Though there appears to have been precious little evidence supporting anything untoward in the latest IAEA report on Iran, there seems to be considerable eagerness to start some sort of speculation based on something mentioned in it.
Today that concern seems to be centered around a mention that Iran had rejected some of the proposed inspectors on the grounds that they might be biased, which led the US today to condemn the move as “unprecedented” and accuse Iran of “trying to intimidate the IAEA.”
But this doesn’t seem to be the case, as the IAEA does allow nations to reject inspectors, and none of the rejections changed what should be the most important aspect, that the IAEA “continues to verify the non-diversion of nuclear materials.”
Iran hit back at the allegations today, insisting that the IAEA was never meant to be a “subordinate” to the UN Security Council and that it rejects any demands above and beyond the provisions of its Comprehensive Safeguards agreement as illegitmate.
The new IAEA report dated Sep 6 which was leaked to the media at that time has finally after nine days appeared on the IAEA website. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/…
Iran is correct in saying that on a treaty matter like the NPT one party to the treaty, Iran in this case, can not be subordinate to the other party, the UN. Certainly the US would never take orders from the UN on a treaty matter. (But of course the US is obviously GIVING orders to the UN regarding Iran.)
The one good aspect is that the American public seems to have other things on their minds right now, such as keeping their jobs (or finding them) and staying in their homes, so they're giving this concocted issue a big ho-hum. Let's hope so.
Why not make things alot easier and the UN declare Iran another homeland for the Zionists.