Update: Before midnight, President Joe Biden signed the temporary funding bill.
A partial “shutdown” of the federal government, which seemed inevitable amid battles over spending in both chambers of Congress, was averted after the House and Senate passed a stop-gap funding bill without any Ukraine aid on Saturday night. Passed before the midnight deadline, the bill will fund the government until November 17th at 2023 spending levels.
As a result of growing GOP opposition to massive spending on the White House’s proxy war with Russia, aid to Kyiv was dropped from the House leadership’s continuing resolution along with the spending cuts to various government agencies and additional border security funds desired by Republicans.
In order to secure passage of the bill, Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) needed support from the other side of the aisle since GOP opposition to a short-term funding bill precluded the speaker’s slim majority vote.
“We’re going to be adults in the room. And we’re going to keep the government open,” McCarthy said.
During an early closed-door meeting at the Capitol, many House Republicans urged their fellow members to find a way to prevent the “shutdown” eyeing some daunting reelections next year, the Associated Press reported.
The spending package was approved in the House with a vote of 335-91, with 90 Republicans and only one Democrat opposing. Then in a vote of 88-9, the Senate passed the bill as well. The continuing resolution does include an additional $16 billion for natural disasters with a separate vote on Ukraine aid expected soon.
According to Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who voted against the funding bill Saturday night, this agreement on the war was part of a secret deal—made without GOP members’ knowledge prior to Saturday’s vote—between McCarthy and the Democrats.
“Wow. [McCarthy] made a side Ukraine deal with Democrats and didn’t tell House Republicans until after his Continuing Resolution passed. More deceit,” Gaetz wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Gaetz has also warned he will file a motion for a vote aimed at McCarthy’s ouster.
Before the vote, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell—an ardent supporter of the proxy war against the Kremlin—promised “I have agreed to keep fighting for more economic and security aid for Ukraine.”
Sen. Michael F. Bennet (D-CO) explained that he briefly held up proceedings because he insisted Senate leaders issue a statement “underscoring that we’re going to spend the next 45 days working together to pass a robust Ukraine aid package.” Senate leadership, on both sides of the aisle, subsequently issued just such a statement.
Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) assured that the Senate would vote on another Ukraine aid package “in very short order,” as part of a larger funding package for the Pentagon or as a stand-alone bill. He also said he is confident that the House will have the votes necessary for Kyiv’s continued support in its war with Russia.
Another $24 billion in weapons and other aid for Ukraine has been requested by the White House. The US has already pledged $113 billion to Ukraine for the war mostly in military aid, with about $100 billion in weapons and military equipment having been transferred to Ukraine by the US and its allies. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, along with hawks in the legislature, have repeatedly declared the US policy is intended to “weaken” Moscow and cripple its military.
But Saturday’s vote came as Kyiv’s long-awaited counteroffensive has utterly failed, with Ukrainian forces taking massive losses in personnel and equipment while netting no significant gains. Estimates suggest Ukraine’s casualties skyrocketed amidst the failed campaign, with tens of thousands of soldiers being killed during recent months.
Beyond strategic defeats, the proxy war’s popularity has greatly diminished among American voters. In August, a CNN poll exposed that most Americans oppose additional aid to Ukraine, with 55% of all respondents and 71% of Republicans saying Congress should not authorize any more spending.
Concurrently, the Joe Biden administration is rejecting calls to negotiate a ceasefire and is escalating the war. The US is aiding Kyiv’s myriad drone strikes on Crimea and the Russian mainland—including Moscow—by providing the necessary targeting intelligence.
At the same time, Washington is pouring cluster bombs into Ukraine, which are widely banned and notorious for killing civilians, while also sending Abrams tanks armed with toxic depleted uranium ammunition linked to cancer and birth defects.
The White House is preparing to soon provide Kyiv with long-range ballistic missiles, crossing Russia’s “red line.” The Pentagon is expected to send Ukraine the cluster bomb variant of the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), which have a range of almost 200 miles.
Earlier this year, the Discord Leaks revealed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky desires to use “long-range missiles to hit targets inside Russia’s borders.”
Connor Freeman is the assistant editor and a writer at the Libertarian Institute, primarily covering foreign policy. He is a co-host on the Conflicts of Interest podcast. His writing has been featured in media outlets such as Antiwar.com, Counterpunch, and the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. He has also appeared on Liberty Weekly, Around the Empire, and Parallax Views. You can follow him on Twitter @FreemansMind96.
Well maybe they just saved a lot of lives.
The sooner Ukraine ends this nonsense war the sooner their army can stand down.
WoW…. Being up at 5AM can get white hot news before breakfast. As far as I can tell a big battle was won for those of us who believe this Biden/Neocon war on Russia will turn out like the Afghan fiasco, as an very expensive and spectacularly embarrassing failure. 100s of billions pissed away as if America only priority is to win these stupid little wars that have no real threat to us, and make the bums that started all the trouble rich
It’s ironic that republicans are today’s flower children and democrats are the snarling ghouls of war, chemical pollution, and oil.
Only a handful though. Most Republicans are the same Neocon dirtbags they have been since forever
Time to form a more perfect union. Check constituentassembly.org for a schematic suggestion.
When it comes to war, the Reps. are right there agreeing with the Dems., both sides get those MIC/AIPAC donations. There is a uni-party today. The Dems. are calling the shots in their insane domestic and foreign policy, and the Reps. do nothing to stop it. Both parties are guilty to the max for destroying this country, but destruction has to happen before the ‘great reset’ can be implemented.
Spot on, spot on…
There is a way out; write in friends for every elected federal office in the next fake US election.
The anti Ukraine spending Repugs are likely to be hawks on China, or so it seems to me. So the MIC gets its filthy lucre, anyway.
The Military Offense Industry will get their money one way or the other.
Good news but we’re not out of the swamp yet…
Even if the War Party gets its way eventually the role call will be a hit list for voters after the Ukraine fiasco reaches it’s inevitable conclusion… Hopefully that won’t be all of our final conclusion.
There is no doubt that the Joe Biden administration and the Congress hawks are planning WWIII, even if the Ukraine war is increasingly unpopular.
Maybe Biden figures that the only way for him to be reelected next year is to have the USA directly involved in a world war, possibly a nuclear war.
This Account has been suspended.
Contact your hosting provider for more information.
That’s what it said when I tried to access the article by Sachs from this
site. However, when I googled his name, his site came up. What gives? who’s targeting antiwar.com?
The democrats have become everything they claimed to be against pre Obama. They are a bunch of war mongering pigs and I can’t believe I ever voted for or aligned myself with them. I wish RFK, Jr. would run as an independent so that I could morally justify giving him a sizeable donation. It seems to me he’s the only hope for starting to fix our broken democracy.
From what I read recently, Kennedy is indeed going to run as an Independent.
RFK Jr. is making a “major announcement” on October 9, and various rumors, leaks, etc. indicate that the announcement will be that he’s running as an independent.
On the other hand, it recently came to light that he had a private meeting with the chair of the Libertarian National Committee in August (at a libertarianish event, at least the second large one of which he’s spoken at this year), and there seems to be a betting line on him pursuing that party’s nomination rather than going independent.
a betting line on him pursuing that party’s nomination
One way or the other, the odds on Trump just dramatically improved
I’m not sure that this is accurate. Between all the never Trump republicans, Biden is too old democrats, and true independents I think Bobby has a fighting chance and it’s too early to make proclamations about who a third party run will hurt more. I think the argument could be made that Bobby might pull more votes away from Trump given his high favorability among Republicans. It all depends on what happens with Trump’s legal problems and potential three way debates between Trump, Biden, and RFK, Jr.
Either way, thanks everyone for the information about his potential 3rd party run. Based on the comments I’d seen him make previously he seemed to be wedded to the idea of running as a democrat.
I think he’ll take any moderate Republicans from making a protest vote for Biden ( if they actually field him ). Moderate Republicans are fewer and fewer in number if the current challenger’s poll numbers are any indication, also the Dems can’t work their ballot harvesting scheme like they did during the pandemic-monium.
Unless someone gets to the right of Trump on illegal immigration, it’ll be his by decision.
But like you say, it’s early yet.
I don’t know if RFK, Jr. is to the right of Trump on immigration, but he recently released an hour plus documentary on his YT channel about his trip to the border. His conclusion is that Trump was correct about the border wall. He even goes so far as to say that the cartels are the ones truly running the USA’s immigration policy. He calls the situation at the border a “humanitarian crisis,” and vows to begin addressing it day one of his administration.
That is encouraging. Good luck to him.
I’d say it’s more likely that most votes he takes “from” either of the Big Two will be from Trump, on the vaccine/lockdown/mandate issue. But it’s hard to tell just yet. Presumably the 5-10% of the vote he might grab if he runs a well-funded campaign will affect the outcome. I’d expect that effect to favor Biden rather than Trump, but I could be wrong.
We should keep in mind this isn’t going to be a three way race, Cornel West has already announced for an independent run under the Green Party banner. If he gains traction it’ll be a gut punch for Joe Bidet.
Good one, good one…
If he is the Libertarian candidate, he will be on the ballot in almost every state. That would be a game changer.
It will split the Rep. party which would be a good thing for the Dems. Anyway, even if he did actually win, the results could be rigged. I think the Dems. will run Newsome which will advance their insane domestic and foreign policy agendas.
It would also split the Democrat party. Given Biden’s popularity polls, I think there are a lot of people who would only vote for him to keep a Republican from winning. If RFK is seen as having a chance of winning, he would pull votes from both Biden and Trump (or his representative).
As a possible spoiler, RFK might be able to win some concessions just by running.
I’m not sure what the Libertarian Party’s ballot access looks like at the moment, or will look like next year.
Usually at any given time the Libertarian Party has “automatic” ballot access in more than half of the states based on those states’ laws (for example, when I lived in Missouri, the LP got automatic ballot access for the next four years any time it had a candidate get more than 2% in a statewide race). In other states, there are various petition requirements — some easy and cheap, some difficult and expensive.
Since the 2022 national convention, the “national party” has been losing about 500 members per month (starting from 20,000 total or so), spending more money than it takes in, suing and trying to take over several state parties that have disaffiliated from the national committee (leaving them, not the “national party,” in control of who gets their ballot lines), etc. If the 2024 national convention were to nominate RFK, I’d expect several more state parties to disaffiliate rather than put him on their ballot line.
🙁
This is a very depressing post. US politics is more corrupt and bought than I ever thought. And I thought it was bad to begin with.
Thanks for this. Puts things in a different perspective.
If memory serves me, Kucinich is running the RFK, Jr. campaign.
And, when the next pandemic hits, he will do what?
Not destroy the economy and not institute a totalitarian regime of biomedical fascism. He would also probably make sure that our regulatory agencies such as the CDC and FDA are not acting as marketing wings of big pharma and are instead acting on behalf of the American people.
That would be an achievement in itself.
Can’t access the Jeffery Sachs article. Here’s what it says:
This Account has been suspended.
Contact your hosting provider for more information.
However, I googled his name and his site did come up. What gives? Seems someone doesn’t want antiwar.com to run this article.
You are certainly industrious Lilly!
Lily Sandoz
Thomas L. Knapp
38 minutes ago
Detected as spam
Can’t access the Jeffery Sachs article. Here’s what it says:
This Account has been suspended.
Contact your hosting provider for more information.
However, I googled his name and his site did come up. What gives? Seems someone doesn’t want antiwar.com to run this article.
Been trying to alert you to some censorship on the Sachs article, but keeps coming up spam every time I post it for your observation.
Sorry, I was offline for a little while this afternoon so it took me longer than usual to get by and check spam.
I get a “site suspended” message when I click the link as well.
I can’t be SURE that it’s the same article, but here’s one at Sachs’s own site that looks like it may be.
As to what it looks like, there are a few usual reasons for a “site suspended” message like that, and “someone didn’t want this content to be seen” is way down the list. The TOP of the list is that the site uses shared hosting with bandwidth or CPU percentage limits and something caused it to exceed those limits. Could be as ominous as a DDOS attack, or as trivial as the plan being low-budget enough that links from Antiwar.com, etc. caused the site to exceed its plan limits.
I would prefer he go Independent for several reasons as the Libertarian Party has never gained any traction in national elections. However, with someone with the name and recognition of Kennedy, he might change that.
If I was still involved with the Libertarian Party, I’d be against nominating him because he’s not a libertarian. Which is not the same thing as saying that I disagree with all of his issues positions.
But last year, a Republican PAC took over the Libertarian Party and is doing a great job of bankrupting it and making it even less relevant and effective than it was before. When that PAC took over my state party, I changed my registration to “no party affiliation” and then to Forward Party, but I’m just really not interested much in doing party political work or anything anymore, and my term as an exceedingly minor public official expires at the end of October (I’m not seeking reappointment), so to me the whole thing is pretty much a spectator sport now.
The only person running for president right now that I’d likely consider voting for is me, and I’m probably going to drop out Real Soon Now.
LMAO…
He did announce running as Independent, Democrats were destroying him from day one.
Time for many Democrats to move on. But also many Republicans that are really war mongering Democrats — time to evaluate their existence. With 75% Republicans opposing Ukraine aid, 55% overall — both Republicans and Demicrats were put on notice by US voters.
Kennedy running as indepenent is what is needed. He needs to formulate a movement, a form of a national plebiscit, to disassociate himself from warmongers, extremists and Cold war diehards that inhabit both parties. Agree, it will be easier for him to raise funds, and get volunteers to staff his campaign.
“He did announce running as Independent”
No, he hasn’t announced that yet. He’s announced that there will be SOME kind of announcement on October 9, and various leaks/rumors are that the announcement will be that he’s running as an independent.
Is there ANYBODY else for people like us who have abandoned the unitary WAR parity…..????????
Right now the answer is NO.
Even if RFK gets elected, I doubt there would be any change, Obama and Trump both ran on change and ending the endless wars, but neither did anything to stop them, Obama started more wars and Trump almost attacked Iran, but got talked out of it. Check it out. The system is corrupt and the only way to get into the system is through corruption.
Dunno about that Frank. RFK’s just another bitch for Israhell and an anti-vaxxer to boot.
My vote’s going to Dr. Cornel West, the only candidate who can effect REAL change. He won’t win, but my conscience will be clear.
He was played into that position by the Israeli lobby by leaking his comments on gain of function research and the ability for state actors to engineer viruses that can target populations based on genotype. It was either go full in on Israel or be smeared non stop as an anti-Semite. That incident has been the low point of his campaign so far and has been his only misstep in my opinion.
Nah, a Palestinian/Jordanian offed his dad. Irish people get sentimental over things like that.
RFK, Jr. doesn’t believe Sirhan Sirhan killed his father. So your point is moot.
He says he forgives him, that’s a very different thing than professing innocents.
I’m positive he’s on the record saying he doesn’t believe Sirhan Sirhan killed his father. Check out his recent interview on Bill Maher’s podcast.
edit: He thinks that Sirhan was involved, but did not hit his father when he fired.
What isn’t in doubt is his antipathy towards the plight of the Palestinians.
ZEROING IN ON IT…!!!!!!!!!
Because everybody tells truth rest east…!!!!
AH YES THE FLY IN THE OINK MINT
OH, SURE THAT HIT WAS ON THE UP & UP.. NO PATSY JUST BAD ARABS…… THEE $64 BILLION QUESTION… DOES HE BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL STORY…???
& IF R WASN’T HIT TO KEEP HIM FROM SOLVING JFK, WHY…??????????????????
Hey Gyp! Click on this at antiwar.com home page and see what happens: NATO Admits That Ukraine War Is the War of NATO Expansion by Jeffrey D. Sachs
Hey Gyp! Click on this at antiwar.com home page and see what happens: NATO Admits That Ukraine War Is the War of NATO Expansion by Jeffrey D. Sachs
So, what else is new? As soon as Joey gets a chance he’ll be promising Zelensy whatever toys he wants, and the two wings of the war party will fellate appropriately by giving supreme commander zelensky whatever he asks for.
Our government is being run by Aholes.
Meh. There are various ways that the Biden Admin can use to keep the money flowing to Kiev in the short term. Meanwhile, the story out of DC seems to be that McCarthy has promised the Dems a separate, up or down, vote on the Ukie funding. I see the removal of the funding from the budget bill to be a sop to the lukewarm Repubs in the House. The bill included Biden’s request for disaster aid, the only deviation from a completely “clean” continuing resolution deal. Everything else that the House GOP wanted was left out, and McCarthy had to have some kind of sweetener to present to his caucus, as he caved on the shutdown.
I would also point out that many if not most of the House GOP anti Ukraine bloc are not exactly “peaceniks,” as they are bellicose towards China, Mexico, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, etc., they non-stop fellate the “brave men and women in uniform” as much or more than anyone else, they favor an even more massive “defense” budget, and they otherwise buy into and are part of the bipartisan MIC that is firmly in charge, all of these kabuki theater shenanigans with the budget, the debt ceiling, etc., notwithstanding.
FJB and FVZ
This is the day after the aid to Ukraine was transiently scrapped and must now be restored in a new bill from Congress to President Biden. MIA: where today is the tsunami from members of Congress for the support of such a bill?
Still waiting for the Antiwar article condemning Canadian Nazism. This use to be automatic. You cant do it can you? You know your funding depends on your silence.
In Ukraine, the United States, Canada and Britain, have built monuments to the Ukrainian SS veterans who killed over a million Jews, hundreds of thousands of Poles, and countless Ukrainians, Russians and Byelorussians. This is who Yaroslav Hunka is, a monster.
“You know your funding depends on your silence.”
On the contrary, I expect that several donors have already asked, or will be asking, why there’s been no article on the matter written by the site’s reporters (we’ve featured the topic on the front page, as reported by other sites).
On the commentary side, so far as I know Antiwar.com doesn’t tell the columnists it carries what to write about. But I’ll be surprised if there aren’t some commentaries coming in over the next week on the subject. Presumably someone other than you finds it at least mildly interesting, although most people seem to understand that it’s a minor story about the Canadian government acting like, as you point out, it always acts.
Its interesting that most of the pro-war media is silent too. At least thats one thing you have in common, the truth is the last thing that media will print.
And the last thing this publication will do is have an editorial condemning Nazism……because that would put a spotlight on the Russian NATO war and just who we are supporting.
NAZI’S where given power in Kiev after NATO violently overthrew the government. This new Nazi government that NATO put in power was armed and then sent to kill Russians. The best money NATO ever spent.
These people are monsters, parasites on humanity, total psychopaths. Not that this publication will call any of it out. Because you know, your antiwar.
“And the last thing this publication will do is have an editorial condemning Nazism”
I suspect you’re right — that when and if the site ever shuts down, its last article WILL be an article condemning Nazism, just like the thousands of articles condemning Nazism it’s published up to now.
it’s a minor story about the Canadian government acting like, as you point out, it always acts.
But it de does beg the question, how did a Ukrainian Nazi get into Canada and how many are there now?
Another question bound to come up is where does Hunka go from there… This story has legs.
Well, hopefully it has legs.
The UK let Hunka in after the war, where he married a British woman and then they emigrated to Canada. He doesn’t seem to have been an intelligence agency recruit, but could possibly be.
I heard they used them as strike brakers.