Top officials seem to be setting up a series of tests for the Libya War to ensure that the conflict will continue indefinitely. The latest pairing of conditions are a pledge that NATO “won’t force out” Gadhafi in the war, but that the war itself will continue as long as he remains.
The second part of this pledge comes from President Obama, British Prime Minister Cameron, and French President Sarkozy, who have all agreed to continue the war however long it takes for Gadhafi to leave.
This is the closest the alliance has come to defining an end-game condition since the war began last month, but officials still insist the UN mandate doesn’t include regime change. This means the end result isn’t even a hypothetical consequence of the war, but at best coincidental.
It is also an extreme long shot. Officials say the rebels, even after about a month of NATO-backed fighting, are still completely disorganized, and in no position to conquer the country, no matter how many arms European nations slip into the nation. A stalemate is still a likely result in this civil war, but NATO itself seems prepared to shrug off a settlement on the ground to keep their own war going pretty much forever.
1- This or dividing Libya was the only preference that Hillary Clinton and her NATO allies hade from the beginning.., another long term war is more desirable for US/NATO where in one hand most of those whom fighting from East Libya belong to a terrorist groups of one kind or the other and those whom are put there by CIA and supported by the US making certain that this war is a long one. Meanwhile they are going to support these elements of fraud with what ever they want and whatever they can give for this war to be continued.., they are creating another Somalia or Congo for that matter. The bloodshed this time is not on Kaddafi’s hand but rather on US/NATO hands starting this war, as they have in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2- Now that we know what they want (EU- US/NATO) then we also know how stupid they can be to create another war until the next election for Sarkozi, Cameron, the Italian Mafiosi himself Berlusconi and off course the Swedish neo conservatism whom their aliens with Neo Fascism (Neo Demokraterna) in government making sure that this is the case. Look.., this is the Neo Fascism working up to its best of its intelligent using the Muslim Brotherhood and other fundamentalist religious group to divide Libyan people.., these people are US/NATO last resorts to create wars.., now if it takes 5-10-20 years is not their problem.., they have done so in Congo and Congo is been burning for last 60 years. Libya is yet another of their benchmark carrying the names of Hillary Clinton, Obama and those whom are allied with tyrant regimes in Middle East.
Don't forget the re-election of the US very own Mafiosi himself. He's in that category too. Tough guy that he is.
Libya has always been run by force with Gadhafi at the helm ,but putting NATO in would be a bad move this would cause another un wanted war that is not needed at this moment in time there is to much going on in the world already .A UN peace keeping force would be a better solution and guide the people to run there own country although it is a long game.
If I were Gadaffi I would supply al Qaeda in Iraq and Afghanistan with so much munitions that it would make life untennable for the U.S. in Afghanistan.
The enemy is there, they need better weapons. If I were him I would give the Taliban whatever they asked for.
The US has left Gadaffi one choice since they want to bomb him until he leaves. Since he cannot make peace with the US, he must make peace with al Qaeda.
I assume if he were to pledge providing them with all the armorments they need, he could begin destabilizing the Saudi government and making life difficult for the US in Iraq and Afghanistan.
What he needs is do take out an aircraft carrier or two with a Moskit/Sunburn Missile and make things expensive for his enemies.
Getting to a few oil platforms would certainly cost money. He needs to think strategically for the long war. If he can get gas up to six dollars a gallon for a couple of years, those living in the US on 40K per year will end up eating rice and beans.
Day of Rage in Washington D.C. on 6/30/11 http://beforeitsnews.com/story/462/358/Day_of_Rag…
The American Revolution Has Begun http://beforeitsnews.com/story/499/546/The_Americ…
Free the Hutaree http://beforeitsnews.com/story/549/709/Why_Americ…
Well, so far, the lad seems to show no intention of leaving. So, I guess we're in for the long haul like in Afghanistan, still looking for Osama bin Laden and all that.
"War until Qadaffi leaves…" Holy gods of war, this is desperation on the cusp of madness.
Remembering of course that our pal Daffi is NOT a target.
Back in the 60's when the USG was arguing to continue the Viet Nam war they used to couch their rationalizations in philosophical terms – gotta stop the spread of evil communism – gotta prevent the domino-affect or we're all doomed to be sucked under the red thumb. Now, they're not even serious about swaying public opinion – because they really don't care what we think. What we think has no bearing on what they do and hasn't for a very long time. The "people" do NOT control the government and the government control of the people is growing and more pervasive every day. And those we elect to serve us and govern as the people wish…well, load the pipe and pass it around, please…
1-It is time for the US democratic party to be dissolved.., so is the time for the republican party.., having said that: the reasons for the argument is .., there is no democracy implemented by the democratic party nor the republicans social political agendas for the republic. There is absolutely no benefits for the people or by the people when these two parties are voted to govern the country. These two parties are war parties and therefore US been at wars for last 60 years.
2-USSR and its political wing the Communists party was dissolved because the systems was not working for the people and people demanded to be dissolved.., in US people need to do the same or the alternative would be demand from someone within the USG to define the word democracy where people would understand where they are and what is it that they are facing. US governments been acting and supporting a militaristic states and in terms of social political or social economic followed such policies both domestically and internationally, so the argument remain.., where is that democracy that USG talking about.
3-The people benefits are taken away from them one after another, social security, healthcare, jobs, their rights in political views and other social issues that people been fighting for in last 60 years, the uprising in Wisconsin capital is just an example. By USG creating more wars and for that or verity of reasons more of the peoples rights would be taken away; therefore, the time is now for people to act, it is the responsibilities of the local and states media to inform people about these matters, it is time for people to organize and create a true and functioning democratic political party where people matters are first in all social political agendas.
4-Voting alone is the basics rights of the people yet such rights been used and abused by USG promising changes which are yet to be materialized.., this has been the promises said and not done for last 20 years yet the all promises about wars from Balkans to Iraq and now in Libya been a fact in deception. There are many examples and US history is full of it, here it is not time nor a place to mentioning them.., but a short reminder.., from Vietnam to present wars in Libya USG been lying to people to start a war.
It is time for the US democratic party to be dissolved.., there is no democracy from or within this party.., is simply a war party so is the fact with republicans party.., if some one from the party can or would define the word, its principals and its social political or the economic meaning of the word democracy then people know what they are dealing with.., people been used and abused by all kind of corrupt politicians to serve the system.., capitalism.., here in this word and its social or political meaning there is no room for democracy but there are all kind of rooms and windows opportunities for war machineries and political statue Q – party. Therefore the US democratic party needs to be dissolved and replaced by a true and functioning democratic system for the people and by the people.