In an interview today with BBC1, British Army Chief of Staff General Sir David Richards said that the military is “continually” working on different plans for military intervention in Syria, raising the prospect of direct British military involvement.
Sir David suggested that the primary goal right now of British foreign policy was to keep the Syrian Civil War from spilling across any borders, so the most likely deployments would be along the Syrian border as a sort of quarantining measure.
They might deploy inside Syria, however, nominally on humanitarian grounds. He insisted any deployment would be “limited” and that the military would be “very cautious” about getting too deeply involved in the ugly civil war.
The general also discussed the possibility of attacking Iran, saying that so long as Prime Minister David Cameron keeps “all options” on the table related to Iran that the military is obliged to prepare for the possibility he’s going to up and order an attack some day. Sir David seemed even less interested in this war, however, saying an attack on Iran was “fraught with risk.”
10 thoughts on “British Army Chief: Deploying Troops to Syria Being Constantly Considered”
The colonial war is here and is healthy as a dinky donkey on the march, the plan for UK sending its war machinery onto Syrian border is act in war and invasion of a sovereign country,although the Neo liberal fascism, as the name says it loud and clear, that they never have respected any laws or for that matter the human integrity yet it is clear what they after, whom they support and what's behind their happy face.
They simply want to implement their idea in democracy saving the tyranni of Saudis even if it taks them to knock on the Third World War, then lets be it, to he'll with you, you are not going to be the people government anyway. And for you peopl.., You have seen nothing yet, you haven't seen the ingrediance in what is cooking in white and black house. Wake up democrats, wake up people…, is about time for you to realize the fact that once again you did vote for yet another war agendas written and planed by the father of all Zionism in America Paul Wolfowitz.
Same in Germany – we have in our constitution that attack wars are forbidden and have ten years prison sentence for those promoting war. Nevertheless the attack war against Yugolslavia and the German participation in international troops to attack in Mali are not sentenced.
Law means nothing for a corrupt justice system and media provides the brainwash.
Even is "rebellion" or "civil war" is a theater piece of NATO media, in reality it can be proofed that it is an USA/NATO/Saudi undercover proxy guerrilla war:
You have a problem in Europe and that is the growth of Economic Neo Liberal Fascism with Angela Markell on top of French Social Democrats and on top of these two is Divid Cameron of England and then comes the Swedish monarchs and the Swedish Neo Liberal Fascism.
This New trend in politics started by the right wing within the Social democrats who paved the way for these Neo Liberals to take over from 2006, they were so happy yet surprised asking themselves the question.., these idiots doing what we are supposed to do.., the one who supported the balkan war supporting the Paul Wolfowitz idea is the Social democrats in Europe then is, Tony Blair and Bill Clinton colonial agendas in occupying the entire central Asia by the way of Balkan.., look at the world map closely.., and now they are after northern part of Persian Gulf. Here, Hitler didn't succeed because he went the wrong way, he chose Russia, this Neo Liberal Fascist entities doing it the right way by going into Balkan and now Persian Gulf wanting to occupy the entire region.., it is a Neo Fascism war and there is no question about it, they even have said that King of Sweden and his personal and economic activity is connected to this Neo born economic Mafia in Europe, I call it vulture capitalism, they never respect any laws and they never will, is up to the people in Europe and US to wake up and smell the bad stuff cooking for them.
Why is a British general wearing US general's stars on his uniform? Has NATO gone ahead and fully integrated the British and US Armies? They might as well at this point. It's probably more appropriate for all of them to be integrated into the IAF, since that's who they're really fighting wars for and the fact neither army is defending their own country anymore.
"He insisted any deployment would be “limited” and that the military would be “very cautious” about getting too deeply involved in the ugly civil war."
Then what are you doing there? What kind of jughead mentality says we should send troops to other people's countries but not get involved? Here's an idea that you and the Americans will never consider…mind your own damn business!
don't worry they've got a mandate
The jobless UK people they produced are made for such reasons.
Despite the much cheaper mercenaries and criminals from Arab countries, the allowance, given to them by clerics, for looting and taking women,and the thousands who are coming over any border surrounding Syria, it even is not sufficient killing and destruction. May be some potential fighters learned that they are dying like rabits.
Any criminal of the Arab world sees its chance there, to get rich by looting and salary. But they still need UK soldiers – to reduce the jobless and rise the turnover of the defense industry.
Surprised it's not the French, wanting their old colony back.
What a joke both NATO, and the US have become to the civilized multi-polar world that is taking shape with the BRICS nations, and non-aligned movement. Does the UK, or NATO not think that Russia, and China will not respond?? These countries "need" to put the old colonial states in their place.
Ew!! Fraught with risk, how British! Chin up lad it's on to the apocalypse!
Comments are closed.