Assuming the post of director general of the IAEA on Tuesday, Rafael Grossi said the body would give Iran time to explain traces of unenriched uranium found in the country, saying time may be of the essence, but arbitrary deadlines “might not be the best idea.”
The IAEA has been trying to get clarification on the traces of uranium, which despite the US hyping them as a huge concern, are a minor number of particles of processed but not enriched uranium, not a serious proliferation risk.
Grossi seemed to be trying to set the stage for his leadership of the IAEA with his comments, saying he wants to avoid an “antagonistic relationship” and that it would be easier to sort this out working together with Iran.
That’s probably not going to sit well with the US, which very much wants the IAEA to be more hostile toward Iran, but Grossi says that he thinks it wouldn’t be appropriate to start making proclamations before his first meeting with Iran.
Why look just for traces? Go to Occupied Palestine. That’s where the rogue entity has stockpiled massive atom bombs.
The US encourages Grossi’s mounting desire to spend more time with his family while they are still healthy.
I thought the entire point of Treaties was that both sides agreed to terms then abided by them. Why would a side the refuses to uphold their side be surprised at the otherside violating the treaty. Is this the result of our leaders having been never exposed to school playgrounds and therefore never developing the simple social skills needed to get on in life?
New qualification for elected officials – must have been punched in the face at-least 1 time, but no more than 3 times.
Can the USA ever stop assuming everyone else is wrong about every issue???
False flags have been flying all over the region for decades now. It is hard to believe anything anymore.
So which “inspector” deposited the contamination? Was it the one who tried to sneak in explosives?