With last week’s death of a US Special Forces soldier serving as the first confirmed instance of US ground troops put in combat operations in Iraq, the Pentagon has spent most of this week distancing itself from the old “non-combat” narrative, insisting the war obviously involves ground combat, and setting the stage for today’s plan to send special forces into Syria to fight ISIS.
Today, however, hot off the heels of this new deployment announcement, the White House is back to spinning the whole thing as “non-combat,” insisting the strategy “hasn’t changed” and that the troops are going to serve in a purely advisory role, a claim that contradicts what the Pentagon has been saying for days.
Incredibly, the White House is also defending sending ground troops to Syria as not violating President Obama’s pledge not to put “boots on the ground” in Syria, insisting anyone who interprets the grounds troops as boots on the ground is taking the president “out of context.”
Thus, while the Pentagon had seemingly resigned themselves to ceding the argument about combat, the White House seems determined to maintain the pretense, through countless new escalations, that the war remains some purely theoretical, aid-based exercise.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Al-Shabaab Ambushes Ethiopian Troops in Somalia - January 21st, 2019
- US and North Korea Wrap Up 'Intensive' Denuclearization Talks - January 21st, 2019
- Israel Destroyed Eight Syrian Air Defense Targets, Killed 11 Troops - January 21st, 2019
- US Troops Targeted in Second Northeast Syria Bombing - January 21st, 2019
- Israeli Election Ad Brags on Bombing Gaza Back to the Stone Age - January 21st, 2019