As the Eid al-Adha holiday comes to a close, so does Syria’s pledge four-day ceasefire, with the war ratcheting back up on both sides. Not that this “last day” of the ceasefire really registered as one.
Rather, after heavy fighting in several parts of the country on Sunday (day 3), no one seems to have honored day 4 at all, and it was just another day of the protracted and ever-escalating Syrian Civil War.
Fighting is back up to “normal” in Syria with the rebels looking to increase their gains in the far north of the nation and the military increasingly reliant on air strikes with 60 different air strikes reported today alone.
With the four-day ceasefire over, getting maybe two days of reduced fighting out of it, the factions are returning to the status quo, which is this case means trading blame over whose fault the ceasefire’s failure actually is.
Look, Syrian government only uses 1/3 of its military hitting these bandits where ever they try to hide, if it was not for the flow of barbarians from Europe or Jordan and turkey, if it was not for the support by the Europeans and us Neo liberal fascism there wouldn't be any war in Syria, if it was not for the Swedish Neo liberal fascist producing these barbarians in stockholm or for that matter the Germans and England production of these jihadist and other type of barbarians, there wouldn't be any war in Syria, if it was not for the tyrant – monarchs family in Europe who support Saudis and their barbarians there wouldn't be any war in Syria. The idea behind all this is a madness, an idiocy by those who think their forigen politics is about democracy, not knowing that democracy is a home grown, you can not force a falsified democracy, a non functioning entity of vulture capitalism doing everything possible to keep the system.
I'll repeat Ditz:
The "rebels" obviously have no "game plan" other than to incite direct military "intervention" from the outside… Unless they are retarded (which they could very well be), I would assume these fools know by now they can't "win"–if "winning" is defined as toppling the Assad regime…or, at the very least, to kill Assad.
If the goal is to kill Assad, why isn't there a serious coordinated effort to go after Assad and the bulk of the "regime" (as it is typically implicitly defined) directly in Damascus where Assad and the bulk of the "Regime" is actually located? Car bombs aren't going to do it..and are just turning more and more of the population against them (any of the 'population' that isn't already 'against' them (the "rebels") now, that is–which I would guess is the majority of the "Syrian people" anyway).
Unlike a foreign "occupation", the Assad "Regime" can't/won't just pack up and return 'home'–because they are "home"…
Obviously the "rebels" had no incentive to "ceasefire" (if their aim was outside military "intervention"–especially if they have been given some sort of assurances) and were the likely instigators and culprits of "breaking" it…after they sent the several 'terrorist' car-bombs as reported of course…
If anyone seriously thinks these "rebels" can "win" on their own, tell me: what exactly is the "game plan"/"strategy" of the "Rebels" here?