Egypt’s military junta continues to ratchet up the pressure on Qatar today, and has issued a statement demanding that the United States unconditionally expel Qatar from the anti-ISIS coalition, saying it is inappropriate for the coalition to have a member that “supports terrorism.”
Allegations of Qatar supporting terrorism are heavily based around Egypt’s anger at al-Jazeera\s supportive coverage of Egypt’s democratic election, before the summer 2013 coup, and their less-than-supportive view of the violent post-coup crackdowns by the junta.
In practice this is only a limited part of the anti-Qatar move, and the broad demands against them, which include shutting down all Qatari media, forcing them to expel Turkey from its military base in Qatar, and closing diplomatic posts within Iran.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates issued a new statement today insisting that all the demands, already spurned by Qatar, remain outstanding, and that the sanctions and blockade imposed against them will remain in place until they capitulate.
Qatar appears unlikely to ever actually do so, however, as they’ve shifted most of their trade away from Saudi Arabia and toward Turkey, and have insisted the demands violate their national sovereignty are an unacceptable.
why does Ditz keep calling President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi Egypt’s military junta, it seems to consist of just one person.
I like it..!!!!! The Obaminents somehow passed the Sissi Coup off as an election…. As to keep our TAX money flowing to those brutal bastardz…
junta means “a group of persons”
LOL, expel Qatar because they “supports terrorism”? Right, because Saudi Arabia doesn’t at all. True that Qatar had teamed up with Saudi Arabia to fund, arm and provide sanctuary to Sunni Jihadist terrorist groups fighting in Libya and Syria, but Qatar had discontinued the support well before the head choppers of Saudi Arabia did. Now, I am beginning to really wonder if all this hate on Qatar recently has anything to do with Jared Kushner’s family not receiving the $500,000 million to help pay off a bad debt. Seems too coincidental.
Real good topic for next discussion concerning the momonements clause…
Maybe a good time to AGAIN disuss the emoluments clause and the dangers personal enritchmrnr poses to good policy & governance….