Citing the Syrian government’s capture of the border town of Qusayr, officials inside the Obama Administration sy that they believe the president is likely to approve a decision to start sending weapons to Syrian rebels later this week.
The White House has been threatening to do so for a long time, and with growing calls from hawks to get directly involved militarily, imposing “no-fly zones” and rebel buffer areas inside Syria, officials say throwing weapons at the rebels is being spun as a compromise decision at least a little short of direct acts of war.
But while the Obama Administration seems desperate to do “something” in Syria, the timing seems about as bad as possible, with officials going on the record favoring peace talks then watching as nominally pro-US rebels spurned the talks and started holding out for more guns.
Indeed, the State Department is so frustrated with the quality (or lack thereof) of the Syrian rebel leadership they’ve been stalling on sending them the huge amounts of cash they promised. If they are uncomfortable sending money, the problem of sending them guns seems even greater.
This little piggy went to the market.., this little piggy went to the market to look for the first piggy…, the vulture capitalism government dishonesty in a non ending story as, this piggy went to the market.
And then what.., another continues war.., like Afghanistan.
Apparently it doesn't matter if a group is affiliated with Al-Qaeda or other fundamentalist groups, uses child soldiers, engages in rape, torture, and mutilation, eats the body parts of prisoners, and regularly utilize car bombs, etc. & etc. ad nauseum–as long as you will do the US government's bidding they have some money for you! Meanwhile, there are people rotting in US prisons for years because they gave to a charity that may (or may not have) had dealings, no matter how small or diffuse, with an elected government in the middle east or some other group the US deems are 'terrorists'.
Obama is a coward and will always act like one. The russians have called his bluff in Syria, and now he's crying and threatening to call his buddies for help.
But obviously it's okay for a Peace-prize Nobel-Laureate to have other people die for him, as long as he doesn't have to steep into this bloody messs himself.
What a sorry wuss!
He and former US presidents did plan and create this bloody mess in Syria ! This from the beginning has been an "US Army unconventional warfare" with its Al Qaeda/AL CIAda proxy fighters.
Wake up and face reality:
condensed primer about Syria: http://08oo.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/key-reasons-…
How can a website calling itself antiwar posting such a picture of the most cruel living war criminal on earth?
Because of this? –>> http://colorrevolutionsandgeopolitics.blogspot.de…
http://08oo.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/antiwarst…
Will I be moderated? Is the Pope a Catholic?
This is all about busting the Assad regime for israel's benefit. First Syria and Hizbollah, then Iran. All for the zionist enterprise.
What disgusting hypocrite. _US Code – Section 2385§ 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government_Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government
One, I will not insult human intelligence, for those who have two brain cells to rub together, by calling these mass murderers "rebels". I shall refer to them by their proper nomenclature, and that is Al Qaeda terrorists, or as Webster Tarpley terms them, the CIA's Arab Legion or Al CIA-duh.
So President Obama, you and the rest of the asylum states government want to confiscate guns from the Amerikan people, but you want to arm the CIA's Arab Legion, or Al-CIA-duh? And anyone still delusional who thinks that Amerika has any "bright" future ahead…………………?
oops missed the word openly
With the NSA revelations, IRS foul-play, targeting of reporters, and general crumbling of his admin, maybe the president needs to change the subject by arming the Syrian 'rebels.' Remember the movie "Wag the Dog?"
I think all this posturing is just a poker game for Obama and whole his current government. Administration is now pretending they are in pains of directly arming international Sunni terorrists in Syria while they are doing it for years indirectly. They are crying loudly about supposedly terorrists not showing leadership (whatever they mean by that), while they already promissed them everything one day after announcing Russia – US deal on political solution of Syria in a warning to Assad. They stated openly if Geneva talks fail they are going to arm so called "rebels". Rebels choose to make the talks fail by not showing up – just to get what hey want the most – state of the art US arms to defeat Assad and bring his head to Obama and Netenyahoo. This bodes not very well for Israel, since these jihadists hate Jews far more then they hate Assad.
People STILL don't get it.
Arming the insurgents will NOT let them WIN. Just having anti-armor and anti-aircraft weapons does not result in an automatic win.
And if they don't WIN, THEN what is Obama going to do?
Answer: He has NO CHOICE but to implement an air campaign.
You CANNOT degrade the Syrian military missile arsenal WITHOUT an air campaign. And THAT is the goal of the exercise – as well to cover Israel's upcoming attack on Hizballah in Lebanon.
It's that simple.
Obama is merely proceeding step by step so he can claim that HE didn't START the Syrian war. Just as he is proceeding step by step with Iran sanctions so he can claim HE didn't start the Iran war.
Get it through your heads.