The first round of P5+1 talks with Iran may have been constructive, according to those involved, but don’t try telling the US Senate that as senators from both parties are pushing forward with calls for yet more sanctions against Iran.
Sen. Mark Kirk (R – IL) insisted that it was unreasonable to “mistake positive diplomatic dialogue for compliance,” and he, along with Sen. Robert Menendez (D – NJ), the co-sponsors of a December sanctions bill, are hoping to have another round pushed through Congress very soon.
The two were hoping to see the sanctions added to a new round of shipping sanctions already proposed on Iran, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D – NV) insisted that they couldn’t add them and had to propose them separately.
Obama had also expressed support for additional sanctions in the wake of the first round of talks, insisting that they couldn’t be allowed to continue “indefinitely” and that more sanctions were coming soon.
These senators do not represent the American people or America's economic or strategic interest. What they are "lapdogs for the criminal AIPAC, and ZOA. Americans need to wake up and purge every senator who acts like a terrorist, and who is a terrorist at heart.
Correct. Many Senators are afraid of their keeping their seats (the job). It is US sovereignty and keeping with the US Constitution matters. These are acts of war, like Ron Paul has pointed out. The Constitution of the US states has to be followed. Barrak Obama did not follow the Constitution and violated the War Powers Resolution (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution).
When they sense that they can resist AIPAC, things will change.
Although they look alike, but then you have democrats whom are for wars, wanting more sanctions before the war with Iran and they also can be republicans. So when we say that every president have to have a war under his name we are correct, because, every president acts differently yet following the past president path for another war. Bush went to Iraq, he got the vote of democrats and republicans yet the Iraq war was illegal, Obama is taking a bigger step wanting to change the regimes in Syria and Iran and if he could the China, North Korea, South America, Entire Africa and possibly Pakistan and Russia, he is engaged everywhere making things messier as it is using Tyrants and Terrorists from everywhere and of everything but he dose it slowly. He is a relaxed, lied back kind of guy but he wants war no matter what, he don't say it but Hillary Clinton do the talking instead.
Question is: what would come out of all that NOT KNOWING DEMOCRATIC _ Republicans politics. Would it end up with peace or just another war with yet another nation in Middle east. My guess is that Hillary, on the party level, will vote for war with anyone and everyone no matter who they are and what they are, if you ask me I would say she can start with Turkey and then move south, or start with invading Syria and then go north fighting the Russian first and then south again fighting Iranian, and so on and so fourth. Thats the Democratic party war plan being very ambition about it.
Here we go again. AIPAC is pushing Congress into more diplomatic belligerence. The war drums are pounding.
Bunch of bl..dy shi.he.ds. Stick your sanctions up your back sides, Iran will be happy to provide oil fro lubrication. People like you have destroyed the peace and harmony in the world that was achieved through great many sacrifices.
Negotiations be damned…!! All engines ahead top speed. Never mind those icebergs.
And a big BAANG to destroy the whole world.
And God will create onother World with one loving people.
US wants more wars of aggression – driven by those who know they won't personally be affected, financially or otherwise.
driven by those who know they won't personally be affected, financially or otherwise.'
Sorry to disagree but our elected officials always profit from the inside information and wars they stated. Dick Cheney took 5 hardship deferments to avoid the conflict in Vietnam. When he left office his financial reporting has him with over $200,000,000 in the bank. Take 5 million for haliburton and you have 195 million as a poor public servant. Of course most of Dicks money came from his advance information of changes in our military. Most of the changes he directed when he work in the department of defense during Reagans administartion.
How may kids did those sanctions kill today?
Iran is not a threat to the US. Its crime is that it refuses to submit to US domination.
Actually Iran is blocking the Israel from moving into Lebanon and getting the water from the latavi river. Israel has been a very wasteful nation and it never planned for a major drought. They find themself in need of a lot of water and armed organization group called hezbollah. Last attack on Hezbollah resulted in massive losses of Israel Tanks. The ground tropps were never advanced due to the loss of tanks. The IDF does not like to attack armed forces. So as long as Iran supplies hezbollah the taking of the Latavni is going to be expensive.
Are these warmongers Christians?
Jews a smokescreen for Nazi Germany — Jews a smokescreen for Empire USA
FICTION
Rubin
“These senators…are lapdogs for the criminal AIPAC”
FACTS
(1) In 1945 our corporate rich created Empire USA by ordering paid actor Truman to nuke 220,000 civilians in Japan, thereby terrorizing the entire world into fearful submission.
(2) In 1948 our corporate rich ordered their paid actor politicians to create the terrorist state of Israel, the purpose being to maximize the profits in trading Middle-East oil for war materials made in USA.
(3) The vast majority in the upper half of USA society, they are in full agreement with the Bush-Obama Administration, they being the 50% most educated and wealthy, they being a voting monopoly that strives to impoverish the lower half of society with a starvation minimum wage, they having a dictator mentality that loves to plunder the world by brutal imperialism and wars of aggression.
FICTION Rubin “These senators…are lapdogs for the criminal AIPAC”
Fiction?? how so when it is AIPAC that determines which congressman, or senator will be elected based upon his/her devotion to the "zionist entity"? AIPAC is just like Al Queda, the Nazi Party, and any group whose sole purpose is to terrorize, and cause war's for a self serving cause. AIPAC's cause is the "zionist entity" or better known as occupied Palestine.
Quoting from Sen. Kirk: '… to mistake positive diplomatic dialogue to compliance'. Compliance to what ? They have no nukes, no nuke program, nothing has been found despite the scrutiny and probable spying by (US) agents on inspection teams. Compliance to Israeli paranoia ? Compliance to shadows, prejudices, suspicions, superstitions, pre-judgments ?
Compliance with every order from the Washington empire.
These senators (and the President) are terrorists, and should be treated as such. We should start referring to Obama as a child murderer, since so many hundreds of innocent children have been murdered by his approved drone attacks, combined with his approval of sanctions against other countries.
Read the history of US war mongering policies toward nations around the world, is long, is very long.
No matter who was or has or is the president and what party (Democrats or Republican) they present, US have had a war with someone, now if is a “cold war” or war in realtime is been a war, US simply is addicted in being a war junky.
If people in Iran want to have a religious regime is not the US business, nor is god given right to demand for this regime or any other to be changed, if Vietnamese people want to be ruled by communism then it is their given rights, here the meaning and the very basics in democracy is based on majority and majority rule, the Syrian people want to keep their regime as it is, so is the fact with any other country.
By US or NATO being involved in wars first and then demanding for changes is nothing but a non democratic, a falsified democracy based on a falsified demand and show of the militarism that US and EU have build up for last 40 − 50 years which have made these regimes a militarism regime.
Each and every US and EU wars based on what US – EU wants and what US have found along the path of wars to lie about democracy. US simply has given the meaning of the word “Democracy" a bad name, US have no rights to use tyrants, dictatorial regimes and then wanting to implement its “democracy" somewhere els, that is not democracy, that is a falsified, double language and double standard political system period.
In terms of US or EU (England – France) economical interests all these wars are about a highway rubbery with gun pointed at peoples head, or defending a tyranny or a dictatorial regimes, as is happening in Syria: Loo there is no democracy in US nor is happening in EU, these “democratic” regimes are at wars because they are losing their power to people around the world, what they do in return, they enforce police state at home, handcuffing a 6 years old girl in Virginia taking her to police station jailing her while calling for other nation to respect the human rights, creating wars based on allegations and lies while maintaining their militarism support for terrorists, Tyrants and dictators.
These senators are in business creating a dictatorship at home, these senators are lapdogs for and to implement such regimes at home and AIPAC have a hand in this creation, after all is a Zionist entity, created by Zionism.
Close the Democratic party, there is no democracy coming out of this party, is nothing but another war institution, a political entity depending on its militarism then being able to constitute the meaning of the word or for that matter for democracy to function, being able to explain the basics in democracy, respecting its principals or having it function for the people, is a corrupt system lead by the falsified democrat and republican senators alike.
Hoiw abut the Zionist Israel first TRAITORS to America in our Congress ALL be deported to Israel.
How much financial support do these Congressmen and women receive from the various Political Action Committees? Is there an official record available to the public?
Can the voter determine exactly how much his/her candidate has received in monetary election support from action committees like e.g. AIPAC, prior to voting?
We all know that the solicitation letters from our Congressmen and women go out furiously prior to any major election, begging and pleading for their financial support in return for which they pledge their souls and first-borns to the well-being iof Israel.
It is time for a serious term limitations debate. Let's put it to a national referendum and short-circuit the black mailing PACs. Let the taxpayer speak up.
More sanctions>less oil availability perception>higher prices>higher oil company profits>higher bribes to U.S. senators>more efficient sucking, louder mewling and higher knees in prancing by congress.
When are we ever going to have a President we can point to proudly and say that he never got us into a war? When will being a "War President" be a mark of shame?