Preliminary results of the Saturday Iraq election show a major victory for cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s bloc, which has secured a plurality estimated at 54-55 seats. While going from that to a 165-seat majority is a long road, Sadr’s election performance, and decisive victory in Baghdad district, shows a major shift in Iraqi politics.
Multiple Shi’ite blocs dominate Iraq’s political scene, and are historically all cozy with the nation’s two main allies, Iran and the US. Sadr, by contrast, has staked out an independent, nationalist position. He’s positioned himself as the anti-corruption and anti-militia leader for Iraq, something very different from the other leaders.
This is going to make forming a coalition with another big bloc difficult, as Amiri’s bloc is very pro-militia, and Maliki’s State of Law bloc has been the target of a lot of the corruption complaints. Prime Minister Hayder Abadi’s faction may be a possibility, as Sadr has said it’s possible they could form a government together.
A Sadr-led government could be a big change in Iraq’s regional alignment. While Sadr is unlikely to totally disavow any of Iraq’s allies, both the US and Iran will be sad to see more easily controlled leaders replaced with more independent ones, and that could have a long-term drag on relations. Sadr is also an opponent of the US having troops in Iraq, and could push to end that open-ended deployment.
You forgot to mention the Communists. Aren’t the Chinese, you know, Communists?
Iraq elections: Sadr and communist allies leading at halfway stage
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/iraq-election-thrown-wide-open-outsider-alliances-show-strength-2062979280
I think this is a good thing. Iraq needs to define its own democratic identity free from outside influence if it is to have any hope of a unified existence, which I still think is a long shot but who knows. Sadr has always stood apart for his tenacity, that’s why his people elected him. I wish him the best.
Sadr was the immovable force that the U.S. Anglo attack Coalition encountered in Bagdad… The attackers couldn’t kill him, scare him off, or buy him. He was the only honest man standing. Sadr & Iatola Sistani forced the dimwit W to have elections by putting 100″s of thousands into the streets. Now his perseverance pays off a second time. The first time when he, they refused to give W the status of forces agreement W wanted. Which left American & coalition troops exposed to Iraqi law.. A big no no!!
I think that then, Hillary’s foreign legon (ISIS) started attacking Iraq and so it wanted the coalition troops to help get ISIS out and some status of forces accomodation was created to get the coalition back to fight ISIS. NOW that ISIS is dead guys walking, time for Sadr to get the infidels out AGAIN!
Doesn’t it seem like the whole game is a big waste of lives, time & treasure…. for all involved. Well except for the billions in cash the U.S. Put on trucks and drove around they say… It was supposed to be used to buy off adversarys. I wonder where those 18? Billion in 100s ended up. I’m sure some of you guys out there in internet land know. How about at least giving us guys stuck here stateside a few clues where?
What do you think Bianca…?????