CIA Report: Systematic Failures in Lead Up to Khost Attack

Clear Warnings About Attacker 'Never Passed Along'

The CIA spent months scrambling for answers after the December bombing attack by Humam Khalil Abu-Mulal al-Balawi, an ostensibly “trusted” Jordanian agent, left seven CIA agents dead at Forward Operating Base Chapman in Khost, Afghanistan.

It wasn’t long before reports started to emerge about “questions” regarding Balawi’s trustworthiness, as it of course turned out he was in league with the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and had been operating as something of a “triple agent.”

According to new CIA reports there were more than just “questions” about Balawi, there was actually good evidence that Balawi couldn’t be trusted, and it was only through “systemic failures” across the agency that the attack was possible. Jordanian officials even warned Balawi might be leading them into an ambush.

The clear warnings about Balawi simply never got passed along to the people who needed to know, according to the investigation, and officials were so desperate for intelligence and so eager to meet with Balawi they relaxed a number of precautions leading up to the attack.

CIA chief Leon Panetta says that some changes will be made to procedure in the future but that no disciplinary measures will be taken against anyone involved in the myriad failures in the existing system.

Author: Jason Ditz

Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.