Just a couple of months out from inauguration, President Trump has been pushing for some pretty substantial escalations of America’s involvement in the ISIS war. This is true the world over, with special forces being deployed in growing numbers, but nowhere is it more obvious than in Syria, where the US has gone from a few hundred troops to a few thousand.
As those troops increase, so do the military goals being set out for Pentagon commanders, which has many of them concerned that they are facing large-scale mission creep, and are being pushed in the direction of scrapping previous efforts to make sure local forces were doing all the heavy lifting on the ground, and that US troops were just facilitators.
This was already less and less true in Iraq, where under the Obama Administration the deployment was in the 5,000-6,000 troop range. But in Syria it is far more obvious that the limited number of allies on the ground aren’t going to be the ones doing more, and faster, in the fight, but rather the US troops are.
Some officials are said to be convinced that the escalation is less about broadening the mission than about speeding up the mission they already had, though this seems to be a split among leadership officials, with many also believing that the allied forces are going to quickly be sidelined in favor of more US-dominated operations in the seemingly endless conflict in Syria.
Already, deployments are expanding well beyond simply “advising” in the fight against ISIS in Syria, with US Marines deployed with howitzer, and with expectations that they’re going to be firing them. And in a move totally disconnected from the ISIS war, US Army Rangers were deployed to Manbij, apparently just to keep Turkey from invading the Kurdish-held city.
These deployments are just the tip of the iceberg, with another 1,000 troops to be directly deployed to Syria, and some 2,500 more on the way to Kuwait, where they’ll be waiting for any commander in Iraq or Syria to find something for them to do. With the fight escalating in all sorts of ways, they likely won’t be waiting long.
This is the first time the White Helmets and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has condemned a U.S. bombing raid on the rebels in my memory. Has their been a switch in tactics in the war in Syria with the U.S. now attacking their former secret allies in Syria?
Or the White Helmets have been infiltrated by honest reporters?
http://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/north-koreas-lithium-6-production-for-nuclear-weapons ” suggests that North Korea is making more lithium 6 than it needs in its nuclear weapons program. These findings add credibility to North Korea’s claims that it has been developing thermonuclear” read between lines,, DPRK potentially has hundreds of warheads of 100-200 kt fission-fusion-fission
Its a little late now to be worried about that sort of ‘mission creep’, as if it wasn’t obvious that any of these regional actors would gladly to fight to the last American to further their own cause.
Too true.
The US is intent on taking Syria. It always has been since the fall of the Soviet Union but there’s not going to be any diplomacy involved with Trump. As is common to N.Korea and Iran, Trump’s bravado is in motion. Americans are with it and are being convinced that there is no risk involved from other nuclear powers.
During the Vietnam war this was known as “escalation”.
Trump has moved the hands of the nuclear clock forward much more than any other happening in the world since the Cuba crisis/Turkey missile crisis.
And Raimondo continues to support Trump, with what can only be described now as stubbornness and too much vanity to admit he’s so wrong.
If this site is to be any contribution in the least for the side of peace, Raimondo must be stooped by somebody.