Gaza’s Health Ministry said Tuesday that US-backed Israeli attacks killed at least 58 Palestinians and wounded 213 over the previous 24-hour period as Israeli strikes continued to pound targets across the besieged territory.
The Health Ministry’s numbers account for dead and wounded Palestinians brought to hospitals and morgues. “There are still a number of victims under the rubble and on the streets, and ambulance and civil defense crews cannot reach them,” the ministry wrote on Telegram.
Israeli attacks included a strike on a home in Deir el-Balah in central Gaza, which killed at least 11 Palestinians, including five children. Another strike on a separate home in Deir al-Balah killed four people. Another Israeli attack in the northern city of Beit Lahia flattened a home and killed a family of seven.
The Health Ministry said that since Israel restarted its genocidal war on March 18, at least 1,149 Palestinians have been killed, and 3,647 have been wounded.
The US-backed assault has had an enormous toll on children. The Health Ministry said on Monday that at least 505 children had been killed by Israeli attacks since March 18, accounting for 36.3% of the deaths. Another 1,249 children have been wounded as of Monday.
Besides the massive airstrikes and shelling, the Israeli military has also expanded its ground offensive and now controls more than 50% of the Palestinian territory. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made clear that his long-term goal is a full Israeli military occupation and the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population.
It is all on Hamas who initiated this mess and could have stopped it at any point in the last 18 months by laying down their arms and releasing all the hostages. It is Israel's job to see than Hamas can never again commit mass murder in Israel. Unless they follow another mad man—– Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh: "We love death like our enemies love life! We love Martyrdom."
Sourcing is always of benefit to those who are paying attention.
Hamas Charter (Preamble) 1988– "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it."
Obliterate: to remove from existence : destroy utterly all trace, indication, or significance of.
Hamas has been very honest about their ambition.
All Israel's wars were initiated by Zionist terrorism.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/30db9e5c57f6d47687522a793c819fcceedb0637d5b3fdcb1988e529db6772f5.jpg
https://www.trackaipac.com/trump
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8a6de3e202ada8be4aa937bb3e39619fd44b8b2d534bdb7bc04218e7f96d17fe.jpg
Hamas decided their own future with their 1988 Charter calling for the "obliteration" of Israel. — Source: Hamas Charter (Preamble)
Is there some reason why you’re focused on a past Hamas charter rather than the current Hamas charter? Is it possible that just maybe there are differences between the two?
When I pay my rent, I have to pay the amount listed in the current lease, not a past lease.
Hamas did not change their ambition because they re-worded it. You can read all the current statements by Hamas spokesmen in recent years. They only have one ambition and they are very honest about it.
If they haven’t changed their ambition, why do you insist on using an obsolete charter instead of the current one to describe that ambition?
If I get pulled over by a cop for speeding, he doesn’t say “yes, I know the sign says the speed limit is 55 miles per hour, but back in 1988 it said something else.”
To let the readers know how long they have stated this ambition.
Your false analogy does not apply to Hamas.
In 2017, a revised Hamas Charter included three departures from the 1988 manifesto. The new document practically replaced the founding charter of 1988.
The 2017 covenant separates the struggle against Zionism from general antisemitism, stating Hamas fights Zionists, not for their Jewishness but because of their "illegal" project:
Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine.
The 2017 Charter shows a readiness on the part of Hamas to accept a two-state solution along the 1967 borders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Hamas_charter
On the other hand, war criminal Netanyahu only has one objective. He has decided to abandon any ceasefire deal and resume his genocidal agenda. In fact, it's the fascist Israelis calling for the "total annihilation" of Palestine.
The 1977 Likud party manifeso states: "between Jordan and the Sea there will only be Israeli sovereignty."
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/75adab353a0a6234c8e59dd49cf27eb45b976d6078392058ee08d4310d1f7512.png
Nice propaganda posters!
Since when did a newspaper clipping from 1946 become a propaganda poster? Moron.
King David Hotel bombing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing
Go back to school.
Here you go pipsqueak.
In the past two weeks Israel has carried out a "Kafr Qana" nearly every day in the Gaza Strip, and no one is calling for it to stop. The Kafr Qana nightmare has evaporated. There is no longer any need to be make sure not to kill dozens of innocent civilians. No one cares. The IDF spokesperson no longer needs to lie, the prime minister no longer needs to be sorry. The world and Israel's conscience have melted away.
https://archive.is/vvgFZ
Ah, some minds are still working!….
Is this lunacy part of advancing civilization?
Israeli Soldiers Expose War Crimes in Gaza ‘Death Zone’
April 9, 2025
IDF soldiers admit to committing war crimes in Gaza, with one officer revealing they not only kill military-age men, “we’re killing their wives, their children, their cats, their dogs …[and] pissing on their graves.”
https://consortiumnews.com/2025/04/09/israeli-soldiers-expose-war-crimes-in-gaza-death-zone/
Believe me those soldiers will not be speaking out about this much longer.
Hamas could have put a stop to this at any point in the last 18 months by simply laying down their arms and releasing all the hostages. Instead they continue to state that there will be more October 7's, leaving Israel with no choice but to continue until the last Hamas terrorist is either dead or lays down his arms, followed by terms of surrenders.
Do you know what Hamas's terms of surrender are for the Israelis? Please give an honest and academic response.
Go away and share your polluted views with someone else! Unbelievable! Hamas and the Palestinians have put up with Israeli "October 7's" for over 70 years, so don't give us your perverted apologies for a WAR CRIMINAL nation! You have blood on your opinion!
You have ignorance on your opinion. Palestinian Arabs had an offer to build an independent state with the 1947 UN Partition Resolution, and they would be celebrating 77 years of independent statehood today with pre-1967 borders. However, collective Arab Countries chose war instead and they lost. They chose war several more times and they lost. If you risk everything to gain it all , and when you lose, you don't get go back to the status quo each time.
The massacres of Palestinians and the driving of Palestinians from their homes began prior to the Arab invasion.
The invasion was an effort to protect the Palestinians from Zionist war criminals.
Unfortunately the Zionist war criminals won that war and the next 2 wars in 1956 & 1967, both of which were started by Israel.
10 March 1948, [2 months BEFORE the Arab invasions] a group of eleven men, veteran
Zionist leaders together with young military Jewish officers, put the final touches on a plan
for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.
That same evening, military orders were dispatched to units on the ground to prepare for the systematic expulsion of Palestinians from vast areas of the country.
The orders came with a detailed description of the methods to be used to
forcibly evict the people
large-scale intimidation;
laying siege to and bombarding villages
and population centers;
setting fire to homes, properties, and goods;
expelling residents;
demolishing homes;
and, finally, planting mines in the rubble to prevent the expelledinhabitants from returning.
Each unit was issued its own list of villages and neighborhoods
to target in keeping with the master plan. Code-named Plan D (Dalet in Hebrew), this was the fourth and final version of vaguer plans outlining the fate that was in store for the native population of Palestine.
The previous three plans had articulated only obscurely how the Zionist leadership intended to deal with the presence of so many Palestinians on the land the Jewish national movement wanted for itself. This fourth and last blueprint spelled it out clearly and unambiguously: the Palestinians had to go.
The plan, which covered both the rural and urban areas of Palestine, was the inevitable result both of Zionism’s ideological drive for an exclusively Jewish presence in Palestine and
a response to developments on the ground following the British decision in February 1947 to end its Mandate over the country and turn the problem over to the United Nations.
Clashes with local Palestinian militias, especially after the UN partition resolution of November 1947, provided the perfect context and pretext for implementing the ideological
vision of an ethnically cleansed Palestine.
Once the plan was finalized, it took six months to complete the mission. When it was over, more than half of Palestine’s native population, over 750,000 people, had been uprooted, 531 villages had been destroyed, and 11 urban neighborhoods had been emptied of their inhabitants.
The plan decided upon on 10 March 1948, and above all its systematic
implementation in the following months, was a clear case of what is now known as an ethnic cleansing operation"
https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/jps/vol36-141/vol36-141_b.pdf
If Sunday's horrific bloodbath in the current phase of the Gaza war does not stop Israel; if the killing of a Rafah medical team fails to stop it, what could stop it? Nothing. Israel can carry out as many massacres as it likes. And apparently, it would like quite a lot of them.
In the opening strike of the renewed warfare in Gaza, Israel killed 436 civilians, among them 183 children and 94 women. Kafr Qana four times over and then some.
https://archive.is/vvgFZ
Only Hamas can stop it, but they love their martyrdom. Lay down your arms and release the hostages, simple!
Hamas invited Israel into Gaza on Oct 7th for a reason. They made their statement, why wait until Israel has to turn Gaza into a parking lot???
Is the Israeli regime willing to release its hostages too, or does that just go one way?
They have prisoners, some are terrorists, some with blood on their hand, some are facilitators of the terrorism, some were just throwing rocks at the authorities. Try throwing rocks at the authorities in an Islamic Country and see how long you will live.
A hostage is a person captured and held by another party, to force the other party to comply with demands.
“A hostage is a person captured and held by another party, to force the other party to comply with demands.”
And Israel has been caging Palestinians and then trading them — that is, using them as hostages — for decades.
No, the demand for Hamas prisoners are coming from Hamas in return for prisoners, many with blood on their hands.
You can play your words games all you want but if Hamas does not surrender, Israel will have to stay on their backs while the good people of Gaza continue to live in grief and chaos.
It’s not just Hamas that the Israeli regime has traded Palestinian hostages to. It did so at least as early as 1968 (trading 165 Palestinian hostages for 12 Israeli hostages taken in an El Al hijacking). In 1970, the Israeli regime traded a Palestinian hostage to Fatah for an Israeli hostage. In 1975, the Israeli regime traded 20 Palestinian hostages to the Egyptian regime for fthe bodies of two Lehi fighters who’d been hanged for an assassination in 1945. In 1978, the Israeli regime traded 76 Palestinian hostages to the PFLP-GC in return for an IDF soldier.
All of those exchanges happened years before Hamas even existed. The Israeli regime stockpiles Palestinian hostages and trades them as a matter of policy.
Israel could stop it but choose no to. They have chosen to be more terroristic than those that are "designated terrorists". And whether Hamas surrenders or continues on doesn't change that fact.
Yes, and Israel then acted like brutal savages from Oct 7th to the present. Outdoing anything the "designated terrorists" could even have dreamed of doing. I don't understand why you continue to blame Hamas for that. Israel didn't have to turn Gaza into a parking lot, they chose to turn Gaza into a parking lot.
Will you please study some history going back to 1948 and even before when the Zionists planned the establishment of Israel to get a foothold into the Middle East. Teh Zionists have never stopped killing, raping, stealing property ever since then. Hamas is in a defense position not to be slaughtered altogether.
In 1947, the UN offered two stateless people an opportunity to build two independent nations. One group chose to build a nation, and five Arab Countries chose war and they lost.
Israel declared statehood in 1948, and in 1949 became member State at the United Nations. Palestinian Arabs were then occupied by Egypt in Gaza and Jordan in the West Bank for the next 20 years until they decided to go to war with Israel again and they lost again.
For twenty years there were no Israeli settlements in the West Bank or Gaza, and yet Israel was a constant target. So it was never really about settlements. Arab Countries just did not want a non-Muslim country in the Middle East.
“Israel declared statehood in 1948, and in 1949 became member State at the United Nations, agreeing to the UNR 181 borders as a condition of that membership.”
Fixed, no charge.
The refusal by the Arab population of the mandate territory to accept UN Partition Resolution 181 (1947) demonstrated that Palestinian Arabs were not interested in establishing their own state if it meant allowing the existence of a Jewish state.
This opposition to acknowledging the right of a Jewish state to exist still lies at the core of the conflict 77 years later.
Arab disagreement with the establishment of a Jewish state per UNR 181 doesn’t magically cancel out the fact that Israel was established on, and its membership in the UN was continent on, Israeli acceptance of UNR 181.
Let’s say I own two houses next to each other. I offer to rent them, one to you and the other to someone you don’t like, for $1,000 per month each.
You accept. The person you don’t like doesn’t accept.
That doesn’t mean you don’t have to pay your damn rent.
Arab disagreement with the establishment of a Jewish state per UNR 181 doesn’t magically cancel out the fact that Israel was established on, and its membership in the UN was continent on, Israeli acceptance of UNR 181.
Let’s say I own two houses next to each other. I offer to rent them, one to you and the other to someone you don’t like, for $1,000 per month each.
You accept. The person you don’t like doesn’t accept.
That doesn’t mean you don’t have to pay your damn rent.
Does not apply.
If you're going to try to hand-wave away things you don't want brought into the discussion, at least do so theatrically. Entertainment may not be a good substitute for argument, but it's better than being boring.
Weak
The IDF are so brave dropping bombs on defenseless people trapped in their open air prison camp. No more buildings left to bomb so now they're bombing people in tents. Exactly like how the Romans would have mercilessly crushed a slave revolt in 30 BC if they had these kind of weapons of mass destruction.
According to our resident propagandists: this is an act of supreme kindness, giving Palestinians choice. We can slaughter and terrorize you, or you can choose to go into the desert.
It’s such a huge coincidence that this genocide has nothing to do with Christianity or Judaism, but it’s mostly Christians and Jews committing it. Crazy!
Your conflation of Jewishness with Judaism doesn’t magically make the two the same; nor does it magically make Zionism an inherent function of either.
Anyone who chooses to call themselves Jewish should realize that they’re supporting the continuation of the religious ideology of Judaism. The US empire has successfully convinced even stringent Leftists about Judaism being an ethnicity or Race. Has Islam ever been suggested by the US empire to be a race or ethnicity? No. We should remember that Hitler also shared this horrible belief that Judaism is somehow genetic, but it’s not, it’s solely a chosen ideology.
Why should anyone who chooses to identify with an ethnic group “realize” that you get to define them as doing something else?
Judaism is a religion. Jews are an ethnic group. Many, but not nearly all, ethnic Jews practice, endorse, or support the religion. Zionism was founded by an atheist (Theodore Herzl) and brought to fruition by another atheist (David Ben-Gurion).
On the basis of your comments so far, I have to doubt you’d know a “leftist” if one walked up behind you and whacked you across the ass with a bass fiddle.
Why should anyone who chooses to identify with an ethnic group “realize” that you get to define them as doing something else?
Judaism is a religion. Jews are an ethnic group. Many, but not nearly all, ethnic Jews practice, endorse, or support the religion. Zionism was founded by an atheist (Theodore Herzl) and brought to fruition by another atheist (David Ben-Gurion).
On the basis of your comments so far, I have to doubt you’d know a “leftist” if one walked up behind you and whacked you across the ass with a bass fiddle.
Jews are not an ethnic group, and Zionism is an ancient idea that is fundamental to the religion of Judaism. Have you noticed that anyone who believes Jews are an ethnic group are never really anti-religion? You haven’t yet dared to believe Judaism is a bad thing, and are still victim of US propaganda. The US empire only assigns race and ethnicity to groups it wishes to help bolster its world domination purposes. If we believe Jews are an ethnic group, then Judaism is protected by blood. That is wrong and horribly dangerous.
If Zionism is fundamental to the religion of Judaism, then why do some adherents of Judaism reject it as opposed to the religion of Judaism?>
Whether I believe Judaism is a bad thing, a good thing, both, or neither is irrelevant to the fact that while Judaism, Jewishness, and Zionism have some overlap, it is entirely possible to be any one of the three without being either of the other two.
Jews who “reject” Zionism may be wishing to reject it personally but they are actually supporting it societally. Here’s how: If non-Zionist interpretations of Judaism are societally allowed, then Zionist interpretation will also be societally allowed under freedom of religious belief. Israel flaunts this social power constantly, as it says any pushback to their genocide is anti-Jewish. Amazingly, this is the only thing they’re not lying about, because for Jews who believe in the ancient idea of Canaan belonging to followers of Judaism, it is anti-Jewish to be against this genocide.
You’re confusing Jews (people of particular ancestry) with Judaism (a religion) again. They’re not the same thing. Nor is Zionism (a political ideology) the same thing as Judaism.
Judaism created the Jewish people. The idea of Jews as an ethnicity is just another interpretation of the religion, one that dangerously implies chosen ideology is somehow in peoples’ DNA. Just like people with their “blue lives matter” belief, Race and Ethnicity are used by people to enforce the existence of certain groups. We should not be doing that to a religion as dangerous as Judaism. The Jewish people, Judaism, and Zionism are merely different historical stages of religious ideology. This is obvious for people who aren’t afraid to believe Judaism is a bad thing. The religion of Judaism is a bad thing, and believing in it as an ethnicity only enforces the existence of the religion. You’re practicing cult denialism.
You’re practicing idiocy, in the particular form of “I will believe whatever I want to believe because it’s what I want to believe, and if I repeat my dumb belief over and over surely everyone else will lose enough IQ points to pretend with me.”
You shouldn’t get any rise from calling people stupid if you’re a full grown man. Calling people stupid is ablism and since we tell children not to do that, adults shouldn’t either. Stop calling me stupid, I don’t appreciate it, and it doesn’t convince me of anything other than your immaturity. Stop it. There are many people who believe the same thing I do. Shlomo Sand, an Israeli historian, believed that the concept of a Jewish ethnicity was invented in modern times to serve nationalist and Zionist purposes. He believed the Jewish ethnicity was not rooted in ethnic origin, but as a religious and cultural construct. Alain F. Corcos, a biologist believed it isn’t right to classify Jews as a particular race, because of intermarrying and conversion. He believed those no longer practicing the religion, should not be labeled Jews. Bruno Bauer argued that a religious identity prevented Jews from integrating into secular society and was against the idea of Jewish ethnicity. People can choose to believe in the concept of Jewish identity, but if they truly believed in the danger of Judaism, why would they choose to believe in the concept?
Calling you stupid would imply an inability on your part to not act like an idiot. Pointing out that you’re engaging in X isn’t the same thing as saying you’re incapable of not engaging in X. If I believed you weren’t capable of ceasing to engage in idiocy, I wouldn’t bother talking with you.
On the other hand, the theoretical possibility that you can’t help it has gotten you a degree of leniency vis a vis the site guideline that forbids “slurs or supremacist claims based on race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, disability, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.”
Since you seem to be saying you can help it, I guess I’ll just start enforcing that guideline more strictly and see whether you’d rather knock it off or leave. Have a nice day.
I’ve said nothing untrue, but if you feel so strongly that I’m causing trouble with my comments (which are rooted in pacifism and anti-spiritual segregation), and you believe people aren’t intellectually strong enough to discuss or think about them, and they should be censored, then go on, keep erasing my words while calling yourself a Libertarian.
My feelings have nothing to do with it.
Neither does whether you’ve said anything untrue.
The site has guidelines. They’re linked from the top of every comment section.
You can abide by them, or you can be banned.
No skin off my nose either way.
What guideline did I break? if it says we should not say prejudicial things about groups does that include other terrible groups of people, like Nazis, Americans, or the IDF? Is it OK to judge these groups and to call these people monsters? You don’t seem to be defending the Nazis or the IDF in the same way you’re defending the Jews, as “The Jews” is just the name for the people who want the religion of Judaism to continue.
I quoted the guideline in question.
You can attack any political ideology you like. Attacking people based on their ethnic group or religion, no — not even if you drum up a fake definition of the latter to pretend you’re not attacking the former.
But you knew that already. You were just continuing to see how much more you could get away with. And now you have your answer: No more. Have a nice life.
So why won’t you quote the guideline my comment violated?
My feelings have nothing to do with it.
Neither does whether you’ve said anything untrue.
The site has guidelines. They’re linked from the top of every comment section.
You can abide by them, or you can be banned.
No skin off my nose either way.
“You’re confusing Jews (people of particular ancestry) with Judaism (a religion) again. They’re not the same thing. Nor is Zionism (a political ideology) the same thing as Judaism.”
Israel’s Law of Return is very specifically oriented towards religion, as is made clear by the the Israeli Supreme Court has ruling that declared such individuals are not eligible for aliyah under the Law of Return.
Converts to Judaism are eligible
So, Zionism (a political ideology) based in a religious interpretation of who qualifies as a returning citizen. Not being be a religious is not an obstacle to aliyah, but being any other religion can be, legally.
So, your categorical classifications around Jews, Judaism and Zionism are faulty, and elide, intentionally or not, an important aspect of Israeli law that is clearly based on religious discrimination.
Israeli law doesn’t control the meanings of Jewishness, Judaism, and Zionism, or the overlap between them.
Israeli law absolutely controls the meaning of the word “Jew” in the context of entitlement to Israeli citizenship. Religion, not ethnicity, is the primary factor determining whether an individual has a right of return.
Yes, Israeli law controls Israeli law. And? Water is also wet, but that doesn’t mean that the words hydrogen, oxygen, and rain are all the same thing.
A real asshole reply.
Are you as stupid as that comment?
I didn’t write “Israeli law controls Israeli law,’
I noted that guarantees of the Right of Return are based on religion. I never claimed anything else, but you’d rather not address the point I made so you spew arraogant bullsht.
What a putz.
The only obvious point involved is the one on top of your head.
LOL.
You’re a pig, posing as an anarchist, but actually an autoritarian.
You can’t refute my point so you throw insults.
Wnna meet up sometime?
Where could we arrange to meet and discuss this mano mano, coward?
Not particularly. I don’t care much for fighting anymore and haven’t been in one in 20 years or so. Back when I did fight, I won some and lost some, but nobody ever got out without knowing they’d been in a fight.
Now that you’ve displayed the willingness to threaten Antiwar.com staff, you’ve fed out plenty of rope to hang yourself and no longer be welcome here. All that’s left is for you to decide whether that’s how you want it to be or not.
As for explanations, like I said, check your premises. You keep asking me why I did something, but you never seem to have considered the possibility that I didn’t do whatever that might be. I don’t owe you answers to ill-considered questions.
So if you didn’t censor my comment, why not just say so and spare us both a lot of bullshit?
So who did censor my comment?
Nobody censored your comment. Only states can censor. But you should probably have figured out by now that comments containing the letters Z, O, and G, in that order and as an acronym, get deleted here.
Noted.
Thanks.
https://youtu.be/U1n9QTkrkP0
https://youtu.be/FjLuJ8dMY_0
Zevon Osborne Garcia
No Go
Roger
Wilco!
Censor, verb – to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable
Websters
Your just adding a requirement that the censoring be done by the government, because it suits your political bias, but that's not the commonly accepted definition of the word.
Otherwise government censor is redundant.
Most private censorship is actually legal under the US Constitution, but that doesn't make it any less censorial.
Judaism is fundamental to Zionism, as the Law of Return demonstrates.
Sure. Except that the Zionist movement was started by an atheist (Herzl), and was mostly carried out by atheists as well, including but not limited to David Ben-Gurion, and was initially rejected by Orthodox Jews as antithetical to Judaism. But yeah, other than the fact that Judaism isn’t fundamental to Zionism, it’s fundamental to Zionism.
Israel is more religiously based than ever.
In July 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that the law was constitutional and did not negate Israel’s democratic character. Writing the opinion for the majority, Esther Hayut, the erstwhile President of the Supreme Court, stated that this “Basic Law is but one chapter in our constitution taking shape and it does not negate Israel’s character as a democratic state.” The court’s majority opinion concurred with arguments that the law merely declares the obvious—that Israel is a Jewish state—and that this does not detract from the individual rights of non-Jewish citizens, especially in light of other laws that ensure equal rights to all
Israel wants to have it both ways, but democracy and religious supremacism don’t mix well.
BTW, my comment was not a threat. It was an offer, which you declined.
People who want a fight out of me have to show up and attack me. I have no urge to prove anything with e.g. duels, and not only because I might get my ass beat, but if it pleases you to believe that would be the result, go for it.
And BTW, you're a coward for not responding to my questioning about why you censored my comment.
FUCK YOU
Check your premises.
So you still won’tsay why you deleted my comment.
What a hypocrite! The anarchist who abuses the tiny little bit of power he possesses and is defiantly unaccountable.
Pathetic.
So you erase my comments when I say that Jews aren’t an ethnicity?You don’t realize that believing in a group’s ethnicity is totally subjective? There’s a reason why people don’t believe the KKK is an ethnicity, and that’s because people don’t want to believe it’s an ethnicity, not because it isn’t one. But the KKK, using your definition of what an ethnicity is, could be considered an ethnicity. You don’t want to believe Judaism is a bad thing, so you enforce the idea it’s an ethnicity. Don’t i have the right to say Christianity or Islam or Judaism are bad things?? You erase my comments for that? You’re against religious freedom? You’re against freedom of speech? I’ve said nothing untrue, but you keep deleting my comments. Let people debate me about it, or are you afraid of something?
Putting question marks after false statements doesn’t make them true statements.
LEFTISTS: “China is the greatest country in the world!”
CHINA: [sits on hands, watching the US/Israel massacre thousands of innocent Palestinians.]
LEFTISTS: “China is the greatest country in the world!”
To add: China is brutal on their 25 million Muslim population, and yet Iran, Iraq, the Arabs, sell China all the oil they can buy. Where are all the cries for BDS?
These Arab countries are afraid to help Palestinians because they know it means war or economic problems with the US. China has the military capability to help. With all the US anti-China propaganda, I’m unsure what to believe about China’s treatment of Muslims. I don’t believe US media, and don’t believe Leftists either. I imagine as war with China starts to build, we’ll be hearing how horrible China is to Muslims. Won’t that be funny to hear the US cry and complain about a country being cruel to Muslims?
BDS is just a weak substitute for ending all Us aid to Israel.
The US doesn't give China billions in aid every year.