Israeli officials continue to rail against a diplomatic pact between the P5+1 and Iran, today focusing on the idea that such a deal would get in the way of Israeli plans to attack Iran.
Over the weekend, the collapse of the deal was nominally on the exact opposite pretext, that Israel would use the deal as an excuse to start a war with Iran, but that seems not to be the case.
Major General Giora Eiland says that the deal would as a practical matter shut down any option of an Israeli attack, and while others insisted Israel would “do what’s necessary,” it would risk a major backlash against them in the international community.
Other officials went as far as to accuse the US of trying to make a deal, even a “bad” one, specifically to avoid an Israeli attack. Israeli officials have insisted repeatedly that they “reject” any deal and wouldn’t feel bound by it.
Obama knows that if Israel starts a war America will have to finish it because he knows that the Iranians would rightly NEVER believe that America did not have some involvement, and of course they would have involvement because any retaliation, probably by missile would involve American Patriot batteries defending Israel! Under the rules of War a country actively defending another country with its own troops has joined the conflict as an active participant! That America has naval assets in the Gulf means that they are actively acting in Iran's worst interest!
The deal with Iran would make it harder to start war and that, God forbid, is the last thing Israeli warmongers would want.
Israel and the CIA trained Takfiris Criminals and Cannibals having morphed the Syrian dissatisfaction with Assad into a full blown civil war and despite the Saudi $$$ financing the conflict the numbnuts are still getting their collective a**whopped by Hezbollah and the Syrian Army.
Iran paraded some new AA missiles and released a video showing bombing Tel-Aviv the same day the agreement was imminent. These actions show that Iran does not view an agreement with the United States as a guarantee that Israel doesn't attack. They understand that Israel may attack by itself. Which is why they conducted those psyops as a signal to Israel. To make things absolutely clear, there's no reason why the US should not put a clause in the agreement clarifying it does not speak for Israel or guarantee Israeli conduct.
What the Israelis are really alarmed about is that it's beginning to sink in that Obama has no intention of bombing Iran, or helping Israel in a war against Iran.
Israel's policy of constant expansionism is actuated by it's regularly attacking and savaging neighbors who are military invalids and cannot retaliate with anything other than the occasional suicide bombing pin prick. For enemies that can actually stand up for themselves Israel's policy is "let's you and him fight" , and hides behind the US. Of course this can only be successful if the US can be manipulated into having their own children die, and their own taxpayers prostrated, by using it's fifth columnists, Israel firsters to push us into it. America must say no to Israel and drive these parasitical traitors from our corridors of power. That process is only just beginning but will gain inertia slowly and steadily. We can only hope it is not too late.
How about the US starts threatening israel if they attack Iran, and watch the criminal netenyahoo become semi-reasonable in an instant.
He wouldn't though. He would just call his pets in the US Congress and viola, impeachment proceedings begin posthaste.
Israeli belligerence towards Iran is "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." If the Israeli government believed they could get away with an attack on Iran without devastating consequences, they'd have done so after the US provided Israel with refueling aircraft and bunker buster bombs in 2010. Netanyahu's plan is to have the US bear all the casualties, costs, and consequences of attacking Iran, but that is obviously not going to work if the US makes peace with Iran. So the Israeli's will continue to do everything they can to prevent peace, and anything they believe they can get away with to provoke war, including false flag attacks (possibly nuclear) that implicate Iran.
Israeli belligerence towards Iran is "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." If the Israeli government believed they could get away with an attack on Iran without devastating consequences, they'd have done so after the US provided Israel with refueling aircraft and bunker buster bombs in 2010. Netanyahu's plan is to have the US bear all the casualties, costs, and consequences of attacking Iran, but that is obviously not going to work if the US makes peace with Iran. So the Israeli's will continue to do everything they can to prevent peace, and anything they believe they can get away with to provoke war, including false flag attacks (possibly nuclear) that implicate Iran.
Israeli belligerence towards Iran is "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." If the Israeli government believed they could get away with an attack on Iran without devastating consequences, they'd have done so after the US provided Israel with refueling aircraft and bunker buster bombs in 2010. Netanyahu's plan is to have the US bear all the casualties, costs, and consequences of attacking Iran, but that is obviously not going to work if the US makes peace with Iran. So the Israeli's will continue to do everything they can to prevent peace, and anything they believe they can get away with to provoke war, including false flag attacks (possibly nuclear) that implicate Iran.
Starting a war, for Israel has been, is and will be difficult for Israel. Mainly because the idea has to be ‘sold’ to most Israelis. They’re the tough market for they’ve seen the results of the last three outings against Gaza and Lebanon. The’ threat’ wasn’t there, as in past time,s and the performance left much to be desired. That ‘failure to win’ can be as bad as losing.Now there’s a real threat.
It would be far, far easier for Obama to order a pre-emptive Adler Tag. That has been Netanyahu’s objective all along.
Why cant we Nuke Israel???
While you'd be killing the Jews, you'd also be killing a bunch of Palestinians. Unlike Jewish blood, Palestinian blood is not cheap, which is why nuking Israel would be too risky.
Tell Israel if they attack, we attack them. enough said
This man and his entire Likud party run on the promise of NO PEACE with Iran or Palestine. They're aggressive hawks in search of TERRITORY. And to them, peace is a four-letter word. Chomsky speaks of the dialogue in Israel in many instances, saying that in Israel, they use the term 'peace offensive'. They SAY it's because those Iranians are just so damn sneaky (with all those inspectors running around…). In reality, however, peace means no more land for Israel. Their borders get fixed — and they no more want that than the USA did in the early 1800s.