After several days of blisteringly fast gain, the Syrian Islamist rebel force led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) has forced Syrian Army forces to withdraw and has taken the major northern city of Aleppo. There has been video footage of rebel forces outside the police HQ in central Aleppo, as well as near the historic Aleppo Citadel, which is a UNESCO World Heritage site.
The offensive began late Wednesday, with HTS fighters pushing out of Idlib Province and into the Aleppo Province countryside. There was intense fighting both Thursday and Friday, with the HTS, backed by the Turkish-backed rebel factions, capturing scores of towns and villages, By late Friday they arrived at the outskirts of Aleppo, and they pushed into the city itself Saturday. Many hundreds of people have been killed, though exact figures are not available, and may not be for some time.
Russian and Syrian forces also launched airstrikes against targets in and around Aleppo. The reports are that at least 20 fighters along with 16 civilians have been killed.
The Syrian Army is talking about launching a counteroffensive to retake Aleppo, and reinforcements are said to be en route to the area. Both main highways leading to Aleppo have been blocked, however, so the trek into the area is likely to be difficult.
HTS and associated fighters appear to be in almost all neighborhoods of Aleppo now. They have taken the airport, and Kurdish YPG fighters are preparing to try to defend the Kurdish neighborhood of the city. Thousands of ethnic Kurds have reportedly fled east into Kurdish-controlled Syria in anticipation of the fight.
The fall of Aleppo is hugely significant, not just because of its size. The rebels had a history holding it in earlier parts of the Syrian Civil War, and the Syrian Army’s capture of the city in December 2016 was seen as a major turning point. The civil war never really ended though, and now the city seems to once again be in play for the rebels.
But fighting in Aleppo is unlikely to be the end of the offensive. Already it’s being reported that some of the rebel fighters are moving south from the Aleppo Province toward the city of Hama. Hama would be the second major city in the path of the offensive, and if it fell, that would open up pushes toward Homs and even the capital of Damascus.
Though the Syrian Army has vowed to reverse the course after recent losses, they have issued a statement trying to blame Israel for the HTS push. The statement insisted the Army was effectively “fighting the military arm of the Israeli enemy, falsely labeled as the ‘Syrian revolution.’” They added that HTS was backed by “thousands of foreign militants” and had heavy weapons and drones. They reportedly got the drones from Ukraine. The statement concluded with the declaration “you are either with the Syrian Arab Army or with Israel.”
The Syrian Army isn’t the only one pointing the finger at Israel. Syrian Foreign Minister Bassam Sabbagh said on Friday that the HTS offensive served the interest of Israeli occupation forces. He mentioned an “obvious connection” between recent Israeli strikes on Syria and the rebel push.
He’s not the only one making that connection. Former US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford pointed to recent Israeli airstrikes on Syria as well as the air war against Hezbollah, as providing HTS an “opportunity to advance.”
Other than Israel, the Kurdish YPG is pointing the finger at Turkey, saying they were behind the HTS offensive. Indeed, Turkish-backed rebels have participated heavily in the offensive on multiple fronts.
HTS formed in early 2017 as a merger of several Islamist militant groups, centering initially around fighting Jabhat al-Nusra but ultimately merging with them as well. Jabhat al-Nusra was effectively the Syrian wing of al-Qaeda, though they broke with them publicly in 2016. Despite that, HTS maintains much of the underlying rhetoric of al-Qaeda.
Publicly, HTS and their leader Abu Mohammad al-Julani has tried to disavow al-Qaeda and ISIS and has courted favor with the US. He has styled the civilian body in HTS-dominated Idlib the Syrian Salvation Government. It has long been suspected that this rebranding was more about trying to turn Syrian Sunni Islamist factions into a more palatable partner for Western involvement in the region than any major ideological differences with the international jihadists.
It has had some success in that regard. In 2018, the Trump Administration acknowledged publicly that they were no longer directly targeting Julani. Though HTS-affiliated forces have shot at US troops in Syria from time to time, so it’s not correct to call them allies, as such, it is fair to say they have common interests in regime change.
The West has a history of backing some of the more local Sunni Islamist groups in the Syrian Civil War. Indeed, the HTS ties with Ukraine’s government underscores that many see them as a practical partner in their respective regional wars. This is doubtless a growing concern for Syria’s government, which had settled into a more or less stable territorial position in recent years.
Everyone needs to keep their noses in their own business. All else should be done at the UNSC….
the un needs to be stronger
We wrote the charter for the UN. There may have been a purpose to not write in intervention to stop genocides. And, we wrote in that any one country can overrule the majority. Isn't that nice. Hmm.
Its quite broken.
The charter was written by several countries not just the USA.
Looks like the plot to carve up Syria continues after a long pause. Turkey wants northern Syria, Israel wants the south, and the USA wants a puppet Kurdish state with its non-Arab Kurd merc army in the east. This had almost succeeded until the Russians intervened in 2015. But most of the Russians and their aircraft returned to fight in Ukraine so now is a good time to restart the effort. It will be easier for Israel to then attack Lebanon from the east after their failed effort to push up fortified and mountainous southern Syria.
Excellent, excellent! Just what we all need!
Truth!
Russia needs to end the conflict in Ukraine. Quickly. Decisively.
Iran needs that bomb, and stop messing around. ASAP.
Hezbollah needs to fire off thousands of rockets at Tel Aviv, and the base at Cyprus. ASAP.
How bizarre. Russian, Iran, and its puppet Hezbollah are anti-Western entities. Why would you want Iran to have nuclear weapons? Why do you want a terrorist group to murder thousands of civilians?
vip1730 wants to live long enough to see a nuclear war in the middle east.
Well, he is advocating the slaughter of thousands of civilians on a thread about the problem of civilian deaths…
If "Alexander" is drinking a glass of water, is "Tim Burns" able to sing the Israeli national anthem?
On a site with mob-like group thinking, you object to people who disagree?
Perhaps if you had any facts to support your positions, you would offer those, instead of childish personal attacks, the sign of a failed argument.
Wow, you sure like to get people killed. By the way, how is the Hezbollah attacking chlorine plants working out?
This is the way Israel has always acted! October 7 was spun in a way by the media/Israel to help "justify" massive war crimes by Israel. Israel isn't the only one to have "a right to self-defense". In fact, international law dictates that an "occupier does NOT have a right to self-defense"! Every cent, every weapon that the USA gives to Israel runs counter to the "freedom and democracy" pledge by the USA Constitution! Every USA "leader" who enables Israeli war crimes is a TRAITOR to the American way!
Well, you'll be able to continue this at your Anti-Imperialism class at Columbia or Harvard. But sadly, here in the real world, your comments fall flat.
1. Israel left Gaza in 2006; it (Gaza) is currently illegally occupied by Hamas, which is not a legal or recognized government (before you say, "they won elections!" – find the facts).
2. To end the war Hamas started, all they need to do is surrender, release hostages, and renounce violence. They could have done this at anytime, but they choose to continue the war and the suffering.
3. There is no "international law" saying anyone has no right to self-defense. Also, Gaza and the West Bank are not "occupied;" they are disputed.
4. Where does "freedom and democracy" appear in the Constitution, and why does the support for an important US ally violate the Constitution?
In fact, under US law, Israel is classified as a "major non-NATO ally," which obligates the United States government to offer certain protections and benefits. No one has ever challenged that status as non-constitutional, but you are free to bring it to the Supreme Court, if you wish.
5. Following the law and protecting US allies makes US leaders into traitors? Actually, the opposite is true; attacking or failing to protect US allies hurts American interests.
"This had almost succeeded until the Russians intervened in 2015." I remember that. That was right around the time Putin became "the new Hitler" if I recall.
War is hell
Who would want such wanton suffering?
God bless everyone for peace
Beautifully stated! Bravit!
Thank you
I like the sunflower on your profile image
I have some sunflowers in my garden
“Inch by inch and row by row! Gonna make my garden grow! All I need is a rake and a hoe, till the rain comes tumbling down!”
it rains quite often during winter in Polska
it shall be little wait
i mean the sunflowers are in a greenhouse but y'know….
This is what happens when Putin and Assad kicked the can down the road and failed to retake Idlib province. I always considered that a major mistake. The same with allowing the US to take the eastern portion, although there at least avoidance of engaging the US which has more resources in the area probably was prudent.
I wonder if Putin has learned his lesson – or will he do the same stupid shit in Ukraine?
putin is stupid
i wager the latter
Richard Steven Hack
Krzysztóf w Łódź
All countries, as with individual human beings, have self interest, which manifests in a country's national self interest.
I submit Russia has minimal self interest in Syria. Why? self interest is grounded on what or how that person, what or how that country (Syria) can benefit the person or country. (Russia). Yes, and what or how that person, what or how that country (Russia ) can benefit the person or country (Syria).
In a word, reciprocity.
Syria can and does offer Russia a low grade, substandard port and low grade, substandard air base. Yes, Syria can and does offer a buffer from United States hegemony. Although Syria does not border Russia, it does border Iran which borders Russia. And, yes, Syria does offer political support for Russia.
Russia is the largest landmass country on the planet, which has a multitude of ethnic, religious, cultural, and language differences. Russia's political, economic, financial, monetary, military and governance has experienced great changes, stresses and strains in the not too distant past and presently.
Accordingly, Russia does not have unlimited resources to support and aid less developed and dependent countries, like Syria.
Russia presently works tirelessly to interact and connect with China. Why? Because Russia and China have a tremendous, almost unlimited, number common and mutual self interests, unlike Syria.
“War is a matter not so much of arms as of money.”
― Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War
Thucydides,
460 B.C.E. – 400 B.C.E.
“Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”
― Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War
I am not anti-Syria or anti-Syrians.
I am a Syrian born and raised in the United States.
I, however, work to see, understand and act with a "realist's" mind set.
dennis hanna
This isn’t stupidity. It’s by design. Russia could’ve fortified Syria a long time ago and eliminated all threats. But Russia likes Syria to be dependent on them so they don’t get independent ideas they don’t like.
Trusting Erdogan the snake is extremely dangerous. Putin has flirted too much with far right forces like Erdogan, Israel or even the Ukranian nazis until 2022. Maybe the Communists should take over Russia again?
potential cu d'etat in syria?
ISIS style operation rather. They are unlikely to take over the country but very dangerous anyhow.
We gave birth to Al-queda, which gave birth to ISIS, which is a tool for us and Israel.
It's undergoing, whether it will succeed is a different story.
But Putin will have to redirect forces from Ukraine to hold the opposition back. Very difficult spot for him.
The Best and Brightest managers of the US Empire are throwing the kitchen sink at the forces arrayed against it. And this has nothing to do with Republican or Democratic, but it has everything to do with preserving the New World Order of neoliberal free-market (unregulated) capitalism.
I think we can expect all sorts of fireworks like what is now displayed in Syria, as the US and its Western allies/surrogates/satraps ignite (or re-ignite) regional conflicts across the Middle East / Western Asia and elsewhere.
We see now another flare-up of sub-violent confrontation in Georgia; renewed violent conflict in Syria; Israeli aggression in Lebanon; NATO escalating missile power in the Ukraine war; increased activity by alleged 'freedom fighters' in Myanmar; and similar incidents in Asia and elsewhere.
All of which is portrayed in the mainstream news media as if there were no connection between them. And indeed it is difficult to prove such connections, but the overall pattern of increased violence puts me in mind of a large, powerful beast, wounded and cornered and lashing out.
I pray that we can get all through this period without a world war. And I am not religious in the usual ways.
The USA is certainly fighting a broad range imperial war (mostly by proxy) in the Ukraine-Yemen arc. I wouldn't call it "preserving capitalism" however, because their rivals are also capitalist, China included, but preserving or consolidating the US Empire.
Per Lenin 1916, monopolistic capitalism (and it is indeed monopolistic in the US Empire today) leads to Imperialism (which is the name of the game of global capitalist mafiosi fighting each other in terms of nations, empires and blocs for the markets and resources of the world) and this leads to war.
Touché ole!
Your analysis is one-sided, as your ignore all the attempts by non-Anglo-American allies to overturn the post-war geopolitical balance. After all, Russia did not need to attack Ukraine; Hamas/Hezbollah/Iran did not need to attack Israel; China does not need to threaten Taiwan, the Philippines, and Australia; North Korea does not need to threaten South Korea, Japan, and the US.
A lot of countries want to take advantage of China's economic (and military) rise to get a bigger piece of the pie, especially after watching the US/EU run uncontrolled after the fall of the Soviet Union. But of course the West will try to hold the line, especially as China prefers economic, not military, approaches. For now.
A lot of this looks one-sided to me. Maybe you could explain some of these generalizations such as Russia did not need to attack Ukraine. . . .
No need to explain. Russia did not need to attack Chechnya, Georgia, and now Ukraine.
Zero justification.
Perhaps, you should explain why it should, and don't give us the Neo nazi BS.
Russia engaged in a war of aggression, not defense, so by definition it was not justified, according to international law. This was reflected in the UN vote, in which nearly every nation on the earth demanded the immediate withdrawal of Russian forces.
https://press.un.org/en/2022/ga12407.doc.htm
The measure was adopted by a vote of 141 in favor with 5 against (Belarus, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Eritrea, Russian Federation, and Syria).
Yes they did.
Yes they did.
They didn't threaten Taiwan.
They didn't threaten these folks either.
You have this backwards: It's the US that threatens North Korea not the other way around, and Japan and South Korea follow the US lead … though with a minimum of enthusiasm.
You have real issues with recognizing the difference between US imperial propaganda and reality. Try to do better
1. Russia launched a war of aggression, not defense, against a peaceful neighbor, in violation of all international law. That is why nearly every nation supported the UN resolution demanding Russia immediately end their illegal war.
"General Assembly Overwhelmingly Adopts Resolution Demanding Russian Federation Immediately End Illegal Use of Force in Ukraine, Withdraw All Troops"
https://press.un.org/en/2022/ga12407.doc.htm
2. Hamas is not even a legal government, as the legal government in Gaza is the Palestinian Authority, but they took over Gaza in a violent coup and illegally occupy Gaza, where they have ruled with torture and murder of Gazans. However, they could have peacefully coexisted with Israel but they chose to spend the billions of dollars they received in aid to murder Israeli civilians (and others in Israel from a dozen nations).
3. Iran can also choose peace but prefers war, in Israel (which they have attacked) and with their proxies, such as the Houthis and Hezbollah.
You offer no support for your statements, which are profoundly uninformed. Your argument is "because I said so," which isn't worth responding to.
However, China clearly threatens Taiwan, as they make regular and clear threats to the island nation.
This article is entitled, "China repeatedly threatens to invade Taiwan," which would suggest that China repeatedly threatens to invade Taiwan.
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/18/nx-s1-5147096/china-repeatedly-threatens-to-invade-taiwan-what-would-an-invasion-look-like
Come on Alexander make arguments that are serious, or no one will respect you.
1. Russia is not a good guy. It's like any other state with interests. However, you don't encroach NARO up to its border and expect it to capitulate. We went through this history many times. The US lied to Russia about expanding NATO. Russia's attack could be legitimate although the conduct of thewar can be in violations of the laws of war.
2. The Hamas argument is not even a serious one. Hamas is a response to israeli occupation and brutality. And you're all wrong about the coup nonsense. Hamas one the elections. Fatah and the PA couldn't stomach the defeat so they prevented Hamas from governing. Hamas just went in to scare them and the PA fell like a deck of cards. Tell the truth even if it's against you.
3. The truth is Iran hasn't offensively attacked any country in about a century. Look at a map of US bases surrounding Iran for the last 4 decades. All fpor Israel's benefit. Of course they will defend themselves. Anyway Israel has been assassinating and meddling in Iran since the revolution.
4. I agree that China threatens Taiwan but its playing it smart. Taiwan is in direct proximity to China and its influence. Yet China is being patient. The nonsense is US intervention.
5. As for Korea. Why the hell are we in the demilitarized zone for 7 decades. We need to get the hell out of there ASAP.
@clever_dog:disqus@disqus_KAfPEpsMYs:disqus@disqus_dw0PWv6cnf:disqus@jeff_davis:disqus
Utter nonsense completely disconnected from reality and not worthy of any kind of detailed rebuttal. But just the same, I will waste a little bit of my time on you … but not much.
Everything you stay here is western propaganda, and like the offerings of the western media, total junk. I point the reader's attention to that last comment about China, which comes from NPR, a completely corrupted and discredited publicly-funded interagency “chat bot”. That's “interagency chat bot” as in intelligence community propaganda tool.
You write:
Again, this might as well be a CIA talking point. The US, having been conquered by the "Neocons" — Supremacist Jew!sh Russia-haters — overthrew the Ukrainian government, as part of their Zio-Supremacist/NATO expansionist plan to destroy Russia, and installed their puppet, who directed the Nazis of western Ukraine to attack the Russians of eastern Ukraine. Putin, as head of Russia, would have nothing to do with the attacks on Russians in Ukraine or the threat to the Russian nation, and failing a diplomatic resolution, embarked on the necessary military operation to thwart the Zio-Supremacist plan — ridiculous, delusional, psychopathic plan — for world domination. (cf, The Wolfowitz Doctrine)
And as to your comment about “peaceful neighbor”, the Ukro-Nazis are as monstrous as Genghis Khan. As little shitstain Zelinsky is perfectly happy to fill his pockets with stolen billions while endlessly killing young Christian Slavic Ukrainian men. A win win "twofer" for someone of his ethnicity. (I'm not allowed to say the ethnicity, lest my post be “moderated”.)
Your comments about Hamas and Iran are just Zio-stupid lying Hasbara… though saying “lying Hasbara” is unavoidably redundant.
I assume there will be no stopping you from expressing your brain-damaged non-reality. But your fate here on anti-war dot calm will likely follow the same trajectory of those like you who have come before. You'll persist in your nonsense, be roundly ridiculed for it, and then slink away to websites more aligned with your particular brand of non-reality.
Endeavor to persevere.
Yes they did.
Yes they did.
They didn't threaten Taiwan.
They didn't threaten these folks either.
You have this backwards: It's the US that threatens North Korea not the other way around, and Japan and South Korea follow the US lead … though with a minimum of enthusiasm.
You have real issues with recognizing the difference between US imperial propaganda and reality. Try to do better
It's doubtful Harry Truman was religious. Joe Biden isn't.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is a devout Orthodox Christian. That doesn't mean he won't launch a nuclear strike that's intended to save Russian lives.
The 2013-2014 Maidan Revolution might have been the diplomatic/military inflection event pointing to the existential denouement between Washington and Russia. Even Washington had an inkling. The SMO has confirmed this. The first Oreshnik strike has cemented that reality.
Brian Berletic explains the history of the current US proxy war in #Syria and compares it to #Ukraine in hi latest:
US Proxy War with Russia in Ukraine Extends to Syria
His "irrefutable" is very convincing in the analysis. Timing of this Syrian resurgence is curiously convenient to what looks like a weakening re fighting for Gaza including the hesitation of Iran. What further expansion might be in the planning?What a total weasel Erdogan shows as with this report, and Trump appears to be completely on board with deepstate plotting as with the freeze/buffer zone idea in Ukraine.
Erdogan is a jackal.
Putin is a war criminal.
Countries act in their own self-interests, not yours. So, it makes perfect sense.
Russia and Iran thought they were more powerful than they were; Russia went into Ukraine, expecting an easy victory; instead, he found a brutal war of attrition. Iran thought they had Israel surrounded until Hamas overplayed their hand.
As for the earlier comment about paper-tiger Hezbollah launching missiles – before you can press the button, you need fingers (and eyes). And leaders.
What earlier comment was that? What is it that makes perfect sense?
What about the reported Kurdish replacement of the retreating Syrian Army in central Aleppo?
What about Iran rushing to diplomate with Turkey (backer of the "rebels")?
In any case the operation seems very well planned and reminiscent of other operations in which secularist military was overwhelmed by betrayals: the DAESH takeover of parts of Iraq in 2014 and also the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan after US sudden retreat in 2020. Conspiracy and bribery are at play, no doubt.
A big Hodge podge of interest groups, what happened to the Salafists and the CIA, on which side are they meddling?
The HTS are Salafists of course. Salafism is an ideology similar to Christo-Fascism or Zionism but in Muslim variant. Fascists in other words but with a religious emphasis not all variants of Fascism have.
IMO the CIA is behind Turkey and the HTS attack. I have no proof but seems very likely. The Kurds are “allied” to the USA because they had no other option for a “protector” so they accepted in 2016, when Obama and Erdogan had a major fallout and Gral. Allen (US military chief in the region) was fired. This alliance proved decisive in the subsequent anti-ISIS coalition, in which the Kurds (and allies, not everybody is Kurdish in the multiethnic and confederative NSF) soundly defeated the DAESH monster (Syria and Russia also played a part but smaller, less decisive, Tuyrkey complied but stayed in the sidelines and recycled many ISIS militants into the Al Nusra Front, which would soon become part of Al Qaeda and is now the HTS core).
However later, with Trump in the imperial throne, Turkey became again very aggressive and, along with their militant goons, captured and genocided Afrin, the westernmost canton of the NSF, where not just the native Kurds but also many many war refugees lived. At that point both Russia and the USA refused to help the NSF and the only aid came from Syria-Damascus, which did not directly intervene but allowed the Kurdish+ militias to transit their territory.
Later Turkey intervened again, occupying an area in Rojava itself and forcing a large demilitarized zone at the border. Again the USA did nothing but force the NSF’s hand. And again the cooperation with Damascus proved worthy when these accepted to take over Manbij, effectively dissuading Turkey from conquering it.
I doubt that the instable and antinatural USA-NSF alliance will withstand another Trump mandate, really, as he has proven to yield to Turkey and the Salafists all the time.
Lots of info, much appreciated. With the little I know about the region I know a little about religious and national issues and the problem with borders drawn by the British colonial power and the USA without any consideration for the people who lived there and who owned the land.
As I recall, the Salafists, orthodox Sunnis, demonstrated against Assad and the CIA did the usual, they used the Salafists to cause more social unrest against Assad for a regime change, but Russia did support Assad, how the US still managed to control the oil region, I have no idea. But as Trump said, they are there to steal the oil. Trump does spill the beans sometimes.
What is “the oil region”? If you mean the illegal military base of An Tanf or Al Tanf: they just invaded from Iraq (it’s a border outpost, incidentally rich in oil). If you mean the North Syria Federation led by the communist, democratic, confederalist and feminist Kurdish forces YPG-YPG, they were self-organized in defense against Turkey-supported fascists, notably but not only ISIS (of terrible memory) and they were on their own until the confusing 2016 military coup attempt in Turkey, which Erdogan blamed on the USA. Then Obama fired Gral. Allen, who had been leading the regional US agitation in the last many years, and forged an anti-ISIS coalition with everyone but Turkey. It was then when the NSF and the USA became allied and the result was that the NSF destroyed ISIS for good, because they are more motivated than other forces to fight against fascism and patriarchism, especially the women of the YPJ, who often fight much determinedly than the YPG (men) because they have much more to lose if the fascists win. I don’t think that the USA “controls” the NSF oilfieds: recently one such oilfield near Raqqa was attacked by ISIS militants and the videos showed people complaining that there is no military whatsoever over there and the the reffinery served the local community.
Turkey has indirect control of another oil-rich region in North Iraq via the treacherous and mafioso KDP, led by the Barzani clan. Those are right wingers and have no relation other than hostility with the rest of Kurdish forces. They serve Turkey and the USA and they export oil to Israel via Turkey.
I mean the oil and other mineral rich region where three continents meet. Israel is on the Asian continent with a European dominated population and culture. So many cultures, races and religions and histories, enough to keep the ME at a boiling point in the best of times.
Too generic.
That's how the freezing of the front line ends.
8 years ago Syrian army was victorious. Then they decided to freeze the military activity. While Turks, Americans and Wahhabi terrorists were busy preparing themselves for revanche, Syrian army plunged in corruption. Maybe Assad is a good man but he is weak as the leader of the government. And of course Israel also contributed in this success by keeping Hezbollah engaged in defense of Lebanon.
In this connection, Minsk Agreements 2015 also worth of mentioning. The idea was to stop the bloodshed. 7 years later it started again and the bloodshed now is on much greater scale.
"Assad is a good man " LOL.
What else can you expect from a 'religious' dictator cheerleader?
Remember when obama called the Islamist Rebels, JV?
Remember when Insane John McCain went to Syria to meet with Islamist Rebels and unbeknownst to Insane McCain there were terrorists in the PR photo who the US wanted dead?
How long before this current crop of CIA proxies turn on American interests?
The rapid takeover of Aleppo by HTS-led forces marks a significant escalation in the Syrian conflict, with devastating consequences for civilians caught in the crossfire.
https://www.legalaims.com/important-dates-of-the-arms-act-1959/
https://www.legalaims.com/the-arms-act-1959/
https://www.legalaims.com/origins-and-evolution-of-firearm-legislation-in-india-the-arms-act/
Great tune. So simple.
Manipulation through twisting language. Instead of writing that they blame Israel, Ditz says they are "trying to blame Israel". That implies that their claim isn't true.
And calling them "rebels" is also false when they come from Iraq and central Asia.
They are armed with drones by Ukraine, trained by Ukrainians in their use. Ukraine has offered the Islamists drones in exchange for them sending soldiers to fight in Zelensky's war against Donbass. They attack Syria right when Israel failed to take Lebanon, so the US-Israel axis wants to cut off Iran's aid to the Lebanese resistance that goes through Syria. This is all about Israel.
The Islamists are also being supplied from NATO member Turkey, with Erdogan pretending to oppose the Gaza holocaust while he has always kept up the trade with Israel.
And Israel and the US are now using Erdogan to help do their dirty work.
I've heard several people with the credentials state what has now become obvious to me: Turkey is no one's ally – or friend.
Turkey balances duplicity.
A lot of this discussion overlooks key points that need to be examined to actually open the way to a discussion on solutions instead of simplistic theories.
1. It is the people of Syria that deserve freedom from foreign intervention (Majority Sunni)
2. The Assad regime is corrupt and has long oppressed the people of Syria
3. Contextualizing Syria from the "nation state" paradigm is faulty. Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Palestine is one area within the Middle East known as bilad ash shaam.
4. Notwithstanding ISIS/alqaeda, this naive, stupid and ill advised contempt for Sunni "Islamists" prevents understanding the reality and contributing to a solution.
Let's talk about all the proxies being used, including future ones, new fronts emerging, etc. Commenters generally imo understand the people are abused and victimized by rotten leaders.
I agree there are a lot of rotten leaders to go around. On occasion good leaders emerge from the chaos.
They should be called US empire proxies. Acting as proxies of empire never results in some kind of fair or legitimate outcome, no matter religion, ethnicity or cause.
The US replaces corrupt with infinitely more corrupt leadership to be tightly controlled or they salt the earth so nothing of any good can grow, *see Libya.
According to many Russian supporters, the Syrian Army is doing just fine while Russia is indiscriminately bombing Aleppo with Hail Mary strikes aimed at nothing just to safe face.
Russia couldn't protect Armenia and lost its foothold there, if the opposition continues gaining ground, Putin will be in a very tough position.
Imagine countries praising a terrorist state for it's actions, because it's better than acknowledging the compliment to a real state as in Syria since it has links with Russia
Why keeping your readers in the dark by designating:
{Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)}
instead of its real translation:
LEVANT's Regulatory/Liberation Authority
هيئة تحرير الشام
All of this was done only to further the genocide of the Palestinian people, by cutting them off from any help.
The "rebels" are in the pay of the US, used for the service of Israel.
Why would they do this? Deluded. Fools.