In a 398-17 vote, the House of Representatives on Tuesday passed H. Res 246,
a bill which expresses opposition to the BDS movement targeting Israel.
The language of the bill presents BDS as contrary to US policy, and
claims that BDS is harmful to the two-state solution that the US
supports.
BDS, which stands for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions, is a campaign
founded to try to pressure Israel over the occupation of Palestine, The
intention was to apply economic pressure on Israel for certain
activities with respect to the occupation.
While boycotting countries over behavior isn’t that unusual, the US
government’s pro-Israel bias meant that in 1977, the US started passing
laws trying to prevent American citizens and companies from specifically
participating in BDS against Israel, forming the Office of Antiboycott
Compliance.
In the past couple of years, Israel has sought to attack BDS on a global
scale by present it as de facto anti-Semitism. As usual, US officials
were eager to get on the record with being very anti-BDS, even if these
bills don’t formally outlaw participating in the BDS on an individual
level.
This comes as Israel is increasingly a political issue in the US as
well, with President Trump trying to present the Democrats as
anti-Semites for not being as pro-Netanyahu as he personally is. While
Democrats overwhelmingly backed the anti-BDS bill today, there remains a political split on the issue.
That’s because Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is offering a competing resolution which expresses support for Americans’ right to boycott other nations, including Israel. Democratic leadership were quick to condemn Omar’s proposal as “dead on arrival.”
Historically, of course, boycotting other nations has been considered an
aspect of Americans’ right to free speech. Omar’s resolution, however, isn’t expected to even get a serious discussion in committee, let alone a proper vote on the floor of the House.
House Overwhelmingly Passes Anti-BDS Bill
Still unclear if Rep. Omar's pro-BDS bill will get a vote
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×