After five years of virtually unanimous Congressional silence about the detention of US POW Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was released today in a prisoner exchange with the Taliban, House and Senate hawks lined up to condemn the deal that secured his release as “illegal” and a threat to US military interests.
House Armed Services Committee Chair Rep. Buck McKeon (R – CA) blasted the move as a violation of legal requirements to inform Congress 30 days before any releases of captive Taliban.
Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Mike Rogers (R – MI) declared himself “extremely troubled” by Bergdahl’s release, saying he believed it was a “fundamental shift in US policy” that would “threaten the lives of American soldiers for years to come.”
The putative “controversy” centers around the idea that the US “doesn’t negotiate with terrorists,” and that anyone captured is essentially out of luck, barring some dramatic, TV news-friendly rescue operation.
Mysteriously, this line of thinking doesn’t flow both ways, as officials assume trades increase Taliban incentive to capture US troops, but don’t imagine that they simultaneously might increase the US incentive to capture trade-bait Taliban. Ultimately, the view is that Taliban “hostage-taking” is a mercenary endeavor, but US military detentions have no ulterior motives.
The most insulting aspect of the hostility toward Bergdahl’s release is that President Obama was already openly talking about releasing the five “traded” Taliban detainees unilaterally in March 2012 as a “confidence-building measure.” At the time, it was considered comparatively non-controversial.
It was only in 2013, when the Taliban suggested they release Bergdahl in a “swap,” that the release of the five suddenly started seeing any real opposition, suggesting that from the hawkish viewpoint, getting Bergdahl as a bonus in the releases somehow made them worse, and that nearly 13 years into a US occupation of Afghanistan, Beghdahl’s release is the first real incentive the Taliban have for trying to capture foreign occupation forces.
Bucky McKeon's hypocrisy is so thick you can cut it with a knife.
I wonder if any of these scumbags has the cajones to meet the family of Sgt. Bergdahl, face-to-face, and explain to them that they preferred to have Bergdahl remain a prisoner of the Taliban. If Bergdahl had been the son of one of these aschlochs, would they still have the same feelings? Seriously doubt it. If Bergdahl had been the son of the half-governor of Alaska, would they still believe the same – would Ms. Palin also believe the same? Doubt it…
Thankfully both of these neanderthals are retiring – and the citizen taxpayers will continue to pay them well in their "retirement." Speaking of which, I believe a new Constitutional amendment is in order – curtail the "retirement" system for Congresscritters. Most of them are millionaires and do not need the further sacrifice of the taxpayers. I also believe in term limits but that is another story for another time.
I wonder if this trading of (most likely) innocent prisoners at held too long at Guantanamo for an American POW ties in with Benghazi – probably does for Rush Limbaugh crowd. (Same black President)
Here is my problem – the same people who criticize for "Benghazi" are outraged by what they call "disregard for our military" are the same people who criticize this POW deal for too much regard for our military. Only common point – same black President involved.
Bergdahl's capture and long captivity is an embarrassment to armchair warriors in Congress, as were the POW/MIA's left in Vietnam that John McCain made sure would never come home. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/30/646620/-… In GOP eyes, Bergdahl represents failures of vaunted US military power and prowess, failures in the intelligence/spying community, and worst of all, he might have some rather unpleasant things to say about US involvement in Afghanistan.
Glad he's out.
Notice how the language changes in a heart beat…..negotiate with terrorist= exchange…..Terrorist=Taliban. How embarrassing this must be for the Law makers for not using derogatory terms.
Wasn't Bergdahl AWOL at the time of his capture?