A new study from Wayne State University’s Elizabeth Stoycheff provides strong evidence that the growing perception of government surveillance of Internet communication is having a serious deleterious impact on the willingness of individuals to express “controversial” views online.
The study found that subjects primed before questioning with information giving them the impression the government is watching what they say are much less likely to disclose political views, and are reluctant to reveal any non-mainstream opinions they hold.
The study showed that people not afraid of surveillance are actually slightly more likely to express controversial opinions in an environment “hostile” to those views, but that their willingness falls precipitously if they think the government is watching.
Stoycheff concluded that mass surveillance is silencing minority views, saying policymakers need to think more carefully about the impact their “national security precautions” have on free speech.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Baghdad's Fortified Green Zone Opens to Public - December 10th, 2018
- US Hopes for an Afghan Peace Deal by April Appear Dim - December 10th, 2018
- US Threatens to Punish China With More Tariffs as 'Hard Deadline' Looms - December 10th, 2018
- Yemen Prisoner Swap Deal Underway as Talks Continue - December 10th, 2018
- Yemeni Govt Rejects UN Peacekeeping Mission in Hodeidah - December 10th, 2018