry. And as long as it exists as an Imperial Capital it will be infested by militant Zionists, military-industrial-security complex lobbyists, Turkish deep state drug traffickers and countless other intriguers and purveyors of corruption. The only way to purge these rats is to abolish highly centralized imperial government. Easier said than done, yes?
My point, then, was not that the Israelis are blameless—but that, on some level, Americans SHOULD "blame 'their' government, the CIA," etc. And we can scream about the Israeli lobby and other corrupt influences all we like—but we are deluded if we think political action within the current system or even supposed "reform" of that system will make them go away. The State will not fix the State.
If someone has different ideas or finds mine to be particularly mistaken, feel free to voice your own—instead of just summarily hitting the "thumbs down" button. I know the button thing is much more viscerally satisfying, but reasoned rebuttals can be a good deal more interesting—heck, even educational.
Electrical power plants aside, Iran NEEDS nukes – nuclear weapons that is. Anybody remember what just happened in Gaza? How's about the slaughter in Lebanon a few years ago? Remember the million cluster bombs Israel dropped as a farewell gift?
The Middle East will know peace when Israel's neighbors can defend themselves. And who would want to deny a soverign people a little security – who except for the War Pigs, that is?
God Bless America.
To me is just amazing how the so called “international community” condemns every single move the Iranian nation makes in the nuclear arena but they fail to condemn the moves made by states like India, which just recently tested a better nuclear warhead and rocket. Plain hipocrisy.
If you were in Iran's position, surrounded on three sides by the forces of a world power that has shown a willingness to invade your neighbors, or supply them with weapons in wars against you, wouldn't you be interested in building a bomb? its a logical move.
It looks like the AP has revised their story and removed the worst of their distortions and falsehoods mentioned in this article. Does anyone have a copy of the original AP article they can post…? Thanks…
Mv Guy hits it right on the head. Have the sheep panic and rush over precipice. We lost so much when John F. Kennedy was murdered by the C.I.A. This "system" is rotten to the core. Frightenly so.
I would add the Mossad to the kennedy assination.
Notice, no-one dares to ask why AP ( Associated Press),
news network sides with }srael at all times. Being a sinister syndicate news media operation (Syndicate comes from the French word syndicat which means trade union).Most USA media belong to this operation and need a license from AP.If any newspaper writes a story conflicting AP's license agreements,it will be revoked. }sreal Maffia? You bet!
You write what we dish out or else–chop-chop!
"The truth is always the first casualty of war" – and it certainly appears that ALL wars are based on LIES – certainly nearly all of the wars the U.S. has been involved in have been based on LIES! John Kennedy – after the Bay of Pigs fiasco wanted – "to break up the CIA into a 1000 pieces" – instead the CIA (most likely with the Mossad) murdered JFK and we've NOT had a U.S. president stand up to Israel since then! When will Americans ever find out that Israel is our ONLY enemy in the Middle East? – that 9/11 was most likely done by the Mossad?
There is no such thing as news….. only propaganda.
In early 1960's it was Israel who was trying to covertly aquire WMD.
JFK was threatning severe sanctions against the Jewish state.
For a country that has practised assasination as part of it's state craft
JFK at that point was deemed a "threat to the Jewish people."
His father was defintely considered an enemy,especially for his proclamations
during WWII.
I see, so you all willing to ignore Ahmadinejad's comments on wiping the Isreal off the map? Interesting! Iran is still buying fuel(Gas for cars) from other countries because we can't refine it ourselves. Billions of dollars leave our country every year to buy Gasoline. It has been 30 years since revolution and we have not spend the time and money to refine crude oil in our country, very simple task comparing to enrich uranium. Makes you wonder! Don't get me wrong, I am proud of my country but you are naiive to think its just for peacful purposes.
As you know, Ahmadinejad has stated that he would like to see a referendum in Israel/Palestine regarding the future of that area – quite a reasonable policy, of course, except in the eyes of Israeli and US warmongers. He's no Ghandi, of course, but neither are Obama and the other 'leaders' threatening Iran over and over and over again.
So the real question for you, if you aren't just a troll, is why do you think it is ok for us to threaten Iran, but not for Iran to threaten Israel? Of course, you know the answer. Both sides need to stop threatening the other side.
TROLL? just because I have an opinion different than yours? nice going.
As for REFERENDUM in Isreal/Palestine: you are funny. Ahmadi stole the election from his own people. Killing us in the streets for peacful demonstrations you think he even knows what REFERENDUM means?
You hate Israel, I get it, but don't use my country (IRAN) to fight Isreal. My people are enduring high rate of inflation at the same time Ahmadi is spending billions to help Hamas and Hezbolah. If you care about Palestinians then ask Saudi's why don't they support them, they are Palestinian's Arab brothers, we are Persians and don't care about neither Arabs nor Jews.
And your point is ("the wiping off the map" aside which was rebutted on this site alone several times)?
"the wiping off the map" aside? do you even know where Ahmadi comes from? WHo his mentor is? do you know what " Imam zamani" means? Do you know they believe in dragging the world into chaos to create the condition for twelveth Imam to rise? THAT MEANS END OF THE WORLD. He wants to push the world toward chaos and you say the wiping off the map" aside? lol
Thankyou Antiwar!!!!!!! When I read that article yesterday, I was speechless. There's been a lot of brazen anti-Iran-pro-war propaganda, but that was so far over the top even in this environment of war hysteria, that it left me speechless.
But what I'm wondering if one of the reasons for the Iran hysteria peaking now is that the political establishment would like to distract the antiwar movement from what is going on in Afghanistan, where it appears that a Fallujah-style war crime is underway.
Iran would have to be crazy NOT to be working on developing nuclear weapons, it's the only thing that will prevent US/Israel from attacking. Even once they have them they're still no threat to the US since if Iran attacked the US the US retaliation could turn Iran into a sheet of green glass. If they want to nuke it out with Israel that's OK, maybe eliminate that little parasitic turd of a country.
This is all silly, Iran is entitled to enrich uranium to 20% by International Law, since 20% is what medical and power requirements dictate. Weapons require 90% enrichment, which IS NOT happening … so this whole line of discussion is NOT RELEVANT to anything.
MakingWaves,
The original can be seen here and here.
For more analysis of this type of AP/MSM propaganda, see: The Mossadegh Project, DetainThis and CASMII.
Seems not only AP is lying–check national Geographic 911 documentary
3 clips video are given here–be shown Feb 14
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/series/insi…
Jet fuel streamed down the fire escape stairways and blew up the towers-What?
Blows your mind–do they think we are that stupid:^/
part 3
As expected, a very few notes were published by the corporate media rejecting, dismissing or belittling WPO poll. The media succeeded “beautifully” to HIDE that critical News item and similar to Iraq war distortions, where after no WMD was found still 70% of the public believed in those LIES, at present the majority of the consumers of the corrupt media still firmly believe there was a (definite) “fraud” in the Iranian election!.
For many conscientious American scholars the hiding or downplaying of such important information was intolerable. Since the corporate media influences the Foreign Policies of USA and the present Iran/US relations have critical importance, there had be a counter-spin to warn the public and make them understand the “behind the scene” realities.
part 4 of 4
Probably on the basis of such dutiful concern, a small group of the University of the Maryland Statisticians went to work examining additional sets of data and on February 3, 2010, published another report. For knowledgeable experts on the fields of Statistics and Probability the new report leaves no doubt that Ahmadinejad won the election by a wide margin as asserted by TFT and previous WOP polls.
Go to theraceforiran.com Watch the videos…you might also see the source of such big lies and who was behind it….see for yourself how the neocons deceptively convinced millions in the world IRI is a illegitimate and the election was definitely fraudulent.
part 1 of 4
Iran and Neocons…..day after day more dirts are uncovered.
Long time ago, Chomsky and Harris in their famous book of “Manufacturing Consent” wrote a famous expression which is something like “The crime of the corporate media is not in how they spread LIES or twist the truth, it is also in how they HIDE the important News from the public”
The issue of Iran, especially the June 2009 election is an amazing historical feat of the Neocons and their media where that issue fits so well to the core of the above expression.
What was the mighty colossal LIE they spread during the election? Do phrases like “Widespread Rigging” and “Fraudulent Election”, “Shameless vote stuffing” sound familiar?
part 2
What was the important News they HID from the public? In September 2009 World Public Opinion (WPO) of University of Maryland published a poll on Iran. On the Election issue, this poll matched very closely with the Interpolated / Extrapolated data of American Terror Free Tomorrow (TFT)l and the actual results published by the Ministry of Interior of Iran. The Error of the such simple Math-Model was less than 5% (with another realistic Weighting the Error was about 1%).
Wow !! What a grand Bomb-Blast…….there was NO FRAUD in the June 2009 Iranian election, and if there were some irregularities they were found to be “Statistically Insignificant”!.
@ Ali.
Sure you are from Iran. Go back to your bar mitzvah party. Lmao
AP hasn't "pulled" the story; do a simple Google search on "Iran moves closer to nuke warhead capacity" and you'll find it on multiple news sites.
"The first casualty in war is truth"
AP owned by Reuters, Reuters owned by Rothschild, warmongering by those who do it best.
Mr. Jason Ditz and his colleagues deserves our praise for keeping up the good work they are doing at antiwar.com.
Dominant perception in the lands of Islam is that down the lane of history Western leaders have shown paucity, at times, absence of any moral standards while dealing with Islam or Islamic regimes. They usually claim to uphold the standard of justice and fair play, however, in most cases whenever any Islamic regime is involved their sense of appropriation flounders.
It is considered hegemonic that Iran is being forced to accede to all unjust demands made by the West as a rule. Now as Iran has decided to enrich uranium up to 20 percent for its medical centres in Tehran, quite under the terms of NPT, the West is maddened at it. Iran is one of pioneering signatories of NPT and the treaty allows its members to exactly do that. Just to test the nerves of the West, Iran on 31st anniversary of its revolution on 11th Feb. has declared itself a nuclear nation.
Theme of regime change:-
As regards Iran's nuclear programme certain circles in the Islamic world think that after remaining apologetic and defensive for many years on its nuclear programme, Iran is exerting and showing muscles: But at the same time guarded eagerness to take the issue to its logical conclusion. Iran believes that West’s attitude towards Iran under the system of Waliat-e Faqih will continue to be so even after the nuclear issue has been resolved. It is not the nuclear issue; it is the regime that’s at stake.