The vote was seen as virtually inevitable with France so loudly in support, but the UN Security Council made the war in Mali official today, unanimously endorsing an invasion of the northern two-thirds of the western African nation.
That region, known as Azawad, has been out of the Malian junta for months, since secessionists routed them in the region and were themselves displaced by Islamist factions, which hope to set up a Taliban-style religious state in Azawad.
Aid groups warn that a war in the impoverished desert region is going to have an enormous humanitarian cost, and even though the Malian “government” itself seems in crisis after the military forced the prime minister to resign at gunpoint last week, NATO nations seem confident that throwing massive numbers of African Union troops at the region is going to somehow bring “stability.”
Malians in the south, emboldened by the Western calls for war, have taken up arms themselves, vowing to help bring the northern region under the thumb of the southern government. This is likely to spark ethnic and religious clashes, however, as southern Mali and Azawad are two very different places with two very different populations.
WHOSE PAYING FOR THIS LITTLE ENGINEERING PROJECT…..???? Where is the MONEY coming from…. Are we seeing NATO using IT'S funds to PAY for another Neocon Project… ????? Because OUR American assessment is off budget, congress does NOT get to vote or have ANY say on any financial commitments or expenditures that "NATO" makes…. Is NATO becoming a MONEY LAUNDERING operation for the various world powers and BIG money (oil..??) interests…??? Need MONEY….???? Just dress a bunch of bums up in uniforms, send them out riding around in Jeeps or tanks…….. Send NATO a bill for the exercise… NATO seems to be a conduit for bribes and acquisitions or resoures… and it's NOT accountable to congress for either it's money or it's policies…
" Last year, the U.S. paid about $712 million, more than one-fifth the cost of keeping NATO afloat" http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum…
If the $712 million is accurate, it's easy to see why NATO is the vehicle of choice for Libya Syria and any and all attacks on anyone…. I don't find $712 million sounds right….. Something fishy….. Check out their site http://www.nato.int/ …. They sure aren't very forthcoming about the money part of their work…..