A purported massacre by the Syrian army near Hama on Thursday has turned out to be a battle between government forces and armed rebel militias, in another example of Western leaders hyping Syrian rebel propaganda.
After the battle, online videos and news reports detailed the heavy casualties sustained by the rebel forces making it out to be a massacre of mostly unarmed opposition members by Syrian forces. Spokesmen for the opposition claimed the number of dead to be as high as 250, prompting Western leaders like Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to express “outrage.”
New details of the incident, however, reveal the death count to have been much less, around 100. Almost all of those killed were men of military age who were armed and engaged in a battle with government forces.
“Although what actually happened in Tremseh remains murky,” reports the New York Times, “the evidence available suggested that events on Thursday more closely followed the Syrian government account.” That is, a battle between regime forces and rebel militias, rather than a slaughter of unarmed civilians, as was claimed by the opposition and subsequently touted by Western officials.
This kind of lying and false propaganda has become routine in the US and UK. If these regimes were capable of it they would be ashamed of themselves. As it is they just try again. Difficult to believe how low the West has become in terms of moral status….and it could get a lot worse. There is a particular arrogance and hubris that has spread through these countries that makes them more and more dismissive of the rights of others. This seems to have grown particularly marked in the last decade.
There you go Hillary Clinton.., be outrage by it. Your sorceress in Syrian war are nothing but bunch of lier as US and EU, Saudis and UAE governments are, there is nothing in this world that capitalism and its supported barbarians would not do to discredit a truth.
"sorceress" — a very accurate typo.
So what really happened near Hama turns out, isn't as reported by MSM. Madam SecState Shrill Harpy, would do well to keep her braying to herself. Turns out, the only "outrage" would be the galling hypocrisy of Madam SecState.
The "Free Syrian Army" must not have been able to find any civilians to kill and arrange for the photo op. You know how al-CIA-da works, I wonder what went wrong for them.
shrill-ery was less outraged at bill-ery
The surprise being? How many times have we been fed a diet of lies by the MSM and government shills?
Yet this won't make the evening news, to get a more correct picture out about the incident – having the Syrian government NOT cast as The Bad Guy just doesn't fit the official story.
You're right John.
The top news headline on Yahoo News and Reuters is still trumpeting a "massacre" reported by "activists." They now claim that the UN Observers back the "activist" claims (Note" the UN observers are taking what the rebels are telling them at face value without an iota of skepticism). Why does the media continue referring to these thugs as "activists?" I mean really. It's "reporting" like this that shows just how much disgust the media has for its readers and the truth.
The media is simply reflecting who and what they really work for. Criminals all…
Same old crapola. Our government lies and convinces the dim bulbs here that this "atrocity" occurred.
What does the Apartheid State of Israel have to say about this?
Israel doesn't need to actually speak out on this – like any skilled ventriloquist, they have learned to get their message out via the moving lips of the dummies sitting on their lap.
I hope there was a massacre but that of AlQaeda, CIA, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, French, British and American puppets
When the news first appeared on this site I commented: Tell it to the marines, which is another way of saying I'm from Missouri, you gotta show me.
When the NY Times, starts to acknowledge that the Syrian government may be right, then you know the facts are compelling in favor of the government, and the U.S. State Department is losing credibility in its propaganda war.
If the U.S. however goes off the deep end and actually initiates military action or gives the go-ahead to NATO, Obama will lose even more critical support among the Vietnam generation who were a very strong component of his base in 2008, even though Romney would be worse on the same issue. As for Hillary, the sooner she leaves, the better. The woman may be cutting many deals in secret (an alleged but bogus reason for prosecuting Assange), but she is clueless about the major diplomatic opportunities or how to deal with other nation states without shooting herself in the foot with her
cultural biases.
I am not an expert of military "terms of art"; however, I would assume NATO Strike Sorties qualify as "heavy weapons". I also don't remember any condemnation of the "freedom fighters" in Libya using tanks against their government and their "own people" at the time. Additionally, I don't recall much condemnation of the Libyan "freedom fighters" sodomizing their Head of State with a machete and mysteriously shooting him in the head on his way to a detention center… I do remember a quick blurb by the DOS stating the incident was 'troubling' and/or 'disturbing…followed by a speech from Barack Obama who proclaimed his Adminstriation had "brought freedom"…followed up with a: "we came, we saw, he died", with chucking, interview by Mrs. Clinton…
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20123348-5…
So what exactly is Mrs. Clinton proposing now?
What exactly has Mr. Assad done "wrong"???
I would love logical answers to these 'questions'…
I would also like to know why this declaration of "freedom bringing" was done after things like the following were happening (which were known by Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama before their interviews and speeches proclaiming: 'freedom bringing accomplished'):
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaa…
The sad part is where they used to use "atrocities" to spur the gullible into supporting the decision to go to war…now, with the evidence indicating the gullible are tired of being manipulated with lies and generally don't care anymore…the Archons now only need the "atrocities" to justify their actions in the history books. They no longer need the approval or compliance of the gullible.
"What exactly has Mr. Assad done "wrong"??? "
Resisting the Empire.
It is identical to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, thevariousvictim statesweresupposedto surrneder andnot resist as theNazis marched in.
"How dare they resist, they have no right…", this poem is still as good as when in 1920
Hillary Clinton does a good Reichmarshal Goering in Drag impression.
It is to frighten the Russians and prepare foolish Western Liberals war.
This is the old Atrocity technique, but one question I have is how it got got out in advance before the facts were known.
Because the decision was taken in 2002 and 2005 by the Neo-Cons, and vast amounts of money put in to programmes, so the Obama-Clinton regime simply continued them, esoecially as Hillary Clinto is the world's No.1 Liberal Imperialist.