In an interview today with German television, Syrian President Bashar Assad condemned the US, saying their policies were destabilizing Syria by providing political protection for “gangs” in the international community.
Assad went on to condemn Saudi Arabia and Qatar for their role in arming rebel factions, which he called “terrorists” in keeping with the official Syrian state media term for them, while faulting Turkey for providing them with logistical support.
He insisted he remained confident in enjoying domestic support, however, saying “The US are against me, the West is against me, numerous regional powers and countries are against me, if the people were also against me, then how could I still be in my position?”
Assad still enjoys considerable support from both Russia and China, which have blocked calls for a UN resolution forcing him from office, and long-time ally Iran. The civil war in the country has grown continually worse over the past few weeks, with rebel factions taking several towns after abandoning the UN-brokered ceasefire.
To be fair, whatever Mr Assad said in that interview was the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help him God.
…………………
This just in from "Dear Leader.com"–your daily source of benevolence and 'peace' throughout the world:
The Imperialist Assad regime has continued "crackdowns" by killing it's "own people", who are also "peaceful protesters".."peaceful protesters" who are allegedly " taking several towns after abandoning the UN-brokered ceasefire"–according to Dear Leader.
The arrogant Imperial Assad, the 'leader' of this closed, totalitarian, regime had the audacity to appear in an "interview" conducted by the 'British Broadcasting Corporation' and called these "peaceful protesters" "terrorists"… we all know what that means (wink wink)… The gall of this man to appear in an "interview" on the BBC only confirms the brutal, indignant, tyrannical nature of this man… It is also a clear indication he has sex slaves (prepubescent girls to be specific) locked up in his basement he repeatedly rapes on a daily basis–behind his wife's back I might add–before he cuts their throats and throws them in the gutter…
Have no fear though: the "peaceful protesters" are closing in on this Tyrant by way of their "peaceful" activities; despite the fact this pompous Dictator is being 'propped up' by the tyrannical forces of Red China and Russia and, of course, the "terrorist" loving and sponsoring Iranian regime…and despite the fact this deranged fool is wasting precious time and resources by: "beginning a new round of military exercises today meant to ready the nation for a possible attack" (the details of which can be found in a separate article published by DL.C today). He's clearly in his "final throes"…clearly…
As a footnote, to be 'clear': Dear Leader.com does not advocate or endorse violence in any way against this Imperial brutal murderer and pedophile rapist… That would just be silly…
http://cdn2.all-art.org/Visual_History/world_wars…
All that you have wrote belong exclusively to the dung heap of yankee history
Lol. That was good satire.
The above post just about sums it up, but Obama isunlikely to take the title of dear leader but Obama Caesar.
However, even in this situation antiwar.com continues to support the official Narrative that this is a Civil War, which it is not.
Yeah… And a lot of people view this as "warmongering". I can't come to another logical conclusion. Even though many may mean well, and their intentions may be the exact opposite (the opposite of warmongering that is), it's important to realize Assad is most likely not going anywhere anytime soon (elections/no-elections)–absent significant 'military intervention' by the US and/or NATO. There isn't a shred of real 'evidence' which would indicate otherwise. If there is, I'd be interested in knowing what it may be; however, I certainly haven't seen any. Buying into this line that he's "on his way out" (which is not grounded in reality or supported by 'facts') and/or "needs to go" feeds into the rhetoric of those who want war with Syria.
Additionally: this is not 'our' business to begin with. Syria belongs to the "Syrian people"–at least I think it 'should'. The "Syrian people" will resolve this "conflict" in their own way–unless the US and/or NATO or other powers take over militarily–but even if they do "take over", the "Syrians" will ultimately "resolve" this–absent foreign ground forces in an "occupation" type situation. 'We' have our own problems–to say the least–which have not quite been "resolved"–and they seem to be getting worse relatively quickly–which require "our" attention. How anyone could come to the conclusion they would have a good sense of what will solve the "issues" in Syria, if the 'issues' at home are spiraling out of control is beyond me…
Also, all these fake "diplomacy" games are not quite what they seem. The 'intentions' and 'agendas' are certainly not what they portray themselves as at a superficial level. There may be well intentioned people involved in all of this who simply want to "end the violence"–simply to end it; however, these people (if they are even involved in the first place) are not 'driving' most of this–and are certainly not the the "deciders" so to speak. I'm sure most know this, but some seem to think this is just something that can be changed by changing the "players". It is not–this is just how people are. Diplomats are always the front line in war between nations. Their main function is to "set the stage" of the conflict and rally political support from other powers, as well as drum up political support for the conflict domestically. This is how it is now, and this is how its always been.
"All for the sake of israel"
Ms. Clinton and the Obama administration are following the recommendations made originally in the Clean Break report.
Back in 1996, a group of leading neoconservatives led by Richard Perle drafted a memorandum for then (as now) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, recommending that Israel adopt a more aggressive and assertive policy towards its neighbors. They called it a "Clean Break" to suggest that it would be a major shift in policy. Today, as American foreign policy looks more like a shipwreck than a victory lap, there is perhaps a need for a Clean Break by Washington.
The Study Group was led by Former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle as the "Study Group Leader", but the final report included ideas from James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Robert Loewenberg, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.
The plan proposed new policies:
1. Rather than pursuing a "comprehensive peace" with the entire Arab world, Israel should work to "contain, destabilize, and roll-back" those entities that are threats.
SYRIA was specifically noted as a challenge to Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon. And that Israel can shape its strategic environment, by focusing on removing Saddam Hussein from power in IRAQ.— an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling SYRIA's regional ambitions.
May Hezbollah,Iran with Syria, and Russian backing thwart all terrorist atempts by the West to take over the middle east. The West opperates with a reckless abandon, and cares nothing about human rights, the UN, or international law for that matter. Their defeat is a must.
Here it is folks;-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New…
This is frightening stuff.
Barak Obama HAS adopted Neo-Con policies.
Who is lying to you?
Bashar Assad or Hillary Clinton?