In a press conference in Islamabad today, NATO’s top civilian representative in Afghanistan Mark Sedwill conceded that the Taliban would be a “strong opponent” in the upcoming invasion of Kandahar.
“It will be a series of efforts, not really operations but efforts to reinforce and improve security in an incremental way across the city,” Sedwill noted. NATO initially tipped June as the date for starting the invasion of Kandahar.
But the failure to launch a much smaller incursion last week, not to mention the ongoing political row with the Karzai government over the offensive, has made the plan going forward unclear.
Both sides have been building up for months, and are setting up for what could well be the largest battle since the 2001 US invasion. Neither side is holding a lot of support within the city, however, and the prospect of either coming up with anything resembling victory seems remote.
All those "Taliban", holed up Kandahar like George Bush, yelling "Bring it on.".
Sure. Sure.
All those "Taliban", holed up Kandahar like George Bush, yelling "Bring it on.".
Sure. Sure.
Another sucker punch from NATO–who do they think they are dealing with, children?
Several US soldiers were killed in Afghanistan within the last week. The names, locations, and circumstances of each death were reported at the DOD web site under press resources/ press releases. Antiwar did almost no reporting on these combat deaths even though they are readily available. It is great to hear speculation about a battle that is weeks maybe months away but what about the on going carnage? The war that is happening now? How about some follow up on the three NATO soldiers reported killed today? One soldier was believed to be Canadian. The other two were likely US soldiers. The DOD will report their names, circumstance of death, location and hometown within a few days. Maybe they were killed in Kandahar in the southern provinces. They were both killed by roadside bombs so maybe the battle is already beginning on the fringes of the province. And why are two US non combat deaths in Iraq headline news and the Afghan Nato deaths relegated to the bottom of the site? What ever the case Antiwar could and should provide a better job of following the actual conflict and wasting less effort on endless empty speculation about what might happen. On average five to seven soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan every week for the last several weeks. Only a handful have been reported on your site.
Taliban a strong opponent? Just another way to golorify the war. How many jets, tanks, pieces of artillery do the Talibans have?
Taliban a strong opponent? Just another way to golorify the war. How many jets, tanks, pieces of artillery do the Talibans have?
Taliban a strong opponent? Just another way to golorify the war. How many jets, tanks, pieces of artillery do the Talibans have?
Given the terrain and logistics , that is exactly why the "Taliban" –or any other Afghans who want the US and NATO out–are strong.
If the US and NATO imbeciles had any brains they would be out tomorrow.
But they don't.
So might as well sit back and enjoy the show.
Given the terrain and logistics , that is exactly why the "Taliban" –or any other Afghans who want the US and NATO out–are strong.
If the US and NATO imbeciles had any brains they would be out tomorrow.
But they don't.
So might as well sit back and enjoy the show.