The New York Times may have referred to it as “The Secret History of the Push to Strike Iran,” but it’s hardly a secret that Israeli and US hawks have been angling for a war against Iran for decades. 
 Trying to advance a war narrative is a high priority for the hawks, and  recent reports suggest that the Netanyahu government is once again actively considering just unilaterally attacking Iran without US permission.
 That may seem like a very bold move, but some in the cabinet are arguing  it really isn’t, saying Trump’s determination to be the most pro-Israel  president ever means he’s probably not do anything to actively oppose  Israeli aggression. 
 In recent history, of course, US policy has been to ignore Israeli  aggression, or outright endorse it internationally. Israeli officials  had reason to believe that President Obama would resist an attack  however during their last major run-up to an attack, in 2012, which they ultimately called off. 
 Timing may be the key to any immediate attack. Israel faces elections in  just two weeks, and Netanyahu’s recent attacks on “Iranian proxies”  across the region were already seen as a bid for a last minute bump. He  may believe, with polls still showing him trailing, that a direct attack  is the next step.
 The history of Israel’s foreign policy in recent years, indeed decades  has been heavily Iran-centric, both with the various governments playing  up Iran as an existential threat, and lobbying heavily to keep the US  from making any positive diplomatic efforts. 
 This long-time acrimony is no secret to Iran, either, which is why Iran  has spent the past decades building up its air defenses and potential  retaliation in the event the long-threatened attack happens. 
Israeli Officials Consider Attacking Iran, Believing Trump Won’t Oppose It
Israel's long-time ambition for Iran War may be coming to a head
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      
    
  


