Speculation continues to grow on several positions in President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet, but nowhere is the attention more intense than on the future Secretary of State, with the early “front-runners” losing favor rapidly.
While a lot of media reports included several potential figures, John Bolton was seen as the main candidate for awhile. He’d clearly be a problematic choice, as an outspoken hawk with little patience for diplomacy, as America’s top diplomat.
Reports then suggested former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani was the front-runner, but there are growing concern about the money he took from the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MeK) when the group was still listed as a foreign terrorist organization by the State Department. The MeK bankrolled a heavy lobbying campaign with several high-profile figures, like Giuliani, advocating for them and finally getting them off the terror list.
Sen. Rand Paul (R – KY), who holds the potential deciding vote on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has been quick to say he doesn’t consider either of them a suitable candidate. Sen. Paul was said to back committee chairman Sen. Bob Corker (R – TN) as an alternative who is “not likely to be loading the bombs to go to Iran tomorrow.”
Former US Ambassador to Germany Richard Burt is also considered a possible alternative. A realist, Burt is primarily known as the chief negotiator for the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START 1). Burt also served as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Canadian Affairs, and is the American chair of the global anti nuclear weapons group Global Zero.
Talk also emerged Wednesday that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R – CA), a member of the House International Relations Committee. Rohrabacher was one of only a handful of Congressmen to oppose US sanctions against Russia in recent years, and would likely fit well in the position given the priority Trump has made of rapprochement with Russia.
Meanwhile, South Carolina Lt. Gov. Henry McMaster claimed Gov. Nikki Haley might be under consideration. McMaster claimed he was in talk with the transition team and was himself under consideration for attorney general.
Thank God Rand Paul is there! Maybe we won’t have a maniac at State after all…
It is sad that these regurgitated old guys are the best Trump can find.
Surely there must be a career diplomat some place who can do this job as it was meant to be done.
At this point, I’d settle for someone without experience who wouldn’t toe the War Party’s line.
Pat, I’m sure there are plenty of career diplomats out there who’d fit the bill as SOS and get the job done as it was meant to be.
Two of the worst Secretaries of State I know of are Hillary Clinton and Madeleine Albright. Both caused the deaths of thousands – perhaps, millions – of innocents worldwide while holding that post. That’s why this vital post MUST be held by someone who’s NOT a Ziocon – someone who regards Russia and China as partners and friends, not as enemies.
Charles W. Freeman Jr. would be an excellent choice for Secretary of State.
“…as an outspoken hawk with little patience for diplomacy, as America’s top diplomat.”—–Jason Ditz
A person (Bolton) that has little patience for diplomacy should be the last considered for the job of a diplomat. Choosing Bolton for SOS would show extremely poor judgement on Trump’s part.
now they are considering Nikki Haley. it’s surreal. the woman has a B.S. in accounting and no world experience.
I think I remember Rohrabacher being critical of our interventionism. If so, he’d be a good fit. Or Pat Buchanan.
He should listen carefully to Sen. Paul, though Paul has been too much of a Zionist suck-up for my taste.
Senator Rand Paul, watch your back and stay away from flying in small airplanes. Former Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota and his family were murdered by the Bush ’43 regime because he opposed the Iraq war (see: https://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/110102_wellstone.html ).
Forewarned is forearmed, Mr. Paul.
Did Trump lie to us ? Now they say ROMNEY ? We are screwed !!
“Did Trump lie to us?”
His lips moved, didn’t they?
They-them-those are news source X or news source Y with no attribution as to the origin of the “being considered”. It is all one mysterious cauldron. I’m inclined to believe nothing until I read it straight from the source, the Trump administration.
https://twitter.com/transition2017