With some activists warning that the advent of armies of vicious killer 
robots could be just 3-4 years away, a large number of nations are 
trying to get out in front of that, with an eye toward a global ban on 
such robots. 
The EU and UN both heavily support such a ban, and Germany is seen
 as a major proponent. Yet several nations seem keen to resist the idea,
 as they envision powerful armies of metal men crushing their enemies.
The US and Russia, unsurprisingly, are leading the opposition to the global ban,
 calling it premature. In practice this really just means they oppose 
any limitations that would prevent them from building killer robots. 
Britain, Israel, and Australia are also opposed. 
These are the usual suspects whenever people are opposing a global ban 
on something that  would be used to commit war crimes. While Britain’s 
Defence Ministry denied any plans to build any “fully autonomous” killer
 robots of their own, they announced this week that they are in the 
process of developing killer drone swarms with theoretically full 
autonomy. 
The US is sure to be the leader in the field, at least early on, with 
America’s huge fleet of attack drones likely to eventually be modified 
to take out the need for a “button pusher” to authorize strikes, and 
simply letting the drone decide who lives and who dies. 
Since the US provides little oversight in how they decide on drone 
strikes, the near-term difference may be negligible, just someone else 
killing indiscriminately with no consequences. Yet human ethics are 
always at least somewhere at the far end of the spectrum a limiting 
factor to how many people the fleet can kill. Given the Pentagon’s 
proclivity for high body counts in recent air wars, simulating that in 
the AI of the new killer robots will certainly be a low priority, or one
 eschewed entirely in the name of a more efficient, and therefore 
merciless, killer. 
US, Russia Lead Efforts to Prevent Global Ban on Killer Robots
UN, EU support ban, but major military powers are investing heavily 
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      ![Image Preview]() 
    
  


