Tensions are once again soaring on the Korean Peninsula, with news that South Korea has fired 36 artillery rounds at targets inside North Korea, a move they called “retaliation” after a detected, but unconfirmed, small projectile crossing the border from the north.
Officials say they believe North Korea fired a “small rocket” at a government loudspeaker in South Korea in response to the broadcasts of anti-north propaganda from it. North Korea had been complaining about the propaganda broadcasts for awhile.
Both sides have insisted their were no casualties in the incident, and South Korea says it is raising its alert status to the highest theoretical level, while stepping up their broadcasts through the loudspeakers aimed at North Korean soil.
The two Koreas have been at war since 1950, with no formal peace deal ever signed. The US is a party to this war as well, on the side of South Korea, and keeps a significant military garrison on the border. Exchange of fire across the border is not unusual, and commonly leads to tit-for-tat escalations for several days or weeks that follow.
"Seoul began blasting anti-North Korean propaganda from loudspeakers on the border on Aug.10, resuming a tactic that both sides had halted in 2004."
The South Korean puppet government was probably spurred into doing this by Ashes Carter or John "The Waterboarder" Brennan.
Korea defended itself from American gun boat diplomacy in 1870’s after kicking French and English in 1860’s.
US thinking like Commodore Perrys gunbosts in Japan ” trade or die suckers found the Koreans to be harder nut to crack.
US kidnaps Korea’s leading Genral who was negoyiating for his Emporer , threaten to kill him unless Korea signs trade pact.
Korea says screw you and the US fleet destroys and massacres 5 Korean forts defended by blundebuss rifles and ancient cannons.
US says we got your 5 Commanders sign or elde and Korea sats kepp them if you wsnt too but they eere calling upon the whole nation to resist.
US never fouht Japanese in Korea they just invaded and decided thtough UN to divide nation rather than fight Rusdia china anf Korea.
Nation was supposed to have reunification vote and at time of North Invasion of douth the people were not pro US but pro reinification.
REASON: US had installed a brutal Dictator who was darling of Mc Carthur and US industrial interest. THERE WAS NO POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AT ALL IN south and was far more repressive than North at that time.
China intervened because of US
intervention as both they and Russian interest did not want US leading a neighbor
nation.
To North Koreans, Chins and Russia the US invasion was a continuation of WWII by breaking agreements Russia was party too.
China had to fight Chiang Kai Chek’s US supported military until 1950’s when they finally kicked out US and Koumintangs barbaric armys.
History is not the short sweet sh.. US children were fed in schools.
Tell an American US owns Okinawa and lets Japan manage the Okinawan peoples and they say no way.
South Korea and Japan today no more than US.Asian corporate interest Not realy true Sovereign nations and Korea is still a
UN protectorate.
Pathetic spelling and sentence structure lessens your credibility.
I never asked for anyones opinions upon my credibility, but now you brought it up with your criticism correctly written; does it change historical evidence; Or is it but an attempt to impress, while not lending one pertinent point of information as to the subject at hand, Korea.
Two hundred years of history that is of starts and ends, periods of stasis and chaos, seperated into pertinent points concerning today and to then be quickly and coarsely written from random memories of my minds accumulated
knowlege, I admit is not gramaticly perfect in its presentation, but I look upon it as a rough draft.
I do not write for those who cannot read between the lines, and in manner of a passer by presented points of interest, And not as a fn full blown scholarly dissertation upon Korean history.
A man of learning once told this student of the duties of an a educator, “To bring forth from their students minds the need to learn of those things beyond what
their teachers know of”; so I leave the small minds to proofread while others
search out the kernals of thoughts into full germanation.
The best told lies of men are those well written, and always contain a kernal of
truth; it is up to we who can discern what is hidden by the dotted I and the
crossed T to expose those lies.
I never asked for anyones opinions upon my credibility, but now you brought it up with your criticism correctly written; does it change historical evidence; Or is it but an attempt to impress, while not lending one pertinent point of information as to the subject at hand, Korea.
Two hundred years of history that is of starts and ends, periods of stasis and chaos, seperated into pertinent points concerning today and to then be quickly and coarsely written from random memories of my minds accumulated
knowlege, I admit is not gramaticly perfect in its presentation, but I look upon it as a rough draft.
I do not write for those who cannot read between the lines, and in manner of a passer by presented points of interest, And not as a fn full blown scholarly dissertation upon Korean history.
A man of learning once told this student of the duties of an a educator, “To bring forth from their students minds the need to learn of those things beyond what
their teachers know of”; so I leave the small minds to proofread while others
search out the kernals of thoughts into full germanation.
The best told lies of men are those well written, and always contain a kernal of
truth; it is up to we who can discern what is hidden by the dotted I and the
crossed T to expose those lies.