Though it has been over 70 years since the United States last used nuclear weapons in an offensive manner during a war, US governments have continued to retain some deliberate ambiguity on their policy toward the future use of such weapons.
Though there was considerable speculation that would change, President Obama is now believed to have abandoned any plans for a no first use statement with respect to America’s massive nuclear arsenal, facing too much opposition from the rest of the administration and giving up on the idea pretty quickly.
At present, China and India are the only two nations with a well-established no first use policy. North Korea has hinted at a similar position, though somewhat nebulously, and the Soviet Union also had such a position, though Russia does not retain that policy, saying it might use nuclear weapons in defense against an overwhelming conventional attack.
NATO as an alliance has historically rejected a no first use policy, though Obama was seen to be in favor of it as part of a general support of arms reduction. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter was said to have told Obama that such a statement would be seen as a “sign of weakness.”
Secretary of State John Kerry is also said to be opposed to such a statement, believing America’s nuclear deterrent would be weakened if it was committed to only being used in a retaliatory manner. Kerry is said to have cited China’s expansion in the South China Sea as a region to not make such a statement.
Indeed, it appears few advisers favored such a move, and Obama abandoned the matter quickly in the face of such opposition. Neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump is believed to be in favor of a similar measure, and the matter will likely be dropped entirely as the election nears.
The insanity at the “top levels” continues unabated.
Such a promise would be meaningless anyways when the US gov is building ABM sites in Eastern Europe, the entire purpose of which is to enable a devastating nuclear first strike.
Insane, but then again, we are exceptional.
NATO policy has not changed much from Hitler’s national socialists policy . That’s what the orthodox Christian Serbs said in the Balkans when NATO destroyed Yugoslavia . Now they again have taken the Baltic States and half of Ukraine . Russia and China will be together . They just haven’t switched to the strike fist nuclear policy yet ,Or maybe their just not so stupid as to announce it .
Isn’t the whole point of having nuclear weapons to deter an attack on one’s nation knowing that just because you attack doesn’t mean you won’t be attacked by a submarine with nuclear capabilities stationed somewhere not far from your homelands shores.Why would any nation not exercise the right to strike a hostile nation if it could end a war before it even begins? As a citizen of the United States I gotta say I don’t always agree with Obama but he got it right on this one…USA
Well then – you’d have to agree with any other nation using that argument. I’m surprised every nation on earth hasn’t used your rationale to develop nuclear weapons.
“Why would any nation not exercise the right to strike a hostile nation if it could end a war before it even begins?”
You’re assuming that the “intelligence” that “justifies” wars and military strikes is above board, but sadly this intelligence is usually cherry-picked information that supports war regardless of ALL THE FACTS! You can’t trust politicians who survive only from support of war profiteers. And allowing a first strike nuke only sets a precedent which will lead to the destruction of the planet. The USA has got to start using REAL diplomacy to end these lie-based wars!
Can’t argue with that logic but if our government is telling us all these cherry picked lies what’s Russia or China’s or North Korea’s government telling there citizens? I’m sorry but I don’t think anybody would agree that there telling there people the truth.I mean after all North Korea’s leader was born on a magical mystical mountain according to there press but hey you believe what you want…USA
Luckily this scum is toast… But WHO…. What, will replace this pig noir…
I was shocked when president Bush announced the right to use nuclear weapons first . Now NATO and even Obama agree this is our policy . So I presume maybe Russia and China will eventually to be forced to change their policy to be the same as ours . I would think the 1st strike policy would certainly cause he most damage because it should be fired at the enemies nuclear deliver system . I thought this sounded very foolish to claim the right to be the aggressor . Here again NATO is stating we will not honor the international laws we have asked you to sign and agree to . And Obama our peace prize winner agreed with this . We should be ashamed of ourselves
Sorry, our Leadership cadre have no shame. But we who continue to vote these cretins into those leadership positions, as you say should be ashamed and ultimately, concerned. These people have obviously forgotten (or ignored) the results of using such weaponry.
There is no reset button!!
Then we wonder why any other country might want to develop nuclear weapons as a deterrent to that first use on their nation.
Let’s oust the madmen…
OMG…..!!!!! No Nukes (Except for US..) Poster Boy. Peace Tojan Whorse, and NOW First Strike Advocate… Git the fuhk into History’$ Trash bin B4 your sold out Unkill Tom legacy completely buries any glimmer of any HOPE you may have shoplifted from Pete Seegar, Jimmy Carter or some ACTUAL paragon of hope, no matter how imperfect but not an enemy of peace. Torture Promoter War Criminalan out and out opportunist and user…. Take your place with Condo Lica Rice, Colon Howell and the other less sung blackish war criminal hookerz and pimps for murder, rape and Torture…You could have been a contender, but sank beneath such wisdom like a drone.. And there is last but not least YOUR torture and abdication of any decency, humanity and or empathy for Omar Kadr
This is meaningless. Everyone knows Obama would never approve a first strike of nuclear magnitude.
…is that supposed to be bad?
He already droned the Nobel Peace Prize!
China? Why not nuke China..
Saying you wouldn’t use a first strike is a sign of weakness? I guess incinerating millions is a sign of strength. What a f**ked up world we live in. And John Kerry should keep his Mister Ed mouth shut because nothing but stupid s**t comes out.