Four or five thousand troops is a small footprint by US standards, where the really big wars usually involve ten or twenty times as many, but for AFRICOM, this is enough to cover several interventions at once.
The US “foothold” in Africa is small, to be sure, and spread across myriad different little intervention across the continent. This isn’t just a series of random conflicts, but part of a broader scheme to build relationships with the assorted African militaries and convince them to trust the US with a bigger role in years to come.
Most of the missions are small enough to avoid serious scrutiny at home, with President Obama’s decision to deploy ground troops to Uganda to hunt Joseph Kony barely a footnote in the US media, and the operation’s failure, now seemingly permanently stalled in the wake of the Central African Republic revolution, even less noteworthy.
Elsewhere in Africa, the goal seems to be mostly drones, with efforts to have US drones on hand to kill random threats to random governments likely to sell well in the regime-change cluttered region.
3 thoughts on “Many Small Missions, But Big Ambitions for US Military in Africa”
We said it from day one: Obama is elected for Africa, Libya war killing kaddafi was about Africa, so was the Balkan war to open a corridor into Caspian Sea.., and Libya to open a militaristic corridor into Africa.
USA and its government no matter the form or shape of it is not about democracy, never been and never will be…, unless the power of usa government is in hand of its people. The present us democracy is about militarism.., presents militarism and will work for militarizing the world.., usa it has been and it will be a militarism regime.
[moderator’s note: Who is this “we” you’re always referencing? – TLK]
We the people.
And the Fourth Reich continues its global conquest.
Comments are closed.