Less than a week ago officials reported that the latest round of super-secret talks with the Taliban were nearing a potential breakthrough. As it so often has in the past, the deal has collapsed, with officials blaming President Hamid Karzai.
The deal was supposed to involve some sort of trade where President Obama would transfer five Gitmo detainees to house arrest in Qatar in return for unspecified concessions from the Taliban. Karzai was said to have objected to the deal, and it collapsed shortly thereafter.
“Right now, things have stopped,” a top US official is quoted as saying, and officials say they expect another effort at talks with the Taliban some time after the new year.
Several previous “deals” have also ended in failure, in many cases with the revelation that the “Taliban” they were talking to didn’t have any ties to the actual Taliban. In one case in 2010, it was revealed that the “Taliban” they were courting were scam artists looking to bilk NATO out of cash.
17 thoughts on “US Latest ‘Deal’ With Taliban Collapses”
&&&&&&&&&&&&& They DID bilk NATO/U.S out of LOTS of CASH….. "Taliban impostor 'dupes Afghans and vanishes with cash' See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-118185…
Tell me what U think…..!!!!!
PS Aren't these colonial crusaders sent to us by Allah for us to fleece…..???????
Spc. Mikayla Bragg of the US army was reported killed in Khwost province Dec. 21. She is the tenth US soldier to die in Afghanistan in December and more than 400 US soldiers have died so far in 2011.
Mikayla's death was unfortunate and unnecessary. No American's should be killed fighting wars that advantage only the loathsome rich and the power hungry.
It is the rich and power hungry who should be being killed so that, eventually, none of them exist.
ah…. part of your "genetic cleansing program," no doubt, eh david?
Are YOU, david, ready to pull some triggers? Or are you to be, instead, indeed, and In Deed, the Intellectual and Spiritual Advisor and Wizard to the Grunts?
Humans could do with a bit of genetic cleansing, jg. We are a motley lot at the best of times and, if we are left to our own devices, we will destroy ourselves. Is it not better to take our flaws out of the equation so there can be peace on Earth?
"Humans could do with a bit of genetic cleansing….."
Can you explain how this idea of "genetic cleansing" is at all different from Himmler's "Final Solution," other than that THIS TIME, it would be being done for a Noble, Just, and Righteous Reason and would, of course, be directed by people such as yourself?
I've already asked you the following Questions about your plan and program for "genetic cleansing" on your blog, and they bear repeating here:
"Who is going to be in charge of this re-engineering of humanity? Who is qualified to do this? How many billions of humans will need to be disposed of for this concept to be implemented? And who is going to determine who is to live and who is to die, who is to be sterilized and who impregnated? And on what basis will these decisions be made? And on what basis will they determine which genes need to be engineered and how, and what type and intensity of pacification is to be implemented? Etcetcetc etal."
"Several previous “deals” have also ended in failure, in many cases with the revelation that the “Taliban” they were talking to didn’t have any ties to the actual Taliban. In one case in 2010, it was revealed that the “Taliban” they were courting were scam artists looking to bilk NATO out of cash." Lol.
MAN — MORE INTELLIGENT THEN NATURE
DavidGrayling — “Humans could do with a bit of genetic cleansing… if we are left to our own devices, we will destroy ourselves… genetic engineering could get rid of all abnormalities in human.”
JG Moebus — “Who is going to be in charge of this re-engineering of humanity? Who is qualified to do this?”
There are two types of people in this world,
GRATEFUL FEW — those most respectful of nature, realizing that life is a free gift from nature, and that everything we own belongs to those who have less then us. Which is why with great pleasure do they always give all they can give.
INGRATE MAJORITY — those who have nothing but contempt for nature, so ingrate as to fantasize that they deserve life, it being an “unalienable right” due and owed to them by nature. So, they have no choice but to be convicted that they also deserve the food and wealth needed to live. Which then gives them no choice but to have conviction that they deserve to “Be All You Can Be,” to earn all you can earn, take all you can take, own all you can own and to be a dictator over all who are on land that you own.
Amplifying my previous response:
You forgot the NARCISSISTIC MORALIZERS — Those that try to convince everyone that they, the virtuous Moralizers, are the "grateful few" that are fit to enslave, exterminate, tax, and ethnically and genetically cleanse the rest of us, the "ingrate majority."
MAN NEEDS MORE KNOWLEDGE? — MAN NEEDS A MIRACLE?
So, if we humans all had conviction that this day of life was more then we deserved, would we not be so grateful as to give all we could give? Surely, for if we do not deserve this life, then everything we own belongs to nature and most guilty would everyone feel it ever they failed to give everything they had to those who have less.
But then, no one would have a freewill. For everyone would be a slave to good, conscience and emotions could not endure the stress of desiring anything but good, and in all the world every inclination of the hearts of man would be only good all the time.
Problem is, what is good? Well, ask any Muslim, Christian or Jew and they will tell you the Ten Commandments proclaimed by Moses is full and perfect good. But then, that is only the word of man, so how will we ever know if were doing evil or good? Evil being a crime in any fair and just society.
Therefore, the purpose of this world is to reach the ultimate conclusion of evil, so that we will know by experience the absolute difference between good and evil.
TEST TUBE MORALITY
“many human beings… would happily give up their ‘primitive genetic inheritance’ if they could live in a world that was run by peaceful, rational humans”
(1) As brains like sex appeal is in our genes and pass from father to son, should test tube people all be of the rich nobility, the blue blood purebreds and thoroughbreds with the highest pedigree?
(2) If everyone had a high IQ and equal intelligence, would that not create mutual gratification, a fake morality that makes happiness impossible?
A society where giving actions produce a grateful response, where everyone experiences compassion, pity and charity in a way that heart warming gratitude is enjoyed by all.
CREATE HEAVEN ON EARTH
Everyone is required by law to except as absolute fact, that this day of life is more then anyone deserves, that therefore they own nothing and that everything they have belongs to those who have less then them. Proof of compliance to this the highest law of the land, this shall be established by the loss of pleasure one suffers whenever they miss an opportunity to give all they can give.
Comments are closed.