The relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan has been problematic for years, but lately it has taken on new attributes that liken the two to enemies instead of reluctant partners.
The U.S. drone strikes, the espionage and infiltration, the killing of 24 Pakistani soldiers in a botched airstrike in November have all contributed to a growing wrangle between Washington and Islamabad. But the Obama administration’s recent overtures to Pakistan’s arch enemy, India, seem to have made things even worse.
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta went to India recently to speak about improving relations with the Asian country and reportedly made condescending remarks about keeping Islamabad in the dark about U.S. actions, like the raid on Osama bin Laden’s home, for example.
Just days after Panetta’s India trip, UN human rights chief Navi Pillay met with Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani who claimed that the U.S. drone war violates human rights and Pakistani sovereignty. Pillay then immediately called for a UN investigation into civilian casualties in the U.S. drone war, something the Obama administration has tried very hard to avoid by lying about the true nature of the program and keeping it secret and run by the CIA, as opposed to by the military where it might have to be held accountable.
The latest arguments in recent days are focusing on accusations from Panetta and others in Washington that Pakistan provides safe haven to terrorists, a charge Pakistan has bitterly denied.
Panetta “is oversimplifying some of the very complex issues we are dealing with in our efforts against extremism and terrorism,” the Foreign Ministry said. “We strongly believe that such statements are misplaced and unhelpful in bringing about peace and stability in the region.”
A senior U.S. official described the relationship as “the worst it has ever been.”
“This is from Washington’s point of view and from Pakistan’s point of view, and even among the real well-wishers on both sides who are appalled and befuddled that we can’t get past all of this and move beyond,” said the official, speaking to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity.
does anyone wonder what would happen if this alliance actually disintegrated
Pak insiders would then actually expose the facts about the OBL assassination and the origins of alCIAeda. The worst outcome for NATO policy is if Pak actually took a position on the most consistent lie of Israel's legitimacy, Israel being the chief underwriters of US policies. Could Pak actually line up with Turkey and militarily breach Israels borders.
Whatever you wrote Sir,Pakistan has the least apitite for anything that is related to Israel.Israel for one and only one thing is an emeny to herself,the way it has been driving things around.Let the west get more and more educated about what Israel is really upto.the East will be spared to do anything about it at once.
Pakistan has only one problem that is totally internal.BAD GOVERNANCE.once we get control over it.we will be better able to deal with the over whelming lies the USG has been telling to the world.WOT,ALCIADA,OBL…just wait all be exposed soon.
In Pakistan we have our own culprit in all sects of Govt and we will deal with them soon.Pakistan and Pakistani people need no enimousoty with no none.we are as much interested to live in peace as much any dick,tom and harry wish to.
please explain. you have the military which has largely towed its dependence on US aid, most of the military elite received fellowship by US UK military
then you have the parasitic feudal elite who have no interest in protecting the masses; feasting on the population like Lord of the Flies. Just imagine one Tunisian fruit vendor could actually begin an uprising. What happened to pak and where will governance come from with the security thugs even stronger than sukarnos indonesia
No crazy talk please………
idiot
"Could Pak actually line up with Turkey and militarily breach Israels borders."
Ah ANTIWAR.COM
haha
the US is actually in bigger problems because it is a CIA controlled activity, technically every one of the CIA operatives involved are in fact Terrorists, the definition of Terrorism fits a Non uniformed Group who attack civilians, this also technically makes the US state sponsors of Terrorism.
"Bothched"? As I recall, the U.S. attack on Pakistani forces continued far to long for that word to be appropriate.
As for the larger issue, 30 years of lies hold the two nations together, beginning with the Reagan Administration's decision to let Pakistan acquire nuclear weapons and right on through the planning for the 9/11 operation.
97% of Pakistan hates Americans — Long time in the making
Since the 1950’s our Empire has been bribing the rich ruling class of Pakistan, by billions upon billions each year, and during that time, because of hunger such corruption causes, the height of their laboring-class has been slowly shrinking with the babies being born stunted.
Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Imran Khan Unless he turns to be a NWO Trojan Horse like our "O"
The U.S. has shown either a rank inability or lack on interest, or both in trying to understand and accomodate Pakistan's core interests- e.g. re: Kashmir- and how the freedom fighters in Afghanistan (aka the "terrorists") factor into their struggle with India. Also, any moron should know (though Clinton and Panetta seem to beyond help, especially with their threats and mocking disdain) that sending in drones that kill Pakistan's citizens and consistently violating Pakistan's territorial sovereignty both in the border areas with Afghanistan and in Baluchistan, will eventually convince it to seek the "help" it has received from the U.S. from someone else, and what do you know?- they are now looking to the Chinese. It is probably best for us as well that we leave the area entirely, unless we can offer something better than death and death threats on a criminal scale.
Romney will probably keep on doing the same (especially if, or rather when, he gets advice from
Bolton, et al) but it is time Obama is shown the door rather than given a mandate to continue doing the same.