With Iraqi parliament’s ordered recount at least somewhat derailed by a weekend fire at one of the ballot warehouses in Baghdad some officials are calling for a revote. A spokesman for PM Hayder Abadi, however, says only the Supreme Court can make that happen.
“This is a matter for the Federal Court and not for the executive branch,” noted Saad al-Hadithi, when asked for Abadi’s comments on the parliamentary speaker’s demand to repeat the vote. It’s not clear how the mechanism for such a re-run would work.
The May 12 election, after all, already happened, and results were published. Parliament called for recounts nationwide amid claims of violations. They also fired the entire election commission, though the commission is contesting that in court.
Iraqi officials who are likely to benefit from a re-vote are those pushing it the most heavily, and claiming the weekend fire is “deliberate” and proves the need for it. The parliament speaker calling for a re-vote, for instance, actually lost his seat, while Abadi’s party was a distant third in the election.
Can a Muslim country govern itself as a constitutional republic?
Not likely.
Does the name “Indonesia” ring any bells? How about “Iran?”
Tom, Iran, a constitutional republic???
I’ll give you Indonesia for now,
but things are trending negative there.
Exactly what do you think a “constitutional republic” is? The Islamic Republic of Iran has a constitution.
Iran, also known as the Islamic Republic,
(“Republic” is used here to confuse the gullible), has a theocratic government, in which most policies are based on Islamic religious ideologies, Shariah.
The position of Supreme Leader (dictator) in addition to being the Commander in Chief, the Supreme Leader is the head of state, and the superintendent of the three arms of government, that is the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. The Supreme Leader’s tenure lasts until his death. The country has had only two Supreme Leaders, with the current one being Ayatollah Ali Khameini.
No separation of powers, and Islamic law is supreme as
interpreted by the aptly named Supreme Leader.
It’s a theocratic dictatorship, no matter how they try to dress it up.
I’ll ask again: What do you mean by “constitutional republic?”
It APPEARS that you mean one particular type of republic, and one particular type of constitution, as opposed to other kinds of republics and constitutions. Why not be specific?
A republic means the people elect representatives
to represent— them;
and the people should approve (by vote) a constitution and
have the ability to amend said constitution.
A Supreme Leader negates all of that and the will of the people, hence
the Iranian “Republic” is a republic in name only.
The people don’t have the ability to amend the US Constitution. So is the US not a constitutional republic?
Through their representatives in the US,
the people can amend the constitution.
Look, aside from all the semantics, the real difference is between the centralization of wealth and power or
the decentralization of wealth and power to the greatest degree.
Iran is heavily centralized,
the US, less so since 0bama was retired.
It makes it more difficult when they’ve suffered the casualties that Iraq has for the past 25 or so years.
Yeah, Saddam knew how to do it, right?