Yesterday’s report of a chemical weapons strike in Syria included both rebels and government accusing the other side of launch the strike, and international groups doubting that anything happened at all.
Reluctant to let the truth get in the way of a good story, Britain and France have latched onto the claim however, and are insisting that the unconfirmed report is justification to start throwing weapons at the Syrian rebels en masse.
Of course, Britain and France have been pledging to arm the Syrian rebels for weeks before this news even broke, so it falls into the category of convenient excuse. The question is whether the rest of the EU, which was averse to the idea, will be swayed.
In the US the divide appears to be squarely along war-with-Syria lines, with hawks suggesting the report obliged the US to attack Syria, even though there is still no consensus on what, if anything, actually happened.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- US to Cut Some Somali Military Aid Over Misuse, Corruption - December 17th, 2017
- Sistani: Shi'ite Militias Should Remain as Part of Iraq's Security Services - December 17th, 2017
- Mounting Tensions Drive Arms Sales to Multi-Decade High - December 17th, 2017
- US Commandos Participate in Thousands of Afghan Ground Operations - December 17th, 2017
- Israeli Crackdowns, Arrests Fail to Stop Jerusalem Protests - December 17th, 2017