Even though the initial reports of a chemical weapon attack earlier this week in Syria were reported more or less as absolute fact by multiple media outlets, and different groups differed instead on how to spin it to their advantage, US officials say there almost certainly was no such attack at all.
US military officials familiar with the reported incident say that there are “strong indications” that no such weapon was used, and that the more evidence they get, the more convinced they are that whatever happened in Aleppo, it wasn’t a chemical weapons attack.
The initial Tuesday reports had both Syrian government officials and the rebels claiming that the other side had used a chemical weapon, but NATO says their radar doesn’t show a missile even being launched at the time, and while officials concede that “something went down,” it remains a mystery exactly what.
Hawks have been hoping this report could be parlayed into an excuse for intervention in Syria, and while they probably won’t changed their goal, it may force them to find a new excuse.
Says who now? Their retarded mercenary apes on the ground? Because the arsonist American regime was certainly not invited to make an investigation.
I wonder what Russia has in mind. It's theirs and China's to lose if they stand back and watch the world burn due to American and Israeli insanity.
Just an idea:
May be they are sure that when USA is ready and successful with using their cheap Jihadi proxy fighters and believe having under control their happy Sharia friends, Russia and China on the opposite side will be happy to sell those – possibly united – oil and money rich Islamic states their weapons to help them to over come USA/NATO domination?
There are many ways to do a chemical weapons attack without a missile, and if the rebels did it, it certainly would not be a missile. Their motive would be to pull in a powerful ally.
chemical weapons used in the minds of opposition and of course france & england
So NATO is using radar to show all missiles all the time???
What more NATO is using??
The Germans have a radio spy ship on the Syrian cost. As far I remember they can check any type of radio communication and are good in localizing sources.
So NATO is using radar to show all missiles all the time???
What more NATO is using??
Ditz…you're a moron…a completely hopeless retarded moron…
I am speechless at this time…
Ditz: you're a moron…a completely hopeless retarded moron…
I am speechless at this time…
Did Ditz change anything in his initial text?
Was it never mentioned that the aggressive gas (production gas-no military gas) was expected to come from a bombed factory ?
It also was not often reported here in EU alternative media. I guess it can be found at http://www.net-new-global.net
Was it never mentioned that the aggressive gas (production gas-no military gas) was expected to come from a bombed factory ?
It also was not often reported here in EU alternative media. I guess it can be found at http://www.net-new-global.net
Was it never mentioned that the aggressive gas (production gas-no military gas) was expected to come from a bombed factory ?
It also was not often reported here in EU alternative media. I guess it can be found at http://www.net-new-global.net
Was it never mentioned that the aggressive gas (production gas-no military gas) was expected to come from a bombed factory ?
It also was not often reported here in EU alternative media. I guess it can be found at http://www.net-new-global.net
Was it never mentioned that the aggressive gas (production gas-no military gas) was expected to come from a bombed factory ?
It also was not often reported here in EU alternative media. I guess it can be found at http://www.net-new-global.net
Was it never mentioned that the aggressive gas (production gas-no military gas) was expected to come from a bombed factory ?
It also was not often reported here in EU alternative media. I guess it can be found at http://www.net-new-global.net