Outspoken war enthusiast and British MP David Amess, a member of the ruling Conservative Party, today issued a statement angrily condemning news reports of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MeK) hiring political and military leadership to issue statements on their behalf.
The reports have been floating around awhile but have come to a particular head in the past couple of days, as major new reports emerged of the scope of the MeK’s massive campaign of hiring speakers aimed at getting them removed from the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations.
Amess insisted that the reports amount to “shooting the messenger,” while trading in what have been the MeK’s favorite talking points, claiming that it stands alone as the “real” opposition and accusing Iran’s current political opposition of “appeasement.”
The MP jumped a step further insisting that anyone who believes the MeK should remain on the terror list was part of a “policy of appeasement” toward the Iranian government, while predicting that the world would be united in an “ultimate confrontation” against Iran (read: war) presumably to install his favorite opposition group in their place, even if they are a Marxist-Islamist cult with decades of terrorist history.
Iran’s existing political opposition is opposed to removing the MeK from the terror list, both because of their violent past and because they fear it will make it easier for the regime to paint all opposition as radicals of their ilk.
7 thoughts on “British MP Praises Iranian Terror Group, Condemns Political Opposition”
Right now there are two issues which world is struggling to answer.., both questions and answers have a deep economic impact on peoples lives.., actually is why all these wars are taking place and been continued around the world of capitalism and socialism.., in between there is this neo fascism which been growing to fast and is not afraid to use all and everything in its arsenal to get what is real intentions are.., calling it “democracy”. Using the Muslims Brotherhood, the Saudis and UAE supported terrorist groups are just a beginning.., in the other hand neo – mercenaries training camps in UAE and Saudi Arabia where they are used in creating wars, supporting these terrorists’ organizations is another.
Look people.., world entered the neo fascism era with Balkan wars where the Balkan Mafia were used to divide Yugoslavia.., now they do it religious way to divide people.
So by this or that MP supporting a terrorist group shows that the present politics played by EU and US is not about democracy nor is about freeing a country from a Islamic or otherwise dictatorial regime.., but rather is about implementing a neo dictatorial system who supports the ideas behind a brutal economic system known as capitalism.
Look, US and EU for years been at war in Africa.., doing their best in depopulating Africa in any way they could.., Islamic wars are and ingrained from and supported by the Saudis and UAE, they are nothing but a brutal and dictatorial system there is.., and it is them whom are used by EU and US to divide people all over Africa and other part of the world where they be able to steal the African Nations wealth.., Libya is part of that nation. So is Iran is part of the heritage and culture in Middle East.., what they are trying to do is to support a fundamentalist over another helping the one who promise them more in terms of giving the Iranian assets to EU and US.
This is US and EU last alternative.., they chose this because they have no other alternatives but to work or support a network of terrorism.., their other alternative is to implement a true, functioning peoples democracy at home where the poverty would be the government priority, where education would be the government priority, healthcare, jobs and etc would be the government priority.., do you see any of these matters happening anywhere in US or EU.., is the present economy situation in US or EU presents any of these ideas to be implemented.., do you see any government.., conservative or Liberals in US or EU wanting to work on these issues.., NO.., on the contrary.., the London burning is about poor and existing poverty in England and rest of Europe.., yet this MP is more engaged in MeK then what the problem English people facing.
Look people, Empire is dead and what is left of empire “democracy” is some kind of falsified promises coming from one or other MP or even a president to fool the people.
What the writer call "Iran’s existing political opposition" is nothing but Iranian lobby group. MEK is the main Iranian opposition.
Read the facts: http://www.delistmek.com/
The main Iranian opposition is the Iranian people.., if MeK was the main opposition then they wouldn’t abandon the Iranian people and flee to Iraq.., recruiting students from all over Europe sending them to MeK camp in Iraq., many of these student ran for their life realizing the fact that MeK is not what they thought to be.
time to bring uno and no fly zone over england which suppresses the own citizens and shoots theem. what is sauce for the goose is—
London riots: Divine justice?
“Now let us imagine that for months – nay, years…I repeat, years, foreign powers had been arming and aiding not 300, but rather, 30,000 (thirty thousand) Islamist fanatics, who, equipped with heavy machine-guns, tanks, self-propelled artillery and anti-aircraft munitions, ran amok in London, Manchester, Liverpool and Bristol. If the police shot dead one man in Tottenham, if the police shot dead the Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, because he, er… "looked Asian" back in 2007, what would they do with 30,000 marauding thugs? Why, according to the British Government, evidently nothing, they would just stand back because "the people were deciding".
So why the bruhaha about Tottenham? But wait a minute, the police did react, against unarmed civilians! And if one civilian death is the result of a two-day incident involving 300 people, then we can extrapolate the figure of 100 civilian deaths at least, in the early hours of a general uprising, more or less exactly the real figures now coming out of Benghazi, and among these were Gaddafi supporters. Interesting.
Now let us imagine these "unarmed civilians" being attacked by the British police were actually heavily armed, had links to Al-Qaeda, were led by a convicted terrorist, were going around slashing people's throats in the streets, were torching government property and ransacking public offices. Let us imagine someone placed a stash of Viagra tablets on the floor of a police station and another stash of condoms inside the cells of Scotland Yard HQ, and then some American Congresswoman could claim there was proof of mass rape by the British authorities.
Then let someone call in the UN to bomb the crap out of Britain for five months because unarmed civilians were being attacked, to bomb the British armed forces fighting against this scourge so that the Islamist fanatics could gain ground, let us imagine the international media carried out an orchestrated campaign involving a blackout of the truth and the dissemination of lies, blaming the British authorities for atrocities it did not commit, blaming the RAF for sorties it did not fly…
Let us imagine the leaders of this UN clique of cowards, bombing British civilians from 30,000 feet for 5 (five) long months claimed that this was not about removing Cameron and Hague, then claimed that it would be better if they went, then claimed "They have to go". Then the British people could decide whether they were allowed to remain in Britain but of course, exile in Burkina Faso would be more appropriate (perhaps not, I insult the good Burkinese people)…”
Inch by inch, step by step, we are heading to war with Iran. The neo cons need the MEK to claim that they are the ones fighting for "freedom" for Iran, and Isreal and it's American fool are only doing the decent thing in helping them.
Iranian Terror Group? And who, preytell, designated them as a "terror group"? Terrorist USA? Terrorist Israel? Terrorist UK?
Comments are closed.