With the US having ignored a successfully negotiated third party enrichment deal with Iran and pushed forward a sanctions draft to the UN, they are reveling in the fact that the P5+1 appears to have signed on to the deal.
But not everyone is on board, notably Brazil and Turkey, two current UN Security Council members who fought tooth and nail to negotiate the enrichment deal the US-backed sanctions are looking to foil.
In addition to Brazil and Turkey another member of the Security Council, Lebanon, is firmly against the sanctions as well. The three will likely continue to fight against sanctions.
The US at this point is insisting the sanctions “have nothing to do with” the enrichment deal, but most will remember that only weeks ago they were putting forward the lack of an enrichment deal as the primary reason for the sanctions.
The current administration position suggests the US acted in extremely bad faith in its previous negotiations on the enrichment deal, and even if Brazil, Turkey and Lebanon don’t manage to foil the sanctions the timing of the announcement will likely do serious damage to US credibility abroad.
The US has always acted in bad faith, especially when it comes to Iran. The credibility of the Obama Administration is the same as the former Bush Administration: exactly zero. Brazil and Turkey have done a good thing. Everyone should support them.
Gloves came off for those who refused to see what Anglo-American coalition of Terror and Barbarity was all about.
AngloSphere'r war to enslave and RULE Humanity continues!
Let's cut the bull… It's oil, gas, and the religious
nuts which drive these so-called 'negotiations'.
Ignore Reality: Iran Sanctions
Washington's response often is forged by special elements of the US government bent to bring Iran on its knees begging for mercy. The proponents have had the same trenched position for many decades. It does not make any difference who governs Iran and state of democracy in the country; the objectives have been to keep Iran subservient on USA and a satellite nation. I think, it is not the Iranian nuclear fuel cycle, but it mainly is the insubordination of the Iranian governments that irks the US administrations.
Objective Realities for the Middle East:
What realities?
Thierry Meyssan French political analyst posted: "Strategy shift in the Middle East" and the issue of Iran position visa vie USA. The article says:"“The Iraqi chaos and the creation of a quasi-state in Kurdistan have forced neighbouring states to work together to avert a spillover effect, especially since Washington has already attempted to destabilize them all to keep them out of the Iraqi game. Thus the United States and Israel covertly supported Kurdish separatists in Turkey (PKK), those in Iran (Pejak) and those in Syria. As a result, the Iran-Syria axis has been replaced by the Iran-Syria-Turkey triangle. This new alliance enjoys a historical legitimacy without parallel." Please read the entire articlehttp://www.voltairenet.org/article165434.html
Are these analyses correct?
1- US and Europeans government always tried to split the people in Middle East where the idea been to save Israel. In the other hand the main idea behind the Iraq invasion was and is to militarize the entire middle east.., from Lebanon to Pakistan where US and Europeans (French – English – Germany – Denmark – Italy – Etc.) could dominate and occupy the area with their militarism regime. Only two main countries left for US – NATO to occupy ..,Iran and Syria.., here and due to Russian and Chinese strategic and economical investments their interests are in danger if Iran and Syria will fall into the hand of NATO – Israel. 2006 Israel attack on Lebanon and its real meaning was to occupy Lebanon and march toward Syria and Lebanon border, where the US marine would follow to save Israel being “under attack”.
2- The Kurdish PKK and the rest.., their political history been based on jumping from one idea to the next; therefore, they been vulnerable to cooperate with any of the left – right wing politics presented to them.., that is not because of the Saddam dictatorial regime but rather the Kurdish idea in having their own country established where they could build their paradise from the Oil income in Kirkuk and other part of what is called “Kurdistan“. Here.., PKK and the rest for the Kurdish movement being communist.., nationalists or social – democrats.., and throughout their history feed by Europeans Social Democrats political wings especially Swedes and Norwegians which always been a opportunistic.., they did succeeded and helped US – NATO to invade Iraq, now they have their main oil resource sold to Norwegians oil company and they are very happy.., when asked…, they see the US invasion as a freedom and not a occupation…
"The current administration position suggests the US acted in extremely bad faith in its previous negotiations on the enrichment deal, and even if Brazil, Turkey and Lebanon don’t manage to foil the sanctions the timing of the announcement will likely do serious damage to US credibility abroad."
Who said that the US still has any credibility in the rest of the world? They have squandered it. The only people who believe anything the US says are the uneducated citizens of that corrupt country. They do not realize that their government is controlled by Israel and does not work for their benefit but for the benefit of Israel.
The fundamental problem is UNSC Resolution 1696, which "demands" Iran halt enrichment. Iran didn't halt, which allowed the sanctions regime to commence. This failure to halt is IMO the reason why the Russians have failed to start the Bushehr power station. IMO, the Iranian nuclear program is peaceful, but I'm not the iAEA or a UNSC member state. When reading the commentary about the Resolution made by UNSC members other than the USA, it seems they interpret "halt" as a temporary suspension, not a full stop forever.
IMO, Iran must determine what the IAEA requires after it temporarilly suspends its enrichment, fulfill the IAEA requirements, and restart its program. If it does that, then I doubt the USA will be able to persue the matter further as China, Russia or both would veto any further action initiated by the USA against Iran through the UNSC.
The UN Security Council has no legitemacy,it conssist of 4 European nations,and one Asian,the 4 European nations represent about 20% of the world's population ,and one Asian is presenting the 80% of the world'a population. After the l945 the UN Security Council established to protedct the colonial powers interests by having a veto power,and they have used their veto power any time they have felt that it may weaken their hegomony over the world,the system is undemocratic and left over from the colonial days
Iranian have an expression it say"Salt is used to preserve almost every thing and God be with
us when salt needs to be preserved" the 5p+1 was supose to preserve now we see that this
preservetive needs help itself shame on GENOSIDERS of our time scume of the earth.