Only a week ago the IAEA confirmed Iran was living up to all of its requirements under the extended P5+1 nuclear deal. They’re still not satisfied, and are griping about unresolved questions about Iran’s past research.
The “deadline” for Iran to answer questions to the IAEA has passed, and Iran of course answered all those questions several times. Yet the answers didn’t satisfy the IAEA, so they’re insisting it doesn’t count as a real answer.
The problem of course is that Iran was mostly asked about stuff they didn’t do, and which the IAEA never had any decent evidence they did, and so “substantial” replies beyond “we didn’t” aren’t really possible
In the meantime, Iran is redesigning the Arak Heavy Water reactor, to end Western complaints about plutonium in the waste product. The whole point of a heavy water reactor was to replace the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) as a source of medical isotopes.
The TRR was causing problems because it ran on 20 percent enriched uranium, and no one would sell Iran fuel for it. Iran made their own, which caused complaints about “high enrichment” of uranium. The Arak plant runs on unenriched uranium, but fueled complaints about its waste products. Its unlikely that any redesign is going to satisfy the West, because complaining seems to be an end unto itself.
Iran better figure out how to prove a negative or they these morons will bomb them back to the stone age.
These violent psychos will bomb them back to the stone age anyway.
Bombing back Iran to Stone Age take thousands of western Air Force, while Iran will bomb the US navel stationed in Persian gulf, while Iran will bomb Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and all other places where us Marin's are stationed, Iran will bomb Israel and even NATO in turkey, so it is not that easy for west to bomb Iran, what Iran can do is to tell west that they are no longer interested in their bulling policies and get out of negotiating table.
you are most likely right why I suspect the US cant do much…i suspect Iran also has people stationed to do more damage in west countries should the US follow zio orders
Starting war with Iran is for west losing their source of oil and military hard wear sale to Saudis/UAE and rest of the same regimes in the reaction. Obama politics has been about expending the Saudis Sunni regime, or if you will "caliphate" into Iraq and Syria to stop the unifications between these country that was flourishing, he simply got his orders from Saudis.
What he was not able to recognize, du to these people limited intellect, is ISIS and them being supported by CIA, Turkish government, Saudis and UAE which questions his and his advisers ability to see the outcome. Now the people in Middle East have to deal with a very long war with ISIS which have straighten the Iranian influence in the region more, therefore, west is pushing Iran to the limit and won't stop its bullying attitude toward Iran making sure that Iran is there to save the west economic interests.
Israel continue to feed the IAEA false information to implicate Iran in some illegal scheme, this is why they keep running into a brick wall.
gets your nukes now Iran…obama has got an itchy figure on the trigger….with the zios breathing down his neck…probably threatening him and his family if they dont act…
Same poop, different day. Hey Iran, you guys still breathing? Yes, then you haven't done enough to please the West. Pathetic.
The twist to all of this is that Saudi Arabia and its Sunni neighbors are financing groups such as ISIS and the non-aligned Sunni extremists elsewhere in the region- the same people were are supposed to be against in order to curb their influence. Call me crazy, but wouldn't it seem LOGICAL to ally with the natural enemy of these groups, the Shi'a of Iran and Syria? If we want to curb ISIS, we ally with Iran- if we want to curb Iran, we ally with Saudi Arabia. It's not like we can have it both ways and come out on top. Playing in the middle of the road is the most dangerous place to play.
As for the Iranian nuclear situation, I suspect it's not the IAEA that's not satisfied with Iran's compliance. Again, call me crazy, but I have a sneaky suspicion that this dissatisfaction stems directly from Washington and Tel Aviv.