Yesterday’s report of a chemical weapons strike in Syria included both rebels and government accusing the other side of launch the strike, and international groups doubting that anything happened at all.
Reluctant to let the truth get in the way of a good story, Britain and France have latched onto the claim however, and are insisting that the unconfirmed report is justification to start throwing weapons at the Syrian rebels en masse.
Of course, Britain and France have been pledging to arm the Syrian rebels for weeks before this news even broke, so it falls into the category of convenient excuse. The question is whether the rest of the EU, which was averse to the idea, will be swayed.
In the US the divide appears to be squarely along war-with-Syria lines, with hawks suggesting the report obliged the US to attack Syria, even though there is still no consensus on what, if anything, actually happened.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Red Cross to Send 'Test Shipment' of Rice to Northern Yemen - August 16th, 2017
- Report: Saudis Increasing Yemen Airstrikes, Killing More Civilians - August 16th, 2017
- US: Saudi Arabia, Bahrain Fail to Respect Religious Freedom - August 16th, 2017
- In US-Backed Kurdish Invasion of Raqqa, Arab Allies Struggle to Find a Role - August 16th, 2017
- Syria Shifts War Focus to ISIS-Held Eastern Territory - August 16th, 2017