After facing down a rival French plan that included a UN authorization for military action against Syria, the tide seems to be turning decisively in favor of the Russian version, with Syrian President Bashar Assad and the Obama Administration both throwing support behind it. Hours later, Syria confirmed that it has now ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention obliging them to renounce use of the weapons and move toward their dismantlement.
Assad is said to have given an interview to Russian television announcing his intention to cede control of the arms to the international community. He will reportedly endorse the Russian plan, and say that it was Russia’s efforts, not US threats, that led to his decision.
Other Syrian officials, notably Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem, have already backed the plan, but this is the first time Assad will have directly commented on the matter.
The US is also going into Geneva talks with Russia with a more positive attitude today, saying the Russian plan is “doable but difficult.” While no one would dispute the idea that any chemical weapons disarmament is difficult (the United States has been trying to dispose of its own for almost 50 years now and still isn’t done), the big do-ability question of Russia’s plan had been whether the US would go along, since it is predicated on the US stopping their threats to attack Syria, at least for the time being.
At this point everybody on board with the deal, except of course the Syrian rebels, who don’t do diplomacy. Gen. Idriss, the head of the US-backed Free Syrian Army, says any disarmament plan must be rejected in favor of a US attack on Syria.
From the Syrian Foreign Minister: "We want a pledge that neither it (the U.S.) nor anyone else will launch an aggression against Syria," Jamil told The Associated Press in Damascus.
Shouldn't be a problem. It's the same pledge that Cuba got in 1962 when Russia agreed to remove weapons from Cuba, plus the US agreed to remove missiles aimed at Russia from Turkey.
Maybe the Syrian FM could also ask for a pledge that the US and any others stop supplying weapons to terrorists within Syria.
Good point. Not having WMD didn't work out too well for Hussein and Gaddafi…
I would think the hard part would be destroying the weapons, not ceding them to international control.
The US could also take this opportunity to cede its chemical weapons to international control. I'm sure this will be done, as the neanderthal Kerry challenged of Syria, "within a week."
The US, to prove its good faith, should start by stopping th flow of weapons to their mercenaries.
No government should trust American government under no circumstances unless is written and sealed by UN and signed by partyys involved, even then they have to be very very careful.