President Trump’s claim Gen. Qassem Soleimani was going to attack four  embassies was immediately suspect, both because of the absence of  evidence offered with it, and its odd specificity. It sounded made up.  It was.
 
 Trump’s accusation is rapidly falling apart,  with Defense Secretary Mark Esper conceding that there simply was no  evidence behind Trump’s claim. Even Trump admitted it was just his  belief, and it seems it wasn’t backed by anything other than a wild  hunch from the president which everyone else in the administration had  to pretend was gospel truth. 
 
 On top of that, allegations that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” at  all don’t seem well founded, as evidenced by the president having  signed off on killing Soleimani seven months ago, just whenever the  military might get around to it. 
 
 So with all those lies behind us, President Trump now is taking the position that “it doesn’t really matter” if the four embassy thing was made up, or that the “imminent threat” claim was untrue. 
 
 Trump now says that Soleimani deserved to die whether or not anything he  said about him was true, because of his “horrible past.” Soleimani’s  history as a top military leader for a country the US doesn’t get along  with would in essence cover this. 
 
 And yet despite Trump’s claims, US law has made clear that political assassinations are illegal.  Claims of “imminent threats” are so common by the military specifically  because it offers them some vague legal pretext to circumvent the law  against assassination for policy’s sake. Having lost that, Trump’s claim  that it “doesn’t matter” seems to fly in the face of American legal  standards.
 
 
As ‘Four Embassy’ Allegation Falls Apart, Trump Says It Doesn’t Matter
Trump says general deserved to die even without 'imminent' threat
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      ![Image Preview]() 
    
  


